UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE14a-101)

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (DEF 14A)


Filed by the Registrant  x        Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  

Check the appropriate box:

xPreliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Pursuant to§240.14a-12 §240.14a-12

Ascena Retail Group, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

xNo fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.

(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 

(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 

(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 

(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 

(5)Total fee paid:
 

Fee previously paid with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)Amount Previously Paid:
 

(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 

(3)Filing Party:
 

(4)Date Filed:
 





a2019proxyimage1a01.jpg

933 MacArthur Boulevard

Mahwah, New Jersey 07430

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Meeting Date:Thursday,Tuesday, December 7, 201710, 2019
Meeting Time:3:00 p.m. local time
Location:

dressbarn’s

Corporate Headquarters

Stage Street Café

933 MacArthur Boulevard

Mahwah, New Jersey 07430

The Annual Meeting will be held for the following purposes:

(1)to consider the election of threefour directors to serve on the board of directors for three-year terms and until their successors are duly elected and qualified (Proposal One);

(2)to approve the Ascena Retail Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2018) (Proposal Two);

(3)(2)to consider the approval, bynon-binding advisory vote, of the compensation paid to our named executive officers during fiscal 20172019 (commonly known as a“say-on-pay” “say-on-pay” proposal) (Proposal Two);
(3)to approve an amendment to the Company’s Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock, at a ratio to be determined by the Board, and a corresponding reduction in the Company’s authorized shares of common stock (Proposal Three);

(4)to recommend, bynon-binding advisory vote, the frequency of future advisory votes on compensation paid to our named executive officers (commonly known as a “frequency ofsay-on-pay” proposal) (Proposal Four);

(5)(4)to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the fiscal year ending August 4, 20181, 2020 (Proposal Five)Four); and

(6)
(5)to transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.

The board of directors has fixed the close of business on October 10, 201715, 2019 as the record date for the determination of the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting.

In order to conserve natural resources and reduce the cost of printing and distributing the proxy materials, while providing our stockholders with access to the proxy materials in a fast and efficient manner, we are pleased to be able to take advantage of the Securities and Exchange Commission rule allowing companies to use a “Notice and Access” model to provide their stockholders with access to proxy materials via the Internet. On or about October 26, 2017,30, 2019, we will begin mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice of Internet Availability”) to our stockholders informing them that our notice of annual meeting and proxy statement, Annual Report on Form10-K and voting instructions are available on the Internet at https://proxyvote.com. As more fully described in the Notice of Internet Availability, all stockholders may choose to access our materials at https://proxyvote.com or may request to receive paper copies of the proxy materials.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
By:

/s/ David Jaffe

Carrie W. Teffner
Carrie W. Teffner
 David Jaffe
ChairmanInterim Executive Chair of the Board and
 Chief Executive Officer

Dated: October 26, 2017

30, 2019

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. EVEN IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, WE HOPE THAT YOU WILL READ THE PROXY STATEMENT AND VOTE ON THE MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED.CONSIDERED IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. YOU MAY VOTE YOUR PROXY BY TELEPHONE OR VIA THE INTERNET OR BY REQUESTING A PRINTED COPY OF THE PROXY MATERIALS AND RETURNING THE PROXY CARD ENCLOSED THEREIN.






TABLE OF CONTENTS

 1 
 1 
 2 
 6 
 12 
 19 
 22 
 39 
Summary Compensation Table40 
 42 
 44 
 47 
 48 
  52
 53 
 54 
 59 
Proposal Three — Resolution On Executive Compensation62
63
Proposal Five — Ratification of the Engagement of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 64 
 66 
 67 
 69 
 70 

  

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.2017 Proxy Statement



PROXY STATEMENT


In this proxy statement, the terms “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Ascena Retail Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Ascena” or the “Company”), and its consolidated subsidiaries, ANN INC., referred to as “ANN”, Tween Brands, Inc., referred to as “Justice”, Lane Bryant, Inc., referred to as “Lane Bryant”, Maurices Incorporated, referred to as “maurices”, The Dress Barn, Inc., referred to as “dressbarn”, and Catherines Stores Corporation, referred to as “Catherines”.

GENERAL

The enclosed proxy is solicited by the board of directors (the “Board”) of Ascena for use at our 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held at 3:00 p.m. local time, on Thursday,Tuesday, December 7, 201710, 2019 at dressbarn’sour Corporate Headquarters, Stage Street Café, 933 MacArthur Boulevard, Mahwah, New Jersey 07430, and any and all adjournments or postponements thereof. This proxy statement and form of proxy, along with our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2017,August 3, 2019, are being made available to our stockholders on or about October 26, 2017.30, 2019. The proxy statement and proxy card are being made available to you because our records indicate that you owned shares of our common stock at the close of business on October 10, 2017,15, 2019, the record date for the Annual Meeting.

Our Board is soliciting your proxy to be used at the Annual Meeting. When you sign the proxy card, you appoint two of our directors, Randy L. PearceLinda Yaccarino and Katie J. Bayne,John Welborn, Jr., as your representatives at the Annual Meeting. One or both of these individuals, or a substitute if necessary, will vote your shares at the Annual Meeting as you have instructed them on the proxy card. If you sign and deliver your proxy card, but you do not provide voting instructions, your proxy representative will vote in favor of the threefour nominees for director (Proposal One), in favor of Proposals Two, Three and Five, for once every one year with respect to the frequency ofsay-on-pay proposal (Proposal Four),Four, and with respect to any other matter that may be properly presented at the Annual Meeting, in the discretion of the proxy representative. This way, your shares will be voted whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you complete, sign and return your proxy card in advance of the Annual Meeting as your plans may change.



IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE 20172019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 7, 2017

10, 2019

The rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted rules that allow us to change the way we make our proxy statement and other Annual Meeting materials available to you.you over the Internet. On or about October 26, 2017,30, 2019, we will begin mailing a notice, called the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice of Internet Availability”), to our stockholders advising them that our proxy statement, Annual Report on Form10-K and voting instructions can be accessed via the Internet at https://proxyvote.com. You may then access these materials and vote your shares over the Internet or you may request that a printed copy of the proxy materials be sent to you. You will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request one in the manner set forth in the Notice of Internet Availability. This allows us to conserve natural resources and reduces the cost of printing and distributing the proxy materials, while providing our stockholders with access to the proxy materials in a fast and efficient manner via the Internet. Copies of this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2017August 3, 2019 are also available online at https://proxyvote.com.




LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.120172019 Proxy Statement



QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT OUR ANNUAL MEETING


When and where will the Annual Meeting take place?

The Annual Meeting will be held on Thursday,Tuesday, December 7, 2017,10, 2019, at 3:00 p.m., at dressbarn’sour Corporate Headquarters, Stage Street Café, 933 MacArthur Boulevard, Mahwah, New Jersey 07430.

What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?

At our Annual Meeting, holders of our common stock will be asked to vote on the following proposals:

(1)election of threefour directors to serve on the Board for three-year terms and until their successors are duly elected and qualified (Proposal One);

(2)to approve the Ascena Retail Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2018) (Proposal Two);

(3)(2)to consider the approval, bynon-binding advisory vote, of the compensation paid to our named executive officers during fiscal 20172019 (commonly known as a“say-on-pay” “say-on-pay” proposal) (Proposal Two);
(3)to approve an amendment to the Company’s Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company's common stock, at a ratio to be determined by the Board, and a corresponding reduction in the Company's authorized shares of common stock (Proposal Three);

(4)to recommend, bynon-binding advisory vote, the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation paid to our named executive officers (commonly known as a “frequency ofsay-on-pay” proposal) (Proposal Four);

(5)ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the fiscal year ending August 4, 20181, 2020 (Proposal Five)Four); and

(6)to transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.

What are the Board’s voting recommendations?

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THE ELECTION OF THE THREEFOUR NOMINATED DIRECTORS,FOR THE SAY-ON-PAY PROPOSAL, FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (AMENDEDAMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE ASCERTIFICATE OF JANUARY 1, 2018),FOR THESAY-ON-PAY PROPOSAL, FOR EVERYONE YEAR WITH RESPECTINCORPORATION, TO EFFECT A REVERSE STOCK SPLIT AND A CORRESPONDING REDUCTION IN THE FREQUENCY OFCOMPANY’S AUTHORIZED SHARES, AND SAY-ON-PAYFOR PROPOSAL ANDFOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.

Unless you give other instructions on your proxy card, the persons referred to as proxy holders on the proxy card will vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board or, with respect to any other matter that may be presented at the Annual Meeting for which no recommendation is given, in their own discretion.

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

Ourby-laws require prior notification of a stockholder’s intent to request a vote on other matters at the Annual Meeting. The deadline for notification has passed, and we are not aware of any other matters that could be brought before the Annual Meeting. However, if any other business is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, your vote by proxy gives authority to Randy L. PearceLinda Yaccarino and Katie J. Bayne,John Welborn, Jr., the persons referred to as proxy holders on the proxy card (or a substitute, if necessary), to vote your shares on such matters atin their discretion.

Who is entitled to attend the Annual Meeting?

All stockholders who owned our common stock at the close of business on October 10, 201715, 2019 (the “Record Date”), or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. Registration begins at 2:45 p.m. on the date of the Annual Meeting. If you attend, please note that you may be asked to present valid photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. Please note that if you hold your shares in “street name” (that is, through a broker, bank or other nominee), you must obtain a signed and properly executed proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee to vote your shares held in street name at the Annual Meeting, and such proxy, together with a broker statement evidencing your ownership, must be presented at the Annual Meeting.

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Subject to the foregoing, all stockholders who owned our common stock at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting or at any adjournments or postponements thereof.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.22017 Proxy Statement


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT OUR ANNUAL MEETING

How many votes do I have?

You have one vote for each share of our common stock that you owned on the Record Date.

How many votes must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?

The presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Once a share of the Company’s common stock is represented for any purpose at the Annual Meeting, it is deemed present for quorum purposes for the Annual Meeting and for

Ascena Retail Group, Inc.22019 Proxy Statement


any adjournment of the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker “non-votes” are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business. A broker “non-vote” occurs when a broker or nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a proposal because the broker or nominee does not have the necessary voting power for that proposal and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. In order for us to determine that enough votes will be present to hold the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote in advance by proxy even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.

Assuming a quorum is present, how many votes will be required to approve each proposal?

A majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting will elect the threefour nominees to serve as directors. A “majority of the votes cast” means that the number of shares voted “FOR” a nominee for director exceeds the number of votes cast “AGAINST” such nominee;

The proposal to approve the Ascena Retail Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2018) will be approved if the votes cast in favor of the proposal at the Annual Meeting exceed the votes cast in opposition to the proposal;

Thesay-on-pay proposal will be approved, bynon-binding advisory vote, if the votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the votes cast in opposition to the proposal;

The frequencyproposal to approve an amendment to the Company’s Third Amended and Restated Certificate ofsay-on-pay proposal Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company's common stock, at a ratio to be determined by the Board, and a corresponding reduction in the Company's authorized shares of common stock, will be determined, bynon-binding advisoryapproved if the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote based uponat the alternative receivingAnnual Meeting vote in favor of the greatest number of votes cast;proposal; and

The proposal to ratify the appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm will be approved if the votes cast in favor of the proposal at the Annual Meeting exceed the votes cast in opposition to the proposal.

A note about broker non-votes: Under NYSE rules, brokers are not permitted to vote uninstructed shares for non-routine matters, which include director elections and executive compensation matters. As a result, if your shares are held by a brokerage firm for you as beneficial owner and you do not instruct your broker how to vote your shares on Proposal One (election of directors), or Proposal Two (approval of the Ascena Retail Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2018)), Proposal Three (thesay-on-pay proposal) or Proposal Four (the frequency ofsay-on-pay proposal), your brokerage firm cannot vote them for you. Please make sure that you provide instructions to your broker regarding Proposals One Two, Three and Four.Two. The ratification of the appointment of independent accountants isand the proposal to approve an amendment to the Company’s Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split and a corresponding reduction in the Company’s authorized shares of common stock are both routine itemitems under NYSE rules. As a result, brokers who do not receive instructions as to how to vote on Proposal FiveThree and Four may vote on thatthose matter in their discretion.

What is the effect of a “broker non-vote” or abstention on the proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

Abstentions and broker non-votes will be considered as present for quorum purposes, but will have no impact on the vote on Proposal One, Two, or Four. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” Proposal Three. Because Proposal Three and Proposal Four are both routine items under NYSE rules, we do not anticipate any of the proposals.

broker non-votes with respect to either Proposal Three or Proposal Four.

How many votes may be cast by all stockholders?

A total of 196,007,504[ ] votes may be cast at the Annual Meeting, consisting of one vote for each share of our common stock outstanding on the Record Date.

How do I vote?

You can vote your shares in one of two ways: either by proxy or in person at the Annual Meeting by written ballot. If you choose to vote by proxy, you may do so via the Internet or by telephone, or by requesting a printed copy of the proxy materials, and signing and returning the proxy card enclosed therein. Each of these procedures is explained below. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, the Board recommends that you vote by proxy so your shares of common stock will be voted as directed by you if you are unable to attend the Annual Meeting.


Because many stockholders cannot attend the Annual Meeting in person, it is necessary that a large number of stockholders be represented by proxy. By following the procedures for voting via the Internet or by telephone, or by requesting a printed copy of the proxy materials and signing

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.32017 Proxy Statement


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT OUR ANNUAL MEETING

and returning the proxy card enclosed therein, you will enable Mr. PearceMs. Yaccarino and/or Ms. Bayne,Mr. Welborn, each of whom is named on the proxy card as a “proxy holder,” to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting in the manner indicated. If you sign and return your proxy card, but do not specify how you want your shares to be voted, they will be voted, in accordance with the Board’s recommendation, “FOR” the threefour director nominees named in Proposal One, in favor of Proposals Two, Three and Five, for every one year with respect to Proposal Four, and with respect to any other matter that may be presented at the Annual Meeting, in the discretion of the proxy holders named in your proxy card.

Voting via the Internet

You can vote your shares via the Internet by following the instructions in the Notice of Internet Availability or by accessing www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions contained on that website. The Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate your identity and to allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your voting instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote via the Internet, you do not need to mail a proxy card.


Ascena Retail Group, Inc.32019 Proxy Statement


Voting by Telephone

You can vote your shares by telephone by calling the number provided on the voting website (www.proxyvote.com) and on the proxy card. The telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate your identity and to allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your voting instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote via the telephone, you do not need to mail a proxy card.

Voting by Mail

You can vote by mail by requesting that a printed copy of the proxy materials be sent to your home address. Upon receipt of the materials, you may fill out the proxy card enclosed therein and return it per the instructions on the card.

May I change or revoke my vote after I submit my proxy?

Yes. To change your vote previously submitted by proxy, you may:

Cast a new vote by mailing a new proxy card with a later date or by voting via the Internet or telephone on a later date; or

If you hold shares in your name, attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person.

If you wish to revoke rather than change your vote, written revocation must be received by our Corporate Secretary prior to the Annual Meeting.

What if I participate in the Company’s 401(k) Savings Plan?

If you are a participant in the Company’s 401(k) Savings Plan (the “401(k) plan”) and own shares of the Company’s common stock in your 401(k) plan account as of the Record Date, you will receive, with respect to the number of shares held for your account under the 401(k) plan as of the Record Date, a proxy card that will serve as a voting instruction to the trustee of the 401(k) plan with respect to shares held for your account. Unless the proxy card is signed and returned, shares held in your account under the 401(k) plan will not be voted.

How can I attend the Annual Meeting?

Stockholders as of the close of business on the Record Date may attend the Annual Meeting. You may obtain directions to the location of the Annual Meeting by contacting Ascena’s Investor Relations Department at (551)777-6895 or via email atasc-ascenainvestorrelations@ascenaretail.com.

What happens if the Annual Meeting is postponed or adjourned?

If the Annual Meeting is postponed or adjourned and no new record date is set, your proxy will remain valid and may be voted when the Annual Meeting is convened or reconvened. You may change or revoke your proxy until it is voted.

Will your independent registered public accounting firm participate in the Annual Meeting?

Yes. Our independent registered public accounting firm is Deloitte & Touche LLP. A representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and make any statements he or she deem necessary and to respond to appropriate stockholder questions.

Are members of the Board required to attend the Annual Meeting?

Directors are encouraged, but not required, to attend the Annual Meeting. All of the Company’s then current directors attendedthat were directors at the 2016time of the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders attended the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.42017 Proxy Statement


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT OUR ANNUAL MEETING

Who will pay the expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation of my vote?

We pay all costs and expenses related to preparation of these proxy materials and solicitation of your vote and all Annual Meeting expenses. None of our directors, officers or employees will be specially compensated for these activities. We reimburse brokers, fiduciaries and custodians for their costs in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners of our common stock, but we will not pay any compensation for their services.

Why did I receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability?

You may receive multiple Notices of Internet Availability if you hold your shares of our common stock in multiple accounts (such as through a brokerage account and an employee benefit plan, such as the 401(k) plan). To ensure all of your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting, please vote your shares as instructed in each Notice of Internet Availability you receive.

If your household is receiving multiple Notices of Internet Availability and you wish to request delivery of a single copy or wish to enroll in electronic (email) delivery of the proxy materials, you may send a written request to Ascena Retail Group, Inc., 933 MacArthur Boulevard, Mahwah, New Jersey 07430, Attention: Investor Relations or via email atasc-ascenainvestorrelations@ascenaretail.com.


Ascena Retail Group, Inc.42019 Proxy Statement


How do I obtain a separate Notice of Internet Availability if I share an address with other stockholders?

In order to reduce printing and postage costs, only one Notice of Internet Availability is being delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless we received contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders sharing that address. If your household has received only one Notice of Internet Availability, we will promptly deliver an additional Notice of Internet Availability to any stockholder (as of the close of business on the Record Date) who sends a written request to: Ascena Retail Group, Inc., 933 MacArthur Boulevard, Mahwah, New Jersey 07430, Attention: Investor Relations or via email atasc-ascenainvestorrelations@ascenaretail.com. If you wish to receive a separate Notice of Internet Availability in the future, you can notify us by mailing a written request to the address above, by calling our Investor Relations Department at (551)777-6895 or via email atasc-ascenainvestorrelations@ascenaretail.com.

Can I view these proxy materials electronically?

Yes. You may access the proxy statement and our annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K at https://proxyvote.com. In addition to the fiscal 20172019 proxy statement and Annual Report on Form10-K, you can view all of our other filings with the SEC on our website at the “for investors”“investors” page at www.ascenaretail.com, accessible through the “Investor Relations Menu.”

“Corporate Governance” tab.

How can I receive copies of the Company’s year-end SEC filings?

We will furnish without charge to any stockholder who requests, in writing, a copy of our Annual Report on Form10-K, including financial statements and related schedules, for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2017,August 3, 2019, as filed with the SEC. Any such request should be directed to Ascena Retail Group, Inc., 933 MacArthur Boulevard, Mahwah, New Jersey 07430, Attention: Investor Relations or via email atasc-ascenainvestorrelations@ascenaretail.com.

How do stockholders submit proposals for the Company’s 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders?

Proposals of stockholders intended to be presented at the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and desired to be included in our proxy statement for that meeting must be received by our Corporate Secretary and General Counsel, c/o Ascena Retail Group, Inc., 933 MacArthur Boulevard, Mahwah, New Jersey 07430 by no later than June 28, 2018July 2, 2020 in order to be included in such proxy statement. Any such proposal must also meet the other requirements of the rules of the SEC relating to stockholder proposals. Generally, if written notice of any stockholder proposal intended to be presented at the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and not included in our proxy statement for that meeting, is not delivered to the Corporate Secretary and General Counsel at the above address by June 28, 2018,between July 2, 2020 and August 1, 2020, or if such notice does not contain the information required by Section 7 of Article II of ourby-laws, the chair of the meeting may declare that such stockholder proposal be disregarded.

Can I see a list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

A complete list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is available for inspection at the principal office of the Company upon written request to the Company by a stockholder, and at all times during the Annual Meeting at the place of the Annual Meeting.




LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.520172019 Proxy Statement



PROPOSAL ONE — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


Our SecondThird Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, provides for a classified Board divided into three classes, each with a staggered three-year term of office and each class of directors as nearly equal in number as possible. At the Annual Meeting, threefour directors are to be elected for three-year terms. On the recommendation of the Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Governance Committee”), the Board has nominated David Jaffe, Kate BuggelnKatie J. Bayne, Paul Keglevic, Kay Krill and Carl Rubin,Stacey Rauch, current directors whose terms of office expire at the Annual Meeting, for election for three-year terms expiring at the 20202022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Each nominee has indicated that he/he or she will serve if elected. We do not anticipate that any Board nominee will be unable or unwilling to stand for election, but should any such nominee be unavailable for election for any reason, your proxy, to the extent permitted by applicable law, may be voted with discretionary authority in connection with the nomination by the Board and the election of any substitute nominee. On October 19, 2016, Mr. Elliot S. Jaffe notified the Company of his intention not to stand for re-election at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. On June 8, 2017,September 30, 2019, the Board increased the size ofwas expanded by two, and the Board to ten directors pursuantappointed Mr. Keglevic to the Company’sby-laws, and appointed Marc Lasry and Stacey Rauch to fill the vacancy created by such increase and the existing vacancy on the Board each as membersa member of the class of directors whose termterms of office expireswill expire at the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and appointed Gary D. Begeman to the Board as a member of the class of directors whose terms of office will expire at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The charts below provide summary information about the composition of our Board, followed by the biographies of the director nominees and our current Board members. Please see the section below entitled “Questions and Answers About our Board and Corporate Governance Matters” for additional information about our Board and the committees of the Board.

BOARD COMPOSITION(as of October 26, 2017)15, 2019)

Gender Diversity:

LOGO

Given that the Company’s

gendericons004.jpg
nThrough our unique portfolio of fashion brands, Ascena’s core purpose is dedicated to helpingprovide all women and girls put their most confident selves forwardwith fashion and inspiration for living confidently every day, weday. We are honored that half of our Board is comprised of women.women, led by Kate Buggeln as our Lead Independent Director and Carrie W. Teffner as our recently appointed Interim Executive Chair of the Board. According to the Board Refreshment Trends at S&P 1500 Firms report publishedGender Diversity Index issued by Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”), in January 2017, just a tiny fraction (one halfEquilar for the first quarter of one percent)calendar 2019, the percentage of S&P 1500women on Russell 3000 boards increased for the sixth consecutive quarter to approximately 19%; however, it was also noted that less than 40 Russell 3000 companies hadhave achieved gender parity. We are honored to have achieved gender parity on their boards in 2015, and the available 2016 data suggested that the prevalence of S&P 1500 firms with half the board comprising female directors had increased to only 0.8 percent.

our Board.

Board Refreshment:

LOGOLOGO

combinedbrdchartforproxy2a01.jpg

nu
The Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board also believe that it is important for the Board to be “refreshed” by adding new directors with fresh perspectives from time to time. In that regard, since 2015 we have added seventen new directors, resulting in an average director tenure of less than five years, with an average director age of 58.

57.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.620172019 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL ONE — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTEFOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW TO SERVE AS DIRECTORS.



Information about Director Nominees:

Following is information regarding the director nominees and the other continuing directors.

Name of Director Nominee and Age

Director
Since

David Jaffe, 58

Katie J. Bayne, 53
2001  2015

Kate Buggeln, 56

Paul Keglevic, 65
2004  2019

Carl Rubin, 58

Kay Krill, 642015
Stacey Rauch, 612017

DAVID JAFFE

 KATIE J. BAYNE

Age: 58

Age: 53
Director Since: 2001

Background:

DAVID JAFFE serves as a director (since 2001), as our Chief Executive Officer (since 2002) and as Chairman of the Board (since 2016). Previously, he was President from 2002-2017, and Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer since 2001. Mr. Jaffe joined our Company in 1992 as Vice President, Business Development and became Senior Vice President in 1995, Executive Vice President in 1996 and Vice Chairman in 2001. He is the son of Elliot S. and Roslyn S. Jaffe. Elliot S. Jaffe is the formerSinceNon-Executive: 2015 Chairman of the Board, aco-founderCommittees and currently serves as Chairman Emeritus. Roslyn S. Jaffe is a co-founder, Secretary and Director Emeritus for Life. David Jaffe is the brother of Elise Jaffe, a non-executive officer and a more than 5% stockholder, and Richard Jaffe, a significant holder of the Company’s stock. Mr. Jaffe is also a member of the Board of Directors of The National Retail Federation.

Qualifications:

The Board selected Mr. Jaffe to serve as a director based on his extensive retail and financial background.

KATE BUGGELN:

Age: 56

Director Since: 2004

Committees:

    Audit

Leadership and Corporate

Governance (chair)

Background:

KATE BUGGELN is a retail and brand consultant and

KATIE J. BAYNE serves as a Senior Advisor with Irving Place Capital, L.P. Currently,Guggenheim Securities, the investment banking and capital markets division of Guggenheim Partners. Concurrently, Ms. BuggelnBayne serves as a memberfounder and President of the boardBayne Advisors, an advisory firm that helps brands and businesses find their strategic identities, drive sustained consumer engagement and innovate for publicly traded Five Below, Inc. She also is on the boards of Noble Biomaterials, Scoop Holdings (parent company of cabi)transformative results. Ms. Bayne began her career with The Coca-Cola Company in 1989 in brand management and the nonprofit Bpeace. Previously, Ms. Buggeln was Senior Vice President, Strategic Planning and Business Development at Coach, Inc., where she created and led strategies to enter new markets and new categories. Ms. Buggeln also spent many years as a retail consultant at LakeWest Group Ltd. and Coopers & Lybrand LLP, where she advised retail companies on business strategy, operations,e-commerce and supply chain. In addition, Ms. Buggeln served on the board of directors of each of The Vitamin Shoppe, Stuart Weitzman and Timberland Company.

Qualifications:

The Board selected Ms. Buggeln to serve as a director based on her strong background in strategic planning, marketing and new business development.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.72017 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL ONE — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

CARL “CHUCK” RUBIN

Age: 58

Director Since: 2015

Committees:

    Audit

    Compensation (chair)

Background:

CARL “CHUCK” RUBIN currently serves as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of The Michaels Companies, Inc. He joined Michaels in 2013 as its Chief Executive Officer and was appointed as Chairman of the Board in 2015. Prior to joining Michaels, from 2010 to 2013, Mr. Rubin was President and Chief Executive Officer of Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrances, Inc. Mr. Rubinhas since held roles of increasing responsibility, at Office Depot, serving as President beginning in 2006. Mr. Rubin spent six years in senior leadership roles, including Partner, at Accenture Consulting where he advised clients and led engagements across retail formats and ecommerce business. Prior to joining Accenture Consulting, Mr. Rubin held various management positions in the specialty retail and department store industries. Mr. Rubin was a member of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of The National Retail Federation from 2007 to 2010.

Qualifications:

The Board selected Mr. Rubin to serve as a director based on his extensive managerial and operational knowledge of the retail industry and his experience as a board member of a publicly held specialty retailer.

Directors with Terms Expiring in 2018

  Name of Director and AgeDirector
Since

Steven L. Kirshenbaum, 65

2015

Randy L. Pearce, 62

2005

Linda Yaccarino, 54

2016

STEVEN L. KIRSHENBAUM

Age: 65

Director Since: 2015

Background:

STEVEN L. KIRSHENBAUM is a senior partner in the Corporate Department of Proskauer Rose LLP, an international law firm with headquarters in New York City. Mr. Kirshenbaum has served as a member of Proskauer’s Executive Committee, a Chair of the firm’s Corporate Department and managing partner of Proskauer’s Paris Office. He hasin-depth experience in general corporate, transactional, governance and securities practice areas, representing domestic and foreign companies.

Qualifications:

The Board selected Mr. Kirshenbaum to serve as a director based on his knowledge of the Company, and extensive experience in mergers and acquisitions, securities compliance and corporate governance, each of which strengthens the Board’s collective qualifications, skills and experience.

RANDY L. PEARCE

Age: 62

Director Since: 2005

Committees:

    Audit (chair)

    Compensation

Background:

RANDY L. PEARCE was from February 2011 until his retirement on June 30, 2012, President of Regis Corporation, an owner, operator and franchisor of hair and retail product salons. From 1998 until February 2011, Mr. Pearce served as Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of Regis Corporation, and held various executive positions at Regis Corporation since 1985.

Qualifications:

The Board selected Mr. Pearce to serve as a director based on his extensive financial background in auditing and in internal controls over financial reporting of large publicly held retail companies. On March 4, 2015, Mr. Pearce was appointed to serve as the Company’s Lead Independent Director.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.82017 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL ONE — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

LINDA YACCARINO

Age: 54

Director Since: 2016

Committees:

    Leadership and Corporate

    Governance

    Compensation

Background:

LINDA YACCARINO is Chairman, Advertising, Sales and Client Partnerships for NBCUniversal, Inc. In this role she oversees all advertising sales and market strategy for the company’s entire portfolio of premium video content, including broadcast, cable and digital. Prior to joining NBCUniversal in 2011, she held roles of increasing responsibility from 1996 to 2011 at Turner Broadcast System, Inc., serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Turner Entertainment Advertising, Sales and Marketing, and Acquisitions beginning in 2009. Prior to joining Turner, Ms. Yaccarino held various management positions at several media sales outlets.

Qualifications:

The Board selected Ms. Yaccarino to serve as a director based on her extensive digital knowledge, multiplatform consumer engagement and transformation experience.

Directors with Terms Expiring in 2019

  Name of Director Nominee and AgeDirector
Since

Katie J. Bayne, 51

2015

Kay Krill, 62

2015

Marc Lasry, 58

2017

Stacey Rauch, 59

2017

KATIE J. BAYNE

Age: 51

Director Since: 2015

Committees:

    Leadership and Corporate

    Governance

Background:

KATIE J. BAYNE serves as Senior Vice President at The Coca-Cola Company. Ms. Bayne joined Coca-Cola in 1989, and held positions of increasing responsibility focused on consumer strategy, retail marketing and commercial strategy/consumer marketing in the USU.S., Australia and Australia. From 2007-2010, she wasglobally. She eventually became Chief Marketing Officer North America. From 2010 to 2015, she was President of Sparkling Beverages, and then President, and GM, North America Brands (2013-2015).American Brands. Ms. Bayne brings extensive strategic marketing and brand management experience to the Company. Throughout her career in leadership roles at Coca-Cola, Ms. Bayne acquired vast managerial and operational knowledge of the retail industry both domestically and internationally. Currently, Ms. Bayne is a membercurrently serves on the board of the Boarddirectors of Trustees of the Lovett School and a member of the Board of Visitors for Duke University Fuqua School of Business. In addition,The Honest Company, Inc. Ms. Bayne previously served on the board of directors of each of ANN (untiluntil its acquisition by the Company in August 2015) and2015, as well as Beazer Homes USA Inc.USA. Ms. Bayne is also served as a Trusteemember of the board of trustees of the American Film Institute and as a Board Memberthe Fuqua School of the Atlanta Women’s Foundation and the Atlanta Children’s Museum.

Business at Duke University.

Qualifications:

The Board selected Ms. Bayne to serve as a director based on her strong background in consumer strategy, retail and consumer marketing and consumer marketing.

brand management.


 PAUL KEGLEVIC
Age: 65
Director Since: 2019

Background:
PAUL KEGLEVIC has served on several boards of directors and related committees with experience across multiple industries including retail. Mr. Keglevic currently serves on the boards of directors of PetSmart, Inc.; Stellus Capital Investment Corp., and Bonanza Creek Energy Inc. Prior to his retirement in April 2018, Mr. Keglevic served as Chief Executive Officer (2016 to 2018) and Chief Financial Officer (2008 to 2016) of Energy Future Holdings Corp. Mr. Keglevic was a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers (“PWC”) from 2002 to 2008 and a member of their U.S. Leadership team. Prior to PWC, Mr. Keglevic was a partner and member of the U.S. Leadership team for Arthur Andersen.
 Qualifications:
The Board selected Mr. Keglevic to serve as a director based on his finance, merger and acquisition, transactional and governance experience.


LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.7920172019 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL ONE — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


KAY KRILL

Age: 62

Age: 64
Director Since:Since: 2015

Committees:
Compensation

Background:

KAY KRILL served as Chief Executive Officer of ANN, which was acquired by the Company onin August 21, 2015, from 2005 through October 31, 2015, and as President of ANN from 2004 through October 31, 2015. Ms. Krill also served as a member of the Board of Directors of ANN from 2004 until the date that it was acquired by the Company. From 2001 to 2004, Ms. Krill served as President of ANN’s LOFT Division. From 1998 to 2001, Ms. Krill was Executive Vice President, Merchandise and Design of ANN’s LOFT Division. From 1996 to 1998, Ms. Krill served as Senior Vice President, General Merchandise Manager of ANN’s LOFT Division and, from 1994 to 1996, she was Vice President of Merchandising for Ann Taylor. Prior to joining ANN, Ms. Krill held various management positions at several retailers including The Talbots, Inc. and Hartmarx Corporation.

Ms. Krill is also on the Breast Cancer Research Foundation Board of Directors, and previously served on the Boards of the National Retail Federation and St. Luke’s School in New Canaan, CT.

Qualifications:

The Board selected Ms. Krill to serve as a director based on her experience as the chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and board member of a publicly held specialty retailer, and her extensive experience in the apparel industry.


MARC LASRY

STACEY RAUCH

Age: 58

Age: 61
Director Since:Since: 2017

Committees:

    Compensation

Background:

MARC LASRY

re-joinedCommittees our Board in June 2017, having previously served as a member of the Board from February 2004 until October 2006. Since 1995, Mr. Lasry has served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer andCo-Founder: of Avenue Capital Group, a global investment firm that focuses on private and public debt, equity and real estate markets in the U.S., Europe and Asia. Prior to founding Avenue Capital Group, Mr. Lasryco-founded Amroc Investments, LLC in association with the Robert M. Bass Group and managed capital for Amroc Investments, L.P. (predecessor to Amroc Investments, LLC), a distressed debt investment firm. Prior to that, Mr. Lasry wasCo-Director of the Bankruptcy
Leadership and Corporate Reorganization Department at Cowen & Company. Mr. Lasry also served as Director of the Private Debt Department at Smith Vasiliou Management Company. Mr. Lasry clerked for the Honorable Edward Ryan, former Chief Bankruptcy Judge of the Southern District of New York. Mr. Lasry is currently a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and also serves on the board of directors of Boulevard Acquisition Corp. II and AgroFresh Solutions, Inc. He has served on the boards of advisors or directors of bothfor-profit andnot-for-profit public and private companies, including the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 92nd Street Y, the Clinton Global Initiative and the Global Endowment Management.

Governance (Chair)
Audit

Qualifications:

The Board selected Mr. Lasry to serve as a director based on his extensive capital allocation and investment experience with public and private companies.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.102017 Proxy Statement
Background:


PROPOSAL ONE — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

STACEY RAUCH

Age: 59

Director Since: 2017

Committees:

    Audit

Background:

STACEY RAUCH has served as thenon-executive Chairman of the board of directors of Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc. since February 2017, as a director of Fiesta Restaurant Group since 2012, Chair of Fiesta Restaurant Group’s Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee, and as a member of its Compensation Committee. Ms. Rauch is a Director (Senior Partner) Emeritus of McKinsey & Company, from which she retired in September 2010. Ms. Rauch was a leader in McKinsey’s Retail and Consumer Goods Practices, served as the head of the North American Retail and Apparel Practice, and acted as the Global Retail Practice Convener. A24-year veteran of McKinsey, Ms. Rauch led engagements for a wide range of retailers, apparel wholesalers and consumer goods manufacturers in the U.S. and internationally. Her areas of expertise include strategy, organization, marketing, merchandising, omnichannel management, global expansion, and retail store operations. Ms. Rauch was aco-founder of McKinsey’s New Jersey office, and was the first woman at McKinsey appointed as an industry practice leader. Prior to joining McKinsey, Ms. Rauch spent five years in product management for the General Foods Corporation. Ms. Rauch is also serves as a director of Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc., a global provider of executive search, leadership assessment and development services, where she sits on its Audit and Finance Committee, and as a non-executive director of Land Securities, Group, PLC, the UK’s largest commercial property company, where she sits on its Audit, Nomination and NominationRemuneration Committees. Previously, Ms. Rauch served on the board of directors of CEB, Inc., a leading member-based advisory company, ANN (which was acquired by the Company in August 2015), and Tops Holding Corporation, the parent company of Tops Markets LLC, a U.S. grocery retailer.

Qualifications:

The Board selected Ms. Rauch to serve as a director based on her extensive background in business strategy, marketing, merchandising and operations in the retail industry.




Ascena Retail Group, Inc.82019 Proxy Statement


Directors with Terms Expiring in 2020
Name of Director and AgeDirector
Since
Kate Buggeln, 582004
David Jaffe, 602001
Carl “Chuck” Rubin, 602015
John L. Welborn, Jr., 422018


KATE BUGGELN
Age: 58
Director Since: 2004
Committees:
Leadership and Corporate Governance
Compensation



Background:
KATE BUGGELN was appointed as Ascena’s Lead Independent Director on September 28, 2018. Currently, Ms. Buggeln serves as a member of the Board for publicly traded Five Below, Inc., and is a member of its Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. She also is on the Board of Noble Biomaterials, Scoop Holdings (parent company of cabi) and the nonprofit, Bpeace. Previously, Ms. Buggeln serves as a Senior Advisor with Irving Place Capital, L.P., and prior to that position was Senior Vice President of Strategy and Business Development for Coach, Inc., where she created and led strategies to enter new markets and new categories. Ms. Buggeln also spent many years as a retail consultant at LakeWest Group Ltd. and Coopers & Lybrand LLP, where she advised retail companies on business strategy, operations, e-commerce and supply chain. Previously, Ms. Buggeln served as a Director at Vitamin Shoppe, Stuart Weitzman and Timberland Company.
Qualifications:
The Board selected Ms. Buggeln to serve as a director based on her strong background in strategic planning, marketing and new business development.

DAVID JAFFE
Age: 60
Director Since: 2001

Background:
DAVID JAFFE presently serves as a member of the Board, and served as ascena’s CEO from 2002 to May 2019 and as Chairman of the Board from 2016 to 2019. Previously, he had been President from 2002 to 2017, and Vice Chairman and Chief Administrative Officer from 2000 to 2002. Mr. Jaffe joined ascena in 1992 as Vice President, Business Development and became Senior Vice President in 1995, Executive Vice President in 1996 and Vice Chairman in 2000. David is the son of Elliot S. and Roslyn S. Jaffe. Elliot S. Jaffe is a co-founder and Chairman Emeritus. Roslyn S. Jaffe is a co-founder and Director Emeritus for Life. David Jaffe is the brother of Elise Jaffe, a former non-executive officer and a more than 5% stockholder, and Richard Jaffe, a significant holder of ascena’s stock. Mr. Jaffe is a former member of the Board of Directors of The National Retail Federation.
Qualifications:
The Board selected Mr. Jaffe to serve as a director based on his extensive retail and financial background.

CARL “CHUCK” RUBIN
Age: 60
Director Since: 2015
Committees:
Audit (chair)
Compensation


Background:
CARL “CHUCK” RUBIN served as Chairman of the Board of The Michaels Companies, Inc. (“Michaels”) from 2015 to April 2019. He joined Michaels in 2013 and was its Chief Executive Officer from 2013 to February 2019. Prior to joining Michaels, from 2010 to 2013, Mr. Rubin was President and Chief Executive Officer of Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrances, Inc. Mr. Rubin held roles of increasing responsibility at Office Depot, serving as President beginning in 2006. Mr. Rubin spent six years in senior leadership roles, including Partner, at Accenture Consulting where he advised clients and led engagements across retail formats and ecommerce business. Prior to joining Accenture Consulting, Mr. Rubin held various management positions at several specialty retailers. Mr. Rubin was a member of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of The National Retail Federation from 2007 to 2010.
Qualifications:
The Board selected Mr. Rubin to serve as a director based on his extensive managerial and operational knowledge of the retail industry and his experience as a board member of a specialty retailer.


Ascena Retail Group, Inc.92019 Proxy Statement


JOHN L. WELBORN, JR.
Age: 42
Director Since: 2018
Committees:
Leadership and Corporate Governance
Audit


Background:
JOHN L. WELBORN, JR. serves as a Managing Director of Stadium Capital Management, LLC (“Stadium”), an investment advisory firm that focuses on smaller capitalized publicly traded companies in the U.S., Canada and Western Europe. In his role at Stadium, Mr. Welborn has led or supported Stadium’s due diligence across many different industries, including financial services, retail, software and business services. Mr. Welborn joined Stadium in 2000 as an Associate. Prior to joining Stadium, from 1998 to 2000, Mr. Welborn was a Financial Analyst at The Beacon Group, LLC, an investment and advisory firm that is now part of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. At Beacon, Mr. Welborn was a member of the Mergers & Acquisitions Group, focusing on financial services and consumer product companies and the Liquid Investments Committee. From 2012 to 2014, Mr. Welborn served as a director and member of the governance committee of Intermountain Community Bancorp and as a director of Panhandle State Bank, Inc. From 2009-2013, Mr. Welborn was a board observer of West Coast Bancorp.
Qualifications:
The Board selected Mr. Welborn to serve as a director based on his strong background in capital markets and investment experience.
Directors with Terms Expiring in 2021
Name of Director and AgeDirector
Since
Gary D. Begeman, 612019
Gary Muto, 602019
Carrie W. Teffner, 532018
Linda Yaccarino, 562016

GARY D. BEGEMAN
Age: 61
Director Since: 2019



Background:
GARY D. BEGEMAN has over 30 years of experience managing the legal support for a broad range of strategic, financing and commercial transactions for public and private companies. He has served as an independent director on boards of directors of a number of privately owned companies including SolAero Technologies Corp. (since November 2018), Toys “R” Us Property Company II, LLC (from August 2017 to December 2018) and Sequa Corporation (from February 2016 to May 2017). He is also Chair and a director of the University of South Dakota Foundation. He was previously Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of NII Holdings, Inc., a publicly-traded wireless telecommunications company operating in Latin America, from November 2006 to October 2015. From August 2003 to September 2006, Mr. Begeman was Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel at Sprint Corporation and before that, he was Vice President and Deputy General Counsel at Nextel Communications. Prior to that, Mr. Begeman was General Counsel at XO Communications, Inc., and was a Partner at the Jones Day law firm, focusing on capital formation and mergers and acquisitions.
Qualifications:
The Board selected Mr. Begeman to serve as a director based on his strong legal background and work with public and private companies.

GARY MUTO
Age: 60
Director Since: 2019
Background:
GARY MUTO serves as a director and our Chief Executive Officer (since 2019) and served as President and Chief Executive Officer - ascena brands from August 2017 to May 2019.   Mr. Muto joined ANN INC. (ascena retail group, inc.) in 2008 as President of LOFT. In 2013, he assumed responsibility for leading the AnnTaylor, LOFT and Lou & Grey brands. During the period 1998 to 2007, Mr. Muto held several leadership roles at Gap, Inc., including President of Banana Republic and President of Gap brands. While at Gap, Inc., Mr. Muto also launched the specialty brand, Forth & Towne.
Qualifications:
The Board selected Mr. Muto to serve as a director based on his extensive retail background.


Ascena Retail Group, Inc.102019 Proxy Statement


CARRIE W. TEFFNER
Age: 53
Director Since: 2018

Background:
CARRIE W. TEFFNER currently serves as our Interim Executive Chair of the Board since May 2019. Ms. Teffner served as Executive Vice President Finance and Strategic Projects of Crocs, Inc. (“Crocs”) from August 2018 to April 2019, and served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Crocs from December 2015 to August 2018.  Prior to joining Crocs, Ms. Teffner served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PetSmart, Inc. from 2013 to 2015 until it was sold to BC Partners, where she was responsible for finance and information technology.  Ms. Teffner also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Weber Stephen Products LLC from 2011 to 2013.  From 2009 to 2011, Ms. Teffner served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Timberland Company until it was sold to VF Corporation.  Ms. Teffner spent the first 21 years of her career with Sara Lee Corporation where she held various domestic and international positions including divisional and segment Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.  Ms. Teffner also serves as a director and Audit Committee Chair for GameStop Corp. since August 2018.  Ms. Teffner served as a director and the Audit Committee Chair for Banfield, The Pet Hospital, from 2014 to 2015, and as a director of Crocs for six months during 2015 prior to her appointment as its Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.  Ms. Teffner also served as a director of the nonprofit community revitalization organization, Rebuilding Together, from 2013 to 2019.
Qualifications:
The Board selected Ms. Teffner to serve as a director based on her extensive strategic, financial and operational expertise and background in financial reporting and internal controls for large, publicly held product and retail companies.

LINDA YACCARINO
Age: 56
Director Since: 2016
Committees:
Compensation (chair)
Leadership and Corporate Governance

Background:
LINDA YACCARINO is Chairman, Advertising and Client Partnerships for NBCUniversal, LLC (“NBCUniversal”) since 2011. In this role Ms. Yaccarino oversees all market strategy and advertising revenue totaling nearly $10 billion, for NBCUniversal’s entire portfolio of broadcast, cable and digital assets. Prior to joining NBCUniversal in 2011, she held roles of increasing responsibility from 1996 to 2011 at Turner Broadcast System, Inc. (“Turner”), serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Turner Entertainment Advertising, Sales and Marketing, and Acquisitions beginning in 2009. Prior to joining Turner, Ms. Yaccarino held various management positions at several media sales outlets.
Qualifications:
The Board selected Ms. Yaccarino to serve as a director based on her extensive digital knowledge, multiplatform consumer engagement background and transformation experience.
Compensation and Stock Incentive Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During fiscal 2017,2019, Linda Yaccarino, Kay Krill, Carl Rubin, Randy L. PearceCarrie W. Teffner and Linda YaccarinoKate Buggeln served as members of our Compensation Committee. No member of the Compensation and Stock Incentive Committee (referred to as our “Compensation Committee”). No member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of the Company during the portion of fiscal 20172019 that he or she served as a member of the Compensation Committee or was formerly an officer or employee of the Company.Company, except for Ms. Krill who previously served as President and CEO of ANN until her retirement on October 31, 2015. No executive officer of the Company served during fiscal 20172019 as a director or member of a compensation committee of any entity at which any of its executive officers served on the Board, or the Compensation Committee, of the Company. Marc Lasry becameOn May 1, 2019, in connection with her appointment as Interim Executive Chair of the Board, Ms. Teffner stepped down as a member of the Compensation Committee, in early fiscal 2018.

but continues to serve as a member of the Board.


LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.1120172019 Proxy Statement



QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT OUR BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS


What is the makeup of the Board and how often are members elected?

Our Board currently has tentwelve members, divided into three classes, each with a staggered three-year term of office. ThreeFour directors, David Jaffe, Kate BuggelnKatie J. Bayne, Paul Keglievic, Kay Krill and Carl Rubin,Stacey Rauch, whose terms are expiring as of the date of the Annual Meeting, shall stand for election this year. The Company’sCo-Founder, Mr. Elliot S. Jaffe, retired asNon-Executive Chairman of the Board, member of the Board and as an officer of the Company at the end of our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on December 8, 2016.

How often did the Board meet in fiscal 2017?

2019?

The Board met fourseven times during fiscal 20172019 and otherwise accomplished its business through the work of the committees described below. During fiscal 2017,2019, each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and of the standing committees of which he or she was a member during his or her tenure.

Do thenon-management directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions?

Yes. Thenon-management members of our Board meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions without any members of management present.

Does the Company have any formal policies or requirements concerning Board Leadership?

We do not have a formal policy regarding the separation of our Chairman of the Board (“Chairman”) and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) positions. Following Elliot S.David Jaffe’s retirement asNon-Executive CEO and Chairman on May 1, 2019, the Board appointed Gary Muto as CEO and a member of the Board, and Carrie W. Teffner as an officerInterim Executive Chair of the Company, on December 8, 2016 the Board announced the appointment of David Jaffe, our Chief Executive Officer, as Chairman. We believe thisBoard. Our current leadership structure benefits our Company, as a combined Chairman/CEO role helps provide strong, unified leadership for our management teampermits Mr. Muto to focus his attention on managing the Company’s business and its strategic priorities, while Ms. Teffner leads the Board.

The Company also believes that strong, independent Board leadership is a critical aspect of effective corporate governance. Accordingly, in March 2015, the BoardIn September 2018, Ms. Buggeln was appointed Mr. Pearce to serve as the Company’s Lead Independent Director. As specified in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the responsibilities of the Lead Independent Director are as follows:

consult with the Chairman as to an appropriate schedule of Board meetings;

consult with the Chairman regarding, and approve the information, agenda and schedules of, the meetings of the Board;Board and its committees;

call meetings of the independent directors, as appropriate;

serve as chairman of the executive sessions of the independent directors;

serve as liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman and between the independent directors and senior management;

ensure that independent directors have adequate opportunities to meet and discuss issues in sessions of the independent directors without management present;

chair the meetings of the Board when the Chairman or CEO is not present;

recommend to the Board the retention of advisors and consultants who report directly to the Board; and

respond to questions and comments from major stockholders that are directed to the Lead Independent Director or to the independent directors as a group, with such consultation with the Chairman and other directors as may be appropriate.

We believe that a single leaderthe Company’s new leadership structure, with Ms. Teffner serving as ChairmanInterim Executive Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, together with a Lead Independent Director,Mr. Muto serving as CEO, is the best governance model for our Company its stockholders and our stockholdersstakeholders at this time.

How does the Board determine which directors are independent?

Our Board determines whether an individual director satisfies all of the independence standards of the SEC and the NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market, as such standards may be amended from time to time, and also that the director has no material relationship with us (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of any entity) that would be inconsistent with a finding of independence.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.122017 Proxy Statement


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT OUR BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Which directors have been designated as independent?

The Board affirmatively determined that Katie J. Bayne, Gary D. Begeman, Kate Buggeln, Paul Keglevic, Kay Krill, Marc Lasry, Randy L. Pearce, Carl Rubin, Stacey Rauch, Carl RubinCarrie W. Teffner (prior to Ms. Teffner’s appointment as Interim Executive Chair of the Board on May 1, 2019), John L. Welborn, Jr. and Linda Yaccarino are “independent,” as defined under Rule 5605(a)(2) of The NASDAQNasdaq Stock Market.

Mr. Pearce resigned from the Board effective as of October 4, 2018, and Mr. Lasry resigned from the Board effective as of June 30, 2019.


Ascena Retail Group, Inc.122019 Proxy Statement


What are the standing committees of the Board?

Our Board has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee (formerly known as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee) and the Compensation and Stock Incentive Committee (referred to as our “Compensation Committee”).

Committee.

Who are the current members of the standing committees?

 
Audit
Committee

Audit

Compensation and Stock
Incentive
Committee

Leadership and
Corporate Governance
Committee
Katie J. Bayne 

Leadership and

Corporate Governance

Committee

a2019proxyimage5a01.jpg 
 

Compensation

Committee

  

Katie J. Bayne

Gary D. Begeman
 

LOGO

  

Kate Buggeln

 

LOGO

LOGO

  

David Jaffe

Kate Buggeln     a2019proxyimage6a01.jpg
 
a2019proxyimage5a01.jpg
a2019proxyimage5a01.jpg
 
  

Steven L. Kirshenbaum

David Jaffe
 
  

Kay Krill

 
  

Marc Lasry

Paul Keglevic
 

LOGO

  

Randy L. Pearce    LOGO     L

 

LOGO

LOGO

  

Stacey Rauch

Kay Krill
 

LOGO

a2019proxyimage5a01.jpg
 
 
  

Carl Rubin

Gary Muto
 

LOGO

LOGO

  

Linda Yaccarino

   

LOGO

Stacey Rauch
a2019proxyimage5a01.jpg
 

LOGO

a2019proxyimage28.jpg
Carl Rubin    a2019proxyimage9a01.jpg
a2019proxyimage28.jpg
a2019proxyimage5a01.jpg
Carrie W. Teffner    
John L. Welborn, Jr.     a2019proxyimage9a01.jpg
a2019proxyimage7a01.jpg
a2019proxyimage7a01.jpg
Linda Yaccarino
a2019proxyimage28.jpg
a2019proxyimage7a01.jpg

LOGO
a2019proxyimage28.jpg  Chairperson
a2019proxyimage27.jpg  Member
LOGO   Member

LOGO   Financial Expert

a2019proxyimage26.jpgL  Lead Independent Director
a2019proxyimage25.jpg  Financial Expert

Are all of the members of the standing committees independent?

Yes. The Board has determined that the members of each of the standing committees are independent pursuant to applicable SEC and NASDAQNasdaq Stock Market rules.

Do all of the standing committees operate under a written charter?

Yes. The charters of each of the standing committees are posted on the “for investors”“Investors” page of the Company’s website at www.ascenaretail.com, accessible through the “Investor Relations Menu.”

“Corporate Governance” tab.

What are the functions of the standing committees?

Audit Committee

It is the responsibility of the Audit Committee to assist the Board in its oversight of our financial accounting and reporting practices. The duties of the Audit Committee include: (i) monitoring ourinclude reviewing the quality and integrity of the financial statements, reports and other financial information provided by the Company to the public, the Company’s systems of internal controls regarding financial reporting, process and system of internal controls; (ii) selecting our independent registered public accounting firm; (iii) monitoring the independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm and internal auditing function; and (iv) providing an avenue of communication among the independent registered public accounting firm, management, the internal auditing functionsaudit function, the processes for monitoring enterprise risk, and the Board.Company’s auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes generally. The Audit Committee has the authority to conduct any investigation appropriate to fulfilling its responsibilities, and it has direct access to our independent registered public accounting firm as well as our internal auditors. The Audit Committee has the ability to retain, at our expense, special legal, accounting or other consultants or experts it deems necessary in the performance of its duties. The Audit Committee also prepared the Audit Committee Report for inclusion in the proxy statement. See “Audit Committee Report.” The Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are “independent,” as required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the listing standards of The NASDAQNasdaq Stock Market and meet the “financial sophistication” requirement within the meanings of The NASDAQNasdaq Stock Market rules, and has also determined that Mr. Pearce qualifiesRubin and Mr. Welborn qualify as an “audit committee financial expert,experts,” as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of RegulationS-K.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.132017 Proxy Statement


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT OUR BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee

The function of the Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee is to assist the Board by (i) identifying qualified individuals to become Board members, and recommending for selection by the Board the director nominees to stand for election at the next annual meeting of the Company’s

Ascena Retail Group, Inc.132019 Proxy Statement


stockholders, (ii) recommending the composition of the Board and its committees, (iii) reviewing and recommending changes to the Board, as may be required, with respect to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and the corporate governance policies and practices of the Company, (iv) leading the Board in its annual review of the Board’s performance, (v) reviewing the succession planning recommendations for certain of the Company’s senior officers, and (vi) advising the Board regarding diversity and inclusion matters.

The responsibilities and duties of the Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee also include advising the Board with respect to the charters, structure and operations of the various committees of the Board and qualifications for membership thereon, including any independence standards for committee membership.
The Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee also makes recommendations to the Board regarding which directors should serve on the various committees of the Board.

The Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee utilizes a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating director candidates. Candidates may come to the attention of the Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee through current directors, members of management, stockholders or other persons. From time to time, the Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee may also engage a search firm to assist in identifying potential Board candidates, although no such firm was used to identify any of the director nominees proposed for election at the Annual Meeting. Once the Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee has identified a prospective nominee, the Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates the prospective nominee against the standards and qualifications set out in the Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee’s charter and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, including the individual’s potential contributions in providing advice and guidance to the Board and management. The Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to identify nominees who possess a wide range of experience, skills, areas of expertise, knowledge and business judgment. The Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates all candidates for director, regardless of the person or firm recommending such candidate. In considering director nominees to stand for election or to fill any vacancy, the Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board take into account, in addition to such other factors as they deem relevant, such factors as the desirability of selecting directors who are accomplished in their respective fields, with superior credentials and reputation, are believed to have (i) relevant expertise and experience upon the basis of which such person could offer advice and guidance to management and (ii) sufficient time available to devote to the affairs of the Company, are believed to be able to work with the other members of the Board, are believed to be able to represent thelong-term interests of the Company’s stockholders as a whole, and are selected with a view to the Board being diverse and representing a range of backgrounds and experience. The Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board also consider all applicable legal and regulatory requirements, as well as any requirements under the Company’s SecondThird Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, andby-laws that govern the composition of the Board as from time to time in effect.

The Board, with the advice and recommendation of the Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee, determines the total number of directors and selects nominees with a view to maintaining a Board that is strong in its collective knowledge and has a diversity of not only skills and experience, but also diversity in gender, culture and geography. The Board and Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee assess the effectiveness of the Company’s diversity policies by reviewing the nominees for director to determine if such nominees satisfy the Company’sthen-current needs.

The Board, the Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee and the Company are committed to diversity and inclusion and recognize the benefits diversity and inclusion can contribute to achieving the Company’s goals. Accordingly, the Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for advising the Board regarding diversity and inclusion matters in an effort to promote, foster and nurture a diverse and inclusive workforce, culture and provision of services at the Company.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, a copy of which is posted on the “for investors”“Investors” page of the Company’s website at www.ascenaretail.com, accessible through the “Investor Relations” menu.“Corporate Governance” tab. The Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board in carrying out the Corporate Governance Guidelines, monitors the compliance by the Board and its committees with the Corporate Governance Guidelines, and, from time to time as it deems appropriate, reviews and reassesses the adequacy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines and recommends any proposed revisions to the Corporate Governance Guidelines to the Board for approval. The Corporate Governance Guidelines address topics such as (i) Board size, (ii) Board meetings and agendas, (iii) committees, (iv) Board leadership structure, (v) lead independent director, (vi) executive sessions of independent directors, (vii) director qualifications and attributes, (viii) director

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.142017 Proxy Statement


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT OUR BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

independence, (ix) director selection, (x) majority approval vote in uncontested director elections, (xi) director orientation, (xii) director access to officers and employees, (xiii) director responsibilities, (xiv) changes in directors’ principal occupation, position or responsibility, (xv) outside directorships, (xvi) stockholder communications with the Board, (xvii) consideration of director candidates nominated by stockholders, (xviii) director compensation, (xix) restrictions on hedging and pledging transactions, (xx) annual evaluation of the Company’s chief executive officerCEO and succession planning, and (xxi) annual evaluation of the Board.









Ascena Retail Group, Inc.142019 Proxy Statement


Compensation Committee

The function of the Compensation Committee is to assist the Board by: (i) evaluating and determining all matters relating to the compensation (including base salary, incentive compensation and equity-based awards) of our Chairmanthe CEO, Interim Executive Chair of the Board and CEO, our other executive officers (including the named executive officers)officers and our former Chairman and CEO until his retirement) and certain other key executives and employees; (ii) administering and functioning as the committee that is authorized to grant stock options, restricted stock and/or restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and other equity-based and incentive awards to executive officers and such other key executives and employees as the Compensation Committee shall determine under our stock and cash incentive plans, including the Company’s 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, amended and restated effective December 10, 2015 (formerly known as the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan)amended (the “Omnibus Incentive Plan”) and as the committee authorized to grant awards under other incentive plans applicable to the executive officers of the Company as in effect from time to time; and (iii) reviewing and reporting to the Board on such other matters as may be appropriately delegated by the Board for the Compensation Committee’s consideration.

The Compensation Committee has sole authority to retain and obtain the advice of compensation consultants, outside legal counsel and other advisers, each referred to herein as an “Adviser,” to assist it with the execution of its duties and responsibilities. The Compensation Committee has the authority to set the compensation and other terms and conditions and oversee the work of the Advisers, to receive appropriate funding from the Company for the payment of compensation to the Advisers and to terminate the services of an Adviser. In selecting Advisers, the Compensation Committee will take into account factors it considers appropriate or as may be required by law, regulation or under the NASDAQNasdaq listing standards.

Since 2010, Radford Consulting, a separate business unit of Aon Consulting and a separate division of Aon Hewitt Corporation (“Radford”),

In fiscal 2018, following an independent compensation consultant, has met regularly withextensive search process, the Compensation Committee selected and provides it with advice regardingengaged Semler Brossy Consulting Group, LLC (“SBCG”) as the design and implementation of our executiveCompensation Committee’s independent compensation program. Radford’s support during fiscal 2017 included a number of topics, including pay levels and designconsultant. SBCG continues to serve as well as our ongoing alignment with ourthe Compensation Committee’s independent compensation philosophy. Management did not specifically recommend Radford, and Radford and its affiliates do not provide any services other than executive compensation consulting services to the Company.consultant. The Compensation Committee has determined that Radford doesSBCG did not have any conflict of interest in its dealings with the Compensation Committee (or the Company). The Compensation Committee made this determination, in part, by reviewing and considering the factors set out by the applicable SEC rules and NASDAQNasdaq listing standards addressing compensation advisor conflicts of interest.

In providing its services to the Compensation Committee, with the Compensation Committee’s knowledge, Radford contacted the Company’s management from time to time to obtain data and other information from the Company and worked together with management and its advisor in the development of proposals and alternatives for the Compensation Committee to review and consider.

The Compensation Committee intends to regularly evaluateevaluates the nature and scope of the services provided by Radford.SBCG. In order to ensure that Radford isSBCG remains independent, RadfordSBCG is only engaged by, takes direction from, and reports to the Compensation Committee and, accordingly, only the Compensation Committee has the right to terminate or replace RadfordSBCG at any time.

Management has retained Korn Ferry Hay Group, Inc. (“Hay Group”) as their compensation consultant. Hay Group and its affiliates do not provide services other than compensation consulting services to the Company. Hay Group participated in Compensation Committee meetings throughout fiscal 2017 to provide retail executive compensation knowledge and expertise and participated in discussions regarding executive compensation, the peer group selection process and executive compensation trends, among other activities. The Compensation Committee has determined that Hay Group does not have any conflict of interest in its dealings with management, the Compensation Committee or the Company. This determination was made, in part, by reviewing and considering the factors set out by the applicable SEC rules and NASDAQ listing standards addressing compensation advisor conflicts of interest.

How many times did each standing committee meet in fiscal 2017?

2019?

During fiscal 2017,2019, the Audit Committee met nineeight times, the Compensation Committee met eightnine times and the Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee met foursix times.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.152017 Proxy Statement


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT OUR BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

What is the Board’s role in the risk oversight process?

It is management’s responsibility to manage risk and bring to the Board’s attention risks that are material to the Company. The Board exercises its oversight of the Company’s risks through regular reports to the Board from David Jaffe, in his role as Chairman andour CEO, our Interim Executive Chair of the Board and other members of senior management on areas of material risk, actions and strategies to mitigate those risks and the effectiveness of those actions and strategies. The Board also administers its risk oversight function through its Audit and Compensation Committees.

The Audit Committee discusses with management the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control those risks. Members of senior management with responsibility for oversight of particular risks report to the Audit Committee periodically throughout the year. The Company’s chief internal audit executive annually prepares a comprehensive risk assessment report which identifies the material business risks (including strategic, operational, financial reporting and compliance risks) for the Company as a whole, as well as for each business unit,operating segment, and identifies the controls that address and mitigate those risks. The chief internal audit executive reviews that report with the Audit Committee each year. The Audit Committee reports to the full Board annually, or more frequently as required, on its review of the Company’s risk management.

The Compensation Committee establishes our executive compensation programs in a balanced and diversified manner while also creating significant, yet appropriate, incentives for strong performance based on our business and strategic plan. In most cases, each component of our performance-based compensation program is subject to a limit on the cash paid or the number of shares delivered. We believe that our compensation programs reflect aan appropriate balance ofshort-term,long-term, guaranteed and performance-based compensation in order not to encourage excessiverisk-taking. A significant portion of our compensation program includes performance-based compensation with multi-year performance targets and vesting.equity-based compensation. We believe that this helps to ensure that our NEOs and other employees focus on the health of our business and the success of broad performance metrics that will deliver stockholder value over time and discourages excessexcessive risk-taking by our NEOs and other employees. The Compensation Committee also evaluates on a regular basis our overall mix of equity-based incentive awards relative to cash-based incentive awards to align our executive’sexecutives’ incentives with stockholder interests andlong-term value.


Ascena Retail Group, Inc.152019 Proxy Statement


How does the Board evaluate director candidates recommended by stockholders?

The Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee does not evaluate stockholder nominees differently than any other nominee. Pursuant to policies set forth in our Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee Charter and Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee will consider stockholder nominations for directors if we receive timely written notice, in proper form, of the intent to make a nomination at a meeting of stockholders. To be timely for the 20182019 Annual Meeting, the notice must be received within the time frame discussed above under the heading “How do stockholders submit proposals for the Company’s 20182019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders?” To be in proper form, the notice must, among other things, include each nominee’s written consent to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected, the number of shares held of record and beneficially owned by the nominee, and any other information relating to the nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for the election of directors, or is otherwise required pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.162017 Proxy Statement


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT OUR BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

How are directors compensated?

Cash Compensation

General Philosophy
For fiscal 2017, we paid2019, total compensation for ournon-employee Board members as follows:

   Fee 

An annual fee

  $80,000 

Annual fees to each committee member (excluding committee chairs) are as follows:

 

Audit Committee

  $15,000 

Compensation Committee

  $12,500 

Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee

  $10,000 

Annual fees to the committee chairs and lead independent director are as follows:

 

Audit Committee Chair

  $25,000 

Compensation Committee Chair

  $20,000 

Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee Chair

  $15,000 

Lead Independent Director

  $30,000 

was within a competitive range of the peer group median. The peer group used to assess the competitiveness of non-employee director compensation is identified under “Peer Group” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. During fiscal 2019, our non-employee directors received an annual cash retainer, committee fees, and an annual equity retainer.

The Board, in consultation with SBGC, the Company’sCompensation Committee’s compensation consultant, analyzes the Company’s Board compensation in comparison to its peer group, and determines on an annual basis whether to adjustrecommend any adjustments in Board compensation.

Equity Compensation

The Company generally makes equity grants of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) on an annual cycle in September, which vest oncompensation to theone-year anniversary of the grant date. The following RSU grants Board. No changes were made to ournon-employee directors inthe structure or design of the Company’s Board compensation for fiscal 2017:

Director

Number of Restricted
Stock Units Granted
1

Katie Bayne

16,010

Kate Buggeln

16,010

Elliot Jaffe

16,010

Steven Kirshenbaum

28,353

Katherine Krill

16,010

Marc Lasry

17,857

Randy Pearce

16,010

Stacey Rauch

17,857

Carl Rubin

28,353

Linda Yaccarino

12,859

(1)In addition to the annual grant of 16,010 RSUs made in September 2016, both Messrs. Kirshenbaum and Rubin received a second grant of RSUs in December 2016 in recognition of their service as directors in fiscal 2016. Neither Mr. Kirshenbaum nor Mr. Rubin received RSUs during fiscal 2016. The RSUs granted to Mr. Lasry and Ms. Rauch were awarded in June 2017 in connection with their appointment to the Board at that time. The RSUs to Ms. Yaccarino were granted in December 2016 in connection with her October 2016 appointment to the Board. All of these RSUs vest one year from the grant date.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.172017 Proxy Statement
2019.


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT OUR BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

David Jaffe, our former Chairman and CEO, doesand Gary Muto, our current CEO and director, did not receive any additional cash or equity compensation for histheir service as directors in fiscal 2019 while serving as executive officers of the Company and members of the Board. Following her appointment as Interim Executive Chair of the Board on May 1, 2019, Ms. Teffner did not receive any additional compensation for her service as a director.director in fiscal 2019. Compensation paid to Mr. Jaffe and Ms. Teffner for histheir service as an executive officernon-employee directors during fiscal 20172019 is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in the Compensation and Discussion Analysis.

Analysis, along with compensation paid to them for their service as executive officers during fiscal 2019.

Cash Compensation
For fiscal 2017, total compensation for2019, we paid ournon-employee Board members was in line with our target total compensation objective to be within or about the 62nd percentile of the peer group utilized in determining the compensation of our named executive officers. The peer group is identified under “Peer Group” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

as follows:
Fee
Annual Board Cash RetainerLOGO$80,000
Annual fees to each committee member (excluding committee chairs) are as follows:
Audit Committee$15,000
Compensation Committee$12,500
Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee$10,000
Annual fees to the committee chairs and lead independent director are as follows:
Audit Committee Chair$25,000
Compensation Committee Chair$20,000
Leadership and Corporate Governance Committee Chair$15,000
Lead Independent Director$30,000


Ascena Retail Group, Inc.161820172019 Proxy Statement



Equity Compensation

The Company generally makes equity grants of RSUs to our directors on an annual cycle in September or October, which vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant date. We generally provide an annual equity retainer of $130,000 for service on our Board; however, for a second consecutive year, the value of RSU awards to directors was reduced by 30% to align with actions taken for our NEOs (other than Ms. Hufford), who also received a 30% reduction to their annual long-term incentive grants for fiscal 2019 (as described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below). We discounted the RSU grants to our directors in order to conserve shares during a period of depressed share price. The following RSU grants were made to our non-employee directors in fiscal 2019:

Director
Number of Restricted    
Stock Units Granted
(1)
Katie J. Bayne24,138
Kate Buggeln24,138
Steven Kirshenbaum(2)
24,138
Katherine Krill24,138
Marc Lasry(2)
24,138
Randy Pearce(3)
24,138
Stacey Rauch24,138
Carl Rubin24,138
Carrie W. Teffner24,138
John L. Welborn, Jr.(4)
34,067
Linda Yaccarino24,138

(1)RSUs granted to non-employee directors in fiscal 2019 vest one year from the grant date.
(2)Messrs. Kirshenbaum and Lasry resigned as members of the Board effective as of June 30, 2019.
(3)Mr. Peace retired as a member of the Board on October 4, 2018.
(4)Mr. Welborn received a pro-rated portion of the reduced fiscal 2018 RSU award, in addition to the reduced fiscal 2019 RSU award.

Changes for Fiscal 2020
For fiscal 2020, non-employee directors will receive an equity award of 24,000 stock options, which is approximately equal to the number of RSUs granted to non-employee directors in fiscal 2019. The equity award for our directors was changed to a fixed grant of stock options to align with the actions taken for our NEOs, who will receive a fixed number of stock options in fiscal 2020 (as described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below). The decision to grant a fixed number of stock options, rather than calculate awards based on a grant date fair value, is intended to preserve shares under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. In a depressed share price environment, it is critical that we control share usage and dilution as well as avoid granting potential windfall awards to our directors and NEOs. Further, granting stock options to our non-employee directors is intended to align actual pay with Company performance, as our non-employee directors will only realize value if we achieve strong stock price performance and deliver value to our stockholders. Cash compensation for our directors is unchanged for fiscal 2020. The Board also determined that the compensation for Messrs. Begeman and Keglevic, who joined the Board in September 2019, would consist of a $250,000 cash retainer and no equity award.



Ascena Retail Group, Inc.172019 Proxy Statement


FISCAL 20172019 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE


The following table provides each element ofnon-employee director compensation for fiscal 2017.

Name

  Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
   RSU Awards
($)
(1)
   All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 

Katie Bayne

   90,000    94,619       184,619 

Kate Buggeln

   110,000    94,619       204,619 

Elliot Jaffe(2)

       94,619    377,956(3)   472,575 

Steven Kirshenbaum

   80,000    194,721       274,721 

Kay Krill

   80,000    94,619       174,619 

Marc Lasry(4)

       32,410       32,410 

Randy L. Pearce

   147,500    94,619       242,119 

Stacey Rauch(5)

       32,410       32,410 

Carl Rubin

   111,250    194,721       305,971 

Linda Yaccarino(6)

   75,426    104,286       179,712 

2019.

Name(1)
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
RSU Awards
($)
(2)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total
($)
Katie J. Bayne90,00091,000181,000
Kate Buggeln129,86391,000220,863
Steven Kirshenbaum(3)
72,44491,000163,444
Kay Krill86,25091,000177,250
David Jaffe(4)
Marc Lasry(3)
72,44491,000163,444
Randy L. Pearce(5)
23,81923,819
Stacey Rauch106,37491,000197,374
Carl Rubin115,65391,000206,653
Carrie W. Teffner(6)
John L. Welborn, Jr.(7)
98,956128,432227,388
Linda Yaccarino104,45891,000195,458

(1)Messrs. Begeman and Keglevic joined the Board effective September 30, 2019.
(2)Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of RSU awards calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the valuation of equity based awards are discussed in “Stock-Based Compensation” in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2017.August 3, 2019.

(2)Mr. Jaffe retired
(3)Messrs. Kirshenbaum and Lasry resigned asNon-Executive Chairman members of the Board effective as of June 30, 2019.
(4)Compensation received by Mr. Jaffe for his service as a non-employee director during fiscal 2019 following his retirement as an employee of the Company effective June 28, 2019 is reported in the Summary Compensation Table.
(5)Mr. Pearce retired as a member of the Board and as an officer of the Company at the end of our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on December 8, 2016.October 4, 2018.

(3)Mr. Jaffe’s other compensation is comprised
(6)Ms. Teffner was appointed Interim Executive Chair of base salary of $187,855, Company match to his Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of $10,934 and payments for supplemental retirement benefits of $179,167.

(4)Mr. Lasry joined the Board effective June 8, 2017.

(5)May 1, 2019. As of that date, Ms. Rauch joinedTeffner receives no additional compensation for her service as a member of the Board. Compensation received by Ms. Teffner in respect of her service as a non-employee director (including the “Teffner Director RSU” discussed in the Summary Compensation Table below) and in respect of her service as Interim Executive Chair of the Board effective June 8, 2017.is reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

(6)Ms. Yaccarino joined
(7)Mr. Welborn received a pro-rated portion of the Board effective October 11, 2016.reduced fiscal 2018 RSU award, in addition to the reduced fiscal 2019 RSU award.


Ascena Retail Group, Inc.182019 Proxy Statement


As of July 29, 2017,August 3, 2019, the aggregate number of RSUs and stock options held by eachnon-employee director was:

Name

  Number of
RSUs
   Number of
Options
 

Katie Bayne

   24,482     

Kate Buggeln

   24,239    70,002 

Elliot Jaffe

   0   

Steven Kirshenbaum

   28,353     

Kay Krill

   24,482     

Marc Lasry

   17,857     

Randy L. Pearce

   24,239    70,000 

Stacey Rauch

   17,857     

Carl Rubin

   28,353     

Linda Yaccarino

   12,859     


NameNumber of
RSUs
Number of
Options
Katie J. Bayne24,138
Kate Buggeln24,138
David Jaffe(1)
Steven Kirshenbaum24,138
Kay Krill24,138
Marc Lasry
Randy L. Pearce
Stacey Rauch24,138
Carl Rubin24,138
John L. Welborn, Jr.34,067
Linda Yaccarino24,138

(1)The aggregate number of outstanding stock options held by Mr. Jaffe are reported in the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End” table below.
Are directors and executive officers required to own a minimum amount of the Company shares of common stock?

Our Board believes it is important that ournon-employee directors and executive officers have, and are recognized both internally and externally as having,long-term financial interests that are aligned with those of our stockholders. In fiscal 2012, pursuant to the recommendation of the

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.192017 Proxy Statement


FISCAL 2017 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

Compensation Committee, the Board adopted stock ownership guidelines for our CEO andnon-employee directors (the “Ownership Guidelines”). In June 2016, the Ownership Guidelines were amended and restated to, among other things, expand the group of persons subject to the Ownership Guidelines to include all members of our leadership team, including each of the Company’s executive officers (other than Elliot S. Jaffe, who retired effective at the end of the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders) and presidents of each of the Company’s brands. The Ownership Guidelines with respect to our CEO became effective in September 2011, with respect to ournon-employee directors, became effective on December 7, 2011, and with respect to all such other members of Company leadership, became effective on June 2, 2016. See “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Stock Ownership Guidelines for Executive Officers” below for a discussion of the Ownership Guidelines as amended and restated, with regard to our CEO and all such other members of Company leadership.

leadership, and each NEO’s current progress towards achieving the guidelines.

Under the Ownership Guidelines,non-employee directors are required to hold (determined annually as of the last day of the prior fiscal year) three times their annual cash retainer (currently $80,000 per annum, for a total of $240,000).

The Ownership Guidelines authorize a transition period fornon-employee directors to achieve the three-time ownership level of five years from the later of December 7, 2011 and the date the director commences service on our Board. As of August 3, 2019, Mr. Jaffe, Ms. Bayne, Ms. Buggeln and Ms. Krill satisfied the Ownership Guidelines. The remaining non-employee directors are still within the transition period to satisfy the Ownership Guidelines.
Ownership includes: (i) shares of our stock acquired on the open market or purchased through the exercise of stock options or settlement of any other type of equity award (such as restricted stock, RSUs, deferred stock or a deferred stock unit); (ii) vested equity awards (other than stock options or stock appreciation awards); (iii) vested shares of our stock allocated under anytax-qualified plan (althoughnon-employee directors may not participate in the 401(k) plans, if a director previously was an employee and participated in the plan, such shares would count as “owned”); and (iv) unvested RSUs (but excluding unvested performance-based equity awards). Shares held individually or jointly or by a “family member” (as defined in the securities laws which would include certain trusts, family partnerships and foundations) would count as “owned” by thenon-employee director. StockVested and unvested stock option awards do not count towards the stock ownership requirement. The Ownership Guidelines, as amended and restated, are posted on the “for investors”“investors” page of the Company’s website at www.ascenaretail.com, accessible through the “Investor Relations Menu.”

Does the Company maintain Indemnification Agreements with the members of the Board and Executive Officers?

Yes, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements (collectively, the “Indemnification Agreements”) with each of the members of the Board. Ascena also entered into Indemnification Agreements with Brian Lynch, President and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), Robb Giammatteo,Gary Muto, CEO, Carrie W. Teffner, Interim Executive Chair of the Board, Dan Lamadrid, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), John Pershing, Executiveand Wendy Hufford, Senior Vice President Chief Human Resources Officer (“CHRO”), and Duane D. Holloway, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary.Counsel. The Indemnification Agreements supplement the Company’s SecondThird Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, andthe Company’s by-laws and Delaware law in providing certain indemnification rights to these individuals. The Indemnification Agreements provide, among other things, that we will indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law and to any greater extent that Delaware law may in the future permit, including the advancement of attorneys’ fees and other expenses incurred by such individuals in connection with any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or other proceeding,

Ascena Retail Group, Inc.192019 Proxy Statement


whether of a civil, criminal, administrative, regulatory, legislative or investigative nature, relating to any occurrence or event before or after the date of the Indemnification Agreements, by reason of the fact that such individuals are or were our directors or officers, subject to certain exclusions and procedures set forth in the Indemnification Agreements.

Do you

Does the Company have a written Code of Ethics?

Yes, our “Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers” is posted on the “for investors”“investors” page of the Company’s website at www.ascenaretail.com, accessible through the “Investor Relations Menu.”“Corporate Governance” tab. This code of ethics complies with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 pertaining to codes of ethics for chief executives and senior financial and accounting officers. If we amend or waive a provision of our “Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers” that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, we will post such information at this location on our website. A copy of the code of ethics will be provided to any stockholder upon request.

Do you

Does the Company have a Whistleblower Policy?

Yes, as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we have established a confidential hotline for employees to call with any information regarding concerns about accounting or auditing matters. All calls are referred to the Chair of the Audit Committee. Our “Whistleblower Policy” is posted on the “for investors”“investors” page of the Company’s website at www.ascenaretail.com, accessible through the “Investor Relations Menu.”

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.202017 Proxy Statement
“Corporate Governance” tab.


FISCAL 2017 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

How can I communicate with members of the Board?

You may contact any member of the Board by writing to our Board at:

Ascena’s Board of Directors

c/o Chair of the Audit Committee

Ascena Retail Group, Inc.

933 MacArthur Boulevard

Mahwah, New Jersey 07430

To the extent reasonably practical under the circumstances, all such communications are treated confidentially and you can remain anonymous when communicating your concerns.

When does yourthe Company’s fiscal year end?

Historically, our fiscal years have ended on the last Saturday in July. However, commencing with ourin June 2018, the Board approved a change in the Company’s fiscal 2018 year (i.e., the fiscal year commencing on July 30, 2017), such fiscal year will end onto August 4, 2018, when the Company conforms its fiscal period endand for each year thereafter, to the calendar of the National Retail Federation.Saturday closest to July 31. References in this proxy statement to a “fiscal year” are to the calendar year in which the fiscal year ends. For example, the fiscal year ended July 29, 2017August 3, 2019 is referred to as “fiscal 2017”2019” and the fiscal year ended August 4, 20181, 2020 is referred to as “fiscal 2018.2020.




LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.202120172019 Proxy Statement



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OVERVIEW


Executive Summary

23

 24 

 25 

 26 

 26 

 27 

 28 

 28 

 28 

Establishing the Compensation for the CEO

29 

 30 

 30 

 32 

 33 

 34 

 36 

 36 

 36 

 37 

 37 

 38 

 38 

 39 

Summary Compensation Tables

Ascena Retail Group, Inc.
21402019 Proxy Statement


This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the compensation philosophy, objectives, policies and practices with respect to our named executive officers (the “NEOs”). The NEOs for fiscal 20172019 are comprised of our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, andthe three other most highly compensated officers forserving at the end of fiscal year 20172019, in addition to two former executive officers based upon their pre-separation compensation, are as follows:

Gary Muto,
CEO
Carrie W. Teffner,
Interim Executive Chair of the Board
Dan Lamadrid,
EVP and CFO
Wendy Hufford,
SVP, General Counsel and Secretary
David Jaffe,
Former Chairman and CEO
Robb Giammatteo,
Former EVP and CFO
Brian Lynch,
Former President and
Chief Operating Officer


David Jaffe,

Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)

Robb Giammatteo,

EVP and

Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”)

Brian Lynch,

President and

Chief Operating Officer (“COO”)

John Pershing,

EVP and

Chief Human Resources Officer (“CHRO”)

Duane D. Holloway,

EVP, General Counsel and

Assistant Secretary

On August 1, 2017 and effective for fiscal 2018, the Company announced changes to its leadership structure which included the expansion of the role of Brian Lynch as the Company’s President and COO, and the promotion of Gary Muto to a newly created role of President and Chief Executive Officer of ascena Brands. In connection with these changes, David Jaffe continued in his role as the Company’s Chairman and CEO, but is no longer serving as President.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.2220172019 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Fiscal 2017 Company Performance


Financial Results and Transformation Initiatives

Fiscal 2017 represented another challenging yearPortfolio Realignment

Our financial results for fiscal 2019 fell short of our expectations, and we struggled to efficiently respond to broader headwinds in the retail industry. We, along with manySpecific factors impacting our fiscal 2019 enterprise operational results included increased competition and pricing pressure, our product portfolio that failed to reflect evolving consumer tastes and preferences across all of our peers, were impacted by continuingbrands, and the relatively high levelsoverhead costs embedded in our multi-brand portfolio strategy. We, as a team, understand the imperative of competition as well as lower store traffic. Key operatingreturning to profitability, and we take seriously our commitments to our customers, vendors, and shareholders.
The disappointing enterprise-level results in fiscal 2017 included:

2019 culminated in a review of our segment and brand portfolio and overall enterprise structure. During the second half of fiscal 2018 and the first half of fiscal 2019, we identified our Value segment as being particularly vulnerable to secular trends towards multi-channel retail platforms and evolving consumer tastes. As a result, we made the decision in the second half of fiscal 2019 to sell the maurices brand to an affiliate of OpCapita LLP and use the proceeds to pay down existing loan balances and/or to reinvest in our other brands that we view as having greater potential in the current retail environment. In addition to cash proceeds, we received an approximately 49.6% interest in the OpCapita LLP affiliate that is now the owner of maurices. Following the sale of maurices, we also made the difficult decision to wind-down the operations of dressbarn, which was the first brand of ascena and which was started by our Founder, Roslyn Jaffe, in 1962. The decisions to sell maurices and wind-down dressbarn’s operations were difficult and effectively removed us from the value fashion market; that said, we believe that each decision streamlines our operations, allows for further investment of financial and human capital in higher growth opportunities, and better positions us to deliver long-term value to our shareholders.
NetDespite our disappointing and unacceptable enterprise-level results in fiscal 2019, we believe that our remaining brand portfolio contains positive growth opportunities for us to leverage in fiscal 2020. In particular, our Premium Fashion segment continues to perform well and achieved positive comparable sales decreasedyear-over-year, and Justice remains the number one specialty player in girls’ apparel. Our transformation initiatives are leading to a stronger product that resonates with our customers by 5%;providing assortment versatility. One strong example of this is our Premium segment at Ann Taylor, where we are shifting the perception toward more wearing occasions relevant to our customers’ daily life. We are optimistic that this shift in the merchandising strategy for Ann Taylor and

Operating loss was $1.3 billion compared LOFT will translate into winning strategies across our portfolio. Our remaining brands-Justice in the Kids Fashion segment and Lane Bryant and Catherines in the Plus Fashion segment-had mixed results across fiscal 2019 and are seen as key growth platforms to operating income of $93.8 millionlift our enterprise-level results for fiscal 2016, with the loss primarily due2020. Our successes across these three brands hinge on our ability to the impairment of goodwillexecute on our three key priorities: (i) driving sustainable growth, (ii) improving operating margins, and other intangible assets.(iii) optimizing our capital structure.

Despite these challenges during the year, we believe we made great strides in setting the stage

We will also look towards fiscal 2020 as an opportunity to continue right-sizing our brand support staff and identifying areas for future success through the launch in October 2016cost savings. As an output of our “Change for Growth” initiative,portfolio realignment, we have re-focused our efforts on creating a transformation program with the objectivemore nimble organization and optimizing our existing human capital across our brands. Initiatives focused on reducing our structural costs are expected to contribute an additional $150 million in cumulative realized savings, most of supporting sustainable long-term growthwhich will be realized in fiscal 2020. This focus on nimbleness and increasing stockholder value.efficiency better positions us to deliver on our commitments to our customers, vendors, and shareholders.
New Leadership Team
The Company implemented several significant leadership transitions during fiscal 2019. In connection with the program, we:

aforementioned portfolio realignment, David Jaffe retired as Chairman and CEO from those positions on May 1, 2019 and Gary Muto was elevated to the role of CEO and appointed to the Board of Directors. Mr. Muto had previously served as President and CEO-ascena Brands since August 2017.
RefinedGiven the challenging and rapidly evolving retail market, we also appointed Carrie W. Teffner as Interim Executive Chair of the Board on May 1, 2019. In her role as Interim Executive Chair of the Board, Ms. Teffner works as a thought partner with Mr. Muto in formulating the Company’s go-forward strategy and stabilizing business operations.
Among other factors, the appointments of Mr. Muto and Ms. Teffner make our operating model by creatingleadership structure more efficient and optimize brand leadership and integration under our “one ascena” philosophy, which we believe will be a core driver in stabilizing our business. The appointments of Mr. Muto and Ms. Teffner are described in more detail in the Premium Fashion, Value Fashion, Plus Fashionsection titled “Year of Significant Transition in Company Leadership.”
Additionally, Brian Lynch, our former President and Kids Fashion operating segmentsChief Operating Officer, and streamliningJohn Pershing, our executive organization structure;

Further consolidated certain support functions into our ascena brand services group;

Began outsourcing certain transaction processing functions to an independent third-party managed service provider; and

Conducted a review of our stores in an effort to optimize our fleet and increaseformer Chief Human Resources Officer, departed the overall profitability of our locations.

From these activities, we realized savings of approximately $65 millionCompany during fiscal 2017 and expect to realize a total2019. Robb Giammatteo, our former CFO, departed the Company at the conclusion of$250-$300 million fiscal 2019. These departures are described in cost savings through fiscal 2020.

Also during fiscal 2017, we spent approximately $258 million in capital expenditures, which included both routine spending in connection with ongoing investments in our retail store network, construction and renovation of our existing fleet of retail stores as well as spending fornon-routine capital investments to enhance our technology and supply chain infrastructure (including our distribution and fulfillment centers).

In fiscal 2017, we continued to invest in initiatives that support our omni-channel strategies. We completed the transition of all brands onto our new ecommerce/omni-channel platform. Additionally, the Company’s new distribution center in Riverside, California commenced West Coastbrick-and-mortar distributions this past spring. The Company’s distribution centers in Etna, Ohio and Riverside, California, and its fulfillment center in Greencastle, Indiana, are expected to enhance our fulfillment capability and distribution efficiency.

We believe that ongoing challengesmore detail in the retail industry environment underscore the importance for thesection titled “Year of Significant Transition in Company to continue to execute against these strategic initiatives, and our executive team is committedLeadership.”

Dan Lamadrid was elevated to the ongoing successrole of CFO, effective on the first day of fiscal 2020. Mr. Lamadrid had previously served as Chief Accounting Officer. Additionally, Wendy Hufford was appointed as SVP and General Counsel in October 2018.

Ascena Retail Group, Inc.232019 Proxy Statement


Below we provide a timeline of leadership transitions and significant events for our business transformation.

during 2019:

asnatimelinejpeg.jpg
Key Fiscal 20172019 Executive Compensation Outcomes

We believe the executive compensation-related decisions made duringfor fiscal 2019, and the year and theassociated outcomes of our programs, highlight our ongoing focus on drivingpay-for-performance and aligning our executives’ interests and pay opportunities with those of our stockholders, and are reflective of the challenging year we experienced.stockholders. In fiscal 2017:

2019:
Our former CEO, CFO, and CHROMr. Jaffe, did not receive increasesa seasonal cash incentive payout for either the fall or spring 2019 season due to their base salaries. Increases were provided to our General Counsel and COO in recognition of increased responsibility through the year and to maintain alignment with our compensation philosophy;

As a result ofConsolidated ascena Enterprise Operating Income performancefalling below our threshold goals;

We achieved segment/brand Operating Income results between threshold and target goals for the fall 2019 season that resulted in a fall season IC payout at 31.0% of target for our other then-serving NEOs (other than Ms. Hufford);

We did not achieve threshold levels established byOperating Income goals for the spring season, and as such, our NEOs (other than Ms. Hufford) did not receive a spring season IC payout;

Ms. Hufford received an IC payout at 100% of target for both the fiscal 2019 fall and spring seasons in accordance with her offer letter;
The Compensation Committee noneagain discounted the target value of annual long-term incentive awards to each of the NEOs (other than Ms. Hufford) by 30% (as was the practice in fiscal 2018) to better align pay opportunities with recent Company performance and to conserve shares. As such, these NEOs, including our CEO, were granted only 70% of their typical long-term incentive award target. Ms. Hufford received a “steady state” long-term incentive award with no discount in accordance with her offer letter;
Annual long-term incentive ("LTI") opportunities in fiscal 2019 were granted in the form of:
Performance-based cash long-term incentive plan ("LTIP") awards that vest after 3 years based on our Comparable Sales and Adjusted EBITDA performance with a modifier for TSR performance relative to a select group of peers (60% of “steady-state” target weighting; 86% of actual awards for fiscal 2019). LTIP awards are intended to encourage growth to fund our business and increase stockholder returns; and
Time-vesting stock options that vest over a 2-year period (20% of “steady-state” weighting; 14% of actual annual awards to all NEOs in fiscal 2019). Stock options are intended to encourage a long-term focus on value creation given their 7-year exercise term.
Similar to last year, in conjunction with the 30% reduction in long-term incentive opportunities for the NEOs (other than Ms. Hufford), time-based RSUs were not granted to any of our NEOs received payouts under our seasonal incentive compensation program;

In recognition of their substantial effort and leadership through(other than Ms. Hufford) during the year and the importance of retention and motivation with respectannual grant cycle to achieving our Change for Growth initiatives, the Compensation Committee approved fiscal 2017 discretionary bonus payouts for our CFO, CHRO, and General Counsel (but excluding our CEO and President and COO), which equaled 27% of their respective annual bonus target opportunity;further

The Compensation Committee applied negative discretion to formulaically calculated payouts under our performance-based long-term incentive program, resulting in zero value being distributed for the vesting of these units;

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.242320172019 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

NEOs were granted
the link between long-term incentivepay opportunities in fiscal 2017 in the form of:

Performance-based LTIP which will vest after 3 years based on our Net Income and relative Total Stockholder Return performance (60% weighted)

Time-vesting stock options which vest over a3-year period (20% weighted)

Time-vestingstockholder value creation (time-based RSUs which vest over a3-year period (20% weighted)

To increase the alignment of our executives with the goalsotherwise represent 20% of the Change for Growth program, a “transformation bonus” opportunity was introduced for our NEOs (excluding“steady-state” weighting); and
In October 2019, the CEO) which provides long-term compensation opportunity if our cost reduction targets are achieved through fiscal 2021.Compensation Committee terminated the Company’s Transformation Bonus Program and all outstanding awards under the Transformation Bonus Program. Additional information about the Transformation Bonus Program and the decision to terminate it is provided below under the heading “Transformation Bonus Opportunity”.



COMPENSATION PROGRAM OBJECTIVES AND PHILOSOPHY

The overall objective of


We design our executive compensation program is to attract and retain highly skilled, performance-oriented executives andexecutives. In doing so, we structure incentives to motivate them to achieve outstanding results through appropriate incentives. We focus on thestrong financial performance and align with stockholder interests. The following core principles in structuring an effective compensation program that meetsguide the achievement of our stated objectives:

PRINCIPLE

IMPACT

Provide market-competitive opportunities to attract and retain key talent

P    Provide our organization with the necessary tools to attract and retain the best talent by offering    Offer total compensation opportunities that isare competitive with thatthose offered by similarly-situated companies with which we compete for executive talent

   We targettalent. In practice, this results in salary compensation for our senior management positions for the Company and our brands at approximately the 62nd percentilebeing positioned within a competitive range of the national retail market to allow us to aggressively court and retain talent

compensation peer group median 

Encourage and reward performance at the individual, brand, and corporate levels

P    Balance     Balances all aspects of an executive’s responsibilities: base salary forday-to-day responsibilities; seasonal cash incentive bonusbonuses for shorter-term returns linked to semi-annual Companyannual financial performance; and long-term cash and/or equity incentive awards for aligning theto align executives’ focus with stockholder value creation and the long-term, future performance of the Company

P    Ensure     For fiscal 2019, this resulted in compensation delivered in three primary forms: base salary, seasonal cash IC bonuses, and LTIP awards and equity incentives. The mix of vehicles is intended to ensure that a significant portion of the total compensation opportunities for our executives isare “at risk” based on Company and individual performance

Align executives’ interests with those of stockholders

P    Provide stock-related components that are dependent on    Explicitly ties a portion of long-term incentives to the performance of our stock price over a period of several years

P    Provide performance-based long-term incentives that promote    Encourages retention and a longer-term performance focus

though vehicles that carry multi-year performance periods and service-based vesting requirements

With respect to the total direct compensation paid to our NEOs, the Compensation Committee, with the recommendations and advice of its independent compensation consultant, Radford, utilizes and reviews data from peer companies and survey data provided by Equilar for the purposes of benchmarkinganalyzing the pay positioning of key positionsroles within the organization, prepared by Hay Group, Mercer and Equilar. Although we consider industry-basedorganization. Industry-based compensation studies and data in order to obtain ainform our general understanding of current compensation practices a substantial partand serve as one input into our compensation decision-making process. Additional points of reference for the Compensation Committee’s workCommittee include a role’s scope of responsibilities, the criticality of an individual to the organization, and compensation decisions have been based on internal discussionsan individual’s potential to influence and conclusions regarding what compensation levels would produce a competitive compensation package while also providing the requisite performance incentives to drive Company financial and strategic performance.

future business results.


LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.252420172019 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


KEY FEATURES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

The Compensation Committee reviews on an ongoing basis our executive compensation and benefits programs on an ongoing basis to evaluate whether these programs support the Company’s compensation philosophy and objectives and serve the interests of our stockholders. The Company’s practices include the following, each of which the Compensation Committee believes reinforces our executive compensation philosophy and objectives:


What We Do:

 P   Linkage Between Performance Measures and Long-Term Growth — Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain talent with an emphasis on pay-for-performance and creatinglong-term value through sustainable net income growth (resulting in increased stockholder returns). growth.

P  Performance-Based Long-Term Incentive Awards — Performance-based long-term cash LTIP awards represent 60% of the Company’s annual LTI mix for the NEOs on a “steady-state” basis (and represented 86% of the LTI mix for NEOs other than Ms. Hufford in fiscal 2019). For the three-year period beginning in fiscal 2017, metrics for performance-based long-term incentive (“LTIP”) awards2019, cash LTIP award payouts are tied to net income (50%Comparable Sales (25%) and total shareholder return (“TSR”Adjusted EBITDA (75%) with a modifier based on TSR performance relative to a select indexgroup of retailers (50%). These actions are intended to further align senior management compensation with stockholder returns.

peers.

 P   Market Comparison of Executive Compensation Against a Relevant Peer Group — The Compensation Committee annually reviews benchmarkingcompetitive market data provided by consulting partnersits independent compensation consultant and Company management.

 P   “Double Trigger” Vesting in the Event of a Change in Control Severance — In the event of a change in control, cash severance benefits are predominantly payable or vest upon a “double trigger” for our executive officers (i.e., upon an involuntary termination that occurs 90 days prior to or within 2 years following a change in control), and there are no “walk rights” following a change in control (i.e., the ability for executives to receive change in control-related payments without the loss of their job or substantial diminution of job duties).

 P   Independent Compensation Consultant — The Compensation Committee retains its own compensation consultant to review and advise on the Company’s executive compensation program and practices.

 P   Maximum Payout Caps for Executive Officer Incentive Compensation Programs — Payouts under our short-term IC and long-term incentive compensation vehiclescash LTIP programs are capped at 200% of target.

 P   Share   Stock Ownership Guidelines — Our Chief Executive OfficerCEO is required to hold 6x his base salary, and our other executive officers and brand presidents are required to hold 1x their base salaries, each to be achieved within five years of the adoption of the guidelines or, if later, promotion or hire.

 P   Hedging/Pledging Policy — None of ourOur executive officers ornon-employee directors are permitted to engageprohibited from engaging in hedging or pledging transactions with respect to our stock.

What We Don’t Do:

 x   No Guaranteed Salary Increases or Guaranteed Bonuses

 x  No Change in Control or Perquisite TaxGross-Ups

 x   No Employment Agreements (except with our CEO, which agreement terminated in August 2017)

 x   No Significant Executive Perquisites

 x   No Excessive Severance Benefits

 x   No Service-Based Defined Benefit Pension Plan or Other Similar Benefits

 x   No Repricing of Underwater Stock Options Without Stockholder Approval

 x   No Executive Officer is Entitled to Termination Bonus in Excess of Market Standard



LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.262520172019 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


KEY ELEMENTS OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM


Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain quality leaders with an emphasis on pay-for-performance and creatinglong-term sustainable and profitable growth.long-term stockholder returns. Our compensation program includes significant performance-based elements and is designedwhich are intended to ensure that our NEOs have a significant portion of their total compensation “at risk” based on Company performance. We believe this feature createscreate a meaningful incentive for outstanding performance and serves as an effective retention tool. OurFor fiscal 2019, our annual executive compensation program generally consistsconsisted of the following elements:

Element

Purpose

Element

Purpose
Base salary

Provide a fixed component of pay that is aligned with our compensation philosophy and intended to attract and retain executives with the necessary skills and experience to execute on our strategic priorities.

Semi-annualSeasonal cash incentive bonuses

Provide a bonus opportunity linked to our seasonal Operating Income performance to drive executives’ focus on our ongoing financial success.

Stock options and restricted stock units

Equity awardsCreate an ownership culture among employees, provide an incentive to contribute to the continued growth and development of our business and align the interests of executives with stockholders over a long-term period.

Cash LTIP (Long-Term Incentive Plan)

AwardsFocus our executives on the long-term goals and strategic initiatives of the organization and align the interests of executives with stockholders over a long-term period.



FISCAL 20172019 PAY MIX & PERFORMANCE FOCUS


The following features of our compensation program for executive officers underscore our performance-based compensation philosophy:

P100% of annual incentive compensation (“IC”) under ourOur fiscal 20172019 Annual Cash Incentive Plan was tied entirely to performance againstpre-established, specific, measurable operating income seasonal Operating Income (“OI”) goals.

P60%86% of the actual fiscal 20172019 annual long-term incentive grant wasgrants to each of our NEOs (other than Ms. Hufford and Ms. Teffner) were in the form of a three-year performancecash LTIP award with payout contingent on achievingpre-established net income Comparable Sales and Adjusted EBITDA goals with a relative total stockholder return goals.TSR overall payout modifier.

POur time-based restricted stock units and nonqualifiedNonqualified stock option awards together comprise 40%comprised 14% of the annual LTI grants to our NEOs (other than Ms. Hufford and Ms. Teffner) in fiscal 2017 LTI grant,2019. NEOs only “realize” value from stock options to the realizable value of which are tied toextent that our share price increases above the exercise price.

PApproximately 89%88% of our CEO’s total target compensation for Mr. Muto, our CEO, was tied to the achievement of corporate performance objectives and share price performance.

PWe did not grant time-based RSUs to our NEOs (other than Ms. Hufford) as part of our ongoing pay program in fiscal 2019.

We allocate compensation betweenshort-term andlong-term components and between cash and equity in order to maximize executive performance and retention.Long-term cash compensation and equity awards comprise an increasingly larger proportionpercentage of overall total compensation opportunities for our executives as position level increaseslevels increase based on our belief that these elements of compensation more closely align management’stheir interests with our financial performance and with our stockholders’ interests.



LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.272620172019 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


For fiscal year 2017,2019, the targeted mix of base salary, annual cash incentive bonuses, and long-term incentives for our Chairman and CEO and other NEOs as a group (on average)employed at the end of fiscal 2019 was:

LOGO

LOGO

 

ceopaymixa02.jpginterimchairpaymixa01.jpgcfogcpaymixa03.jpg

Other NEOs
OPPORTUNITY FOR STOCKHOLDER FEEDBACK

On an annual basis

Each year, the compensation of our NEOs, as disclosed in our annual proxy statement, is submitted to our stockholders for anon-binding advisory vote (commonly known as a“say-on-pay” “say-on-pay” proposal). In response to a significant decline in stockholder support for oursay-on-pay vote at our 2015 annual meeting, we initiated significant stockholder outreach in order to obtain input from our stockholders regarding the Company’s executive compensation program. During fiscal 2016, we reached outprogram and as a result, made several changes to stockholders representing approximately 56 million shares or nearly 29% of our outstanding shares (consisting of our 11 largest stockholders that voted against our fiscal 2015 executive compensation program)programs. We continue to request meetings to discussconsider stockholder input when making decisions regarding our executive compensation practices and any other topics of interest.programs. In connection with our outreach efforts, we received positive responses from, and heldone-on-one conversations with stockholders representing approximately 42 million shares or approximately 55% of our outstanding shares, including our six largest stockholders that voted against our fiscal 2015 executive compensation program. The purpose of these discussions, which included meetings between these stockholders, our CFO and our Lead Independent Director (who is also a membereach of the Compensation Committee), was to gain insight and perspective onlast three years, our executive compensation programs and policies as disclosed in our proxy statement for our 2015 Annual Meeting.

During these discussions, the Company shared actions that were being taken by our Compensation Committee in response to stockholders concerns, as well as additional compensation practices that the Company had recently adopted. Each of those actions, described below, including those we implementedsay-on-pay proposal has received above 90% support.

We value a strong dialogue with respect to fiscal 2017 was well received by the investors. Overall, we had meaningful discussions and received valuable feedback, as well as appreciation of our outreach efforts, and acknowledgment of our responsiveness. As a result of the changes made to our compensation practices and stockholder engagement, our 2016say-on-pay proposal was overwhelmingly supported by stockholders with a favorable vote of over 98% of votes cast. The Compensation Committee considered the result of this advisory vote to be an endorsement of our fiscal 2016 compensation program, policies, practices and philosophy for our NEOs. Our Compensation Committee will continue to consider the outcome of oursay-on-pay votes and our stockholder views when making compensation decisions for our NEOs.

Changes We Made in Response to Stockholder Feedback
  ✓Expanded Disclosure of Performance Metrics in Proxy Statement
  ✓Included TSR metric in our LTIP Awards
  ✓Adopted a Clawback Policy for Section 16 Officers
  ✓Expanded Stock Ownership Guidelines to Cover all Company Leadership
  ✓Committed to Ongoing Stockholder Outreach & Engagement

We believe we have addressed many of the topics raised by our stockholders and will continuediscuss pay-related topics from time-to-time in order to solicit stockholder feedback to assist in ongoing evaluations of our compensation and governance practices. The Compensation Committee carefully considers feedback from our stockholders regarding

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.272017 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

executive compensation matters.during the program design process. Stockholders are invited to express their views or concerns directly to the Compensation Committee or the Board in the manner described above under “How can I communicate with members of the BoardBoard”.



FREQUENCY OFSAY-ON-PAY VOTE


Consistent with the preference expressed by our stockholders at the 20112017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in our frequency ofsay-on-pay vote, we currently hold oursay-on-pay vote on an annual basis. Our frequency ofsay-on-pay vote will take place for our stockholders at this year’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Our Board recommends that our stockholders vote that frequency ofsay-on-pay votes be held every year. See Proposal Four — Frequency of Ascena’sSay-On-Pay Votes on page 63.


Ascena Retail Group, Inc.282019 Proxy Statement


DETERMINATION OF COMPENSATION


When reviewing and evaluating our executive compensation for fiscal year 2017,2019, we relied on the significant prior experience of our Compensation Committee in establishing compensation programs and levels across many companies in multiple industries, the input of our former Chairman and CEO (except with regard to his own compensation) and the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant retained solely by the Compensation Committee.consultant. The following is an overview of the roles of the various participants in our executive compensation process:

PARTICIPANTSROLE IN THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROCESS

Compensation
Committee

  Our Compensation Committee reviews and approves salaries and other compensation of all senior executives of the Company (including the NEOs).

  Our Compensation Committee also administers the Omnibus Incentive Plan, and establishes and reviews the achievement of performance goals and other matters relating to the Company’s annual,semi-annual andlong-term bonus and incentive plans for senior executives (including the NEOs).

Executive Officers

    Mr. David Jaffe, our Chairman and  Our CEO annually reviews the performance of each NEO with the Compensation Committee and makes recommendations with respect to each key element of executive compensation for each NEO (excluding himself), as well as other senior executives at the Company.

Mr. Jaffe was our Chairman and CEO at the start of fiscal 2019 and was responsible for making these recommendations for fiscal 2019.

  The Chief Financial OfficerCFO and Chief Human Resources OfficerHR leadership also prepare and submit information during the course of the year for the consideration of the Compensation Committee, including information relevant to annual,semi-annual andlong-term performance measures, proposed financial targets, proposed recommendations for salary increases and proposed equity award allocations.

Bonus Review
Committee

  The Company and brandSegment/ Brand financial goals under the Omnibus Incentive Plan (which was amended in December 2015 to incorporate the Amended and Restated Executive 162(m) Bonus Plan) are developed by the applicable Bonus Review Committee, which then presents the goals to the Compensation Committee for review and approval.

  For the fiscal 2017, our Chairman2019 fall season, Messrs. Jaffe, Giammatteo, and CEO, our CFO, and our CHRO,Pershing served as the Bonus Review Committee.

For the fiscal 2019 spring season, Messrs. Muto and Lamadrid and Ms. Teffner served as the Bonus Review Committee.

Compensation
Consultants

    The  In fiscal 2018, following an extensive search process, the Compensation Committee engages anselected and engaged SBCG as its independent compensation consultant, Radford,consultant. SBCG continued to provide advice regarding our executive compensation program.

    For more information aboutserve the Compensation Committee’s engagement of Radford, please see the section above entitled “Questions and Answers About our Board and Corporate Governance Matters — What are the Functions of the Standing Committees — Compensation Committee.

Committee in fiscal 2019.



PEER GROUP


Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews and confirms the appropriateness of our peer group. The purpose of thecompensation peer group isin light of any changes to benchmarkthe Company’s size, business direction or strategic vision. The peer group generally serves as the primary reference in reviewing competitive pay practices and review all forms of total direct compensation levels for our NEOs. Our guiding principles for selecting and evaluating peer groups include:

The peer group should predominantly be comprised of multi-divisional apparel retailreflects our status as a multi-brand retailer and includes companies with annual revenues generally betweenone-half and two times those of the Company,Company’s.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.282017 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The peer group serves as a reference point when making pay decisions and evaluating performance, particularly for the CEO and the CFO, and

The peer group should be examined annually to test its validity and appropriateness given any changes to the company’s size, business direction, or strategic vision.

The Company uses the proxy peer group for:

Executive compensation benchmarking,market reviews, particularly for our CEO and CFO;

Director compensation benchmarking,benchmarking; and

Incentive design review and consideration of governance factors relative to the marketmarket.

The following companies served as our peer group when on-cycle pay decisions were made for fiscal 2017:

2019:

Fiscal 2019 Peer Group
Abercrombie & FitchJC Penney
American Eagle OutfittersL Brands
Bed Bath & BeyondRoss Stores
Burlington Coat FactorySignet Jewelers
Dick’s Sporting GoodsTailored Brands
Foot LockerUrban Outfitters
GapWilliams-Sonoma

  2017 PeerAscena Retail Group,

 Abercrombie & Fitch

Inc.
29

JC Penney

 American Eagle Outfitters

L Brands

 Bed Bath & Beyond

Ross Stores

 Burlington Coat Factory

Signet Jewelers

 Dick’s Sporting Goods

Tailored Brands

 Foot Locker

Urban Outfitters

 Gap

Williams-Sonoma

2019 Proxy Statement

This peer group is consistent with



In addition to the group used in fiscal 2016. Following a review of the group in early fiscal 2018, the Committee approved that no changes to this group be made for the fiscal 2018 peer group.

ESTABLISHING THE COMPENSATION FOR THE CEO

The Compensation Committee sets the compensation of our CEO based on the objectives, philosophy and methodology described throughout this document. Each year,companies listed above, the Compensation Committee makesalso considered pay levels at several other retailers when establishing Mr. Muto’s pay as CEO. The additional companies listed below were also referenced as relevant data points given their retail focus, multi-brand/ mall-based emphasis, and their relevant size following our sale of maurices and wind-down of dressbarn.


Additional Companies Considered When Establishing Mr. Muto’s Pay as CEO
Carter’slululemon athletica
Chico’s FASPVH
ExpressRalph Lauren
Guess?Tapestry
Levi Strauss

The companies referenced when establishing Mr. Muto’s pay upon promotion were also used in establishing Ms. Teffner’s target pay for her role as Interim Executive Chair of the Board. In particular, the ratios of target pay between CEOs and other named executive officers at the companies listed above were used as a determination on CEO compensationguiding post in consideration of:

Overall Company performance duringestablishing Interim Executive Chair of the year,Board pay.

Mr. Jaffe’s performance during the year and ongoing contributionsFollowing significant changes to the Company’s success,portfolio of brands and

Competitive pay levels within the Company’s reduced size, the Compensation Committee is in the process of reviewing the peer group.

Forgroup for fiscal 2017,2020.



YEAR OF SIGNIFICANT TRANSITION IN COMPANY LEADERSHIP

The Company experienced several significant leadership transitions during fiscal 2019 and in connection with the aforementioned portfolio realignment. David Jaffe retired as Chairman and CEO on May 1, 2019 and Gary Muto was elevated to the role of CEO and appointed to the Board of Directors. Mr. Muto had previously served as President and CEO-ascena Brands since August 2017.
Given the challenging and rapidly evolving retail market, we also appointed Carrie W. Teffner as Interim Executive Chair of the Board on May 1, 2019. The Interim Executive Chair of the Board works as a thought partner with the CEO in formulating the company’s go-forward strategy and stabilizing business operations.
Among other factors, the appointments of Mr. Muto and Ms. Teffner make our leadership structure more efficient and optimize brand leadership and integration under our “one ascena” philosophy, which we believe will be a core driver in stabilizing our business.

Ascena Retail Group, Inc.302019 Proxy Statement


Below we provide a timeline of leadership transitions and significant events for our business during 2019:
asnatimelinejpega01.jpg
Mr. Jaffe served as our Chairman and CEO from 2002 until his retirement from those positions on May 1, 2019. Mr. Jaffe’s compensation opportunitypay as CEO was designedestablished at the beginning of fiscal 2019, similar to be aligned with our compensation philosophy, with significant weightingother NEOs that were employed on “at risk” compensation elements. The compensation he realized during the year was reflectivefirst day of the challenges the Company faced and is aligned with our strongpay-for-performance focus.fiscal year. Key elements of his fiscal 20172019 compensation include:

Base salary was maintained at $1,000,000 (which is positioned near the 25th percentile of the peer benchmarking references); Mr. Jaffe’s base salary had not been not increased since fiscal 2013 and was positioned near the 25th percentile of our peer group;
Base salary was maintained at $1,000,000; he has not receivedMr. Jaffe’s target seasonal bonus opportunities as a basepercentage of salary increase since fiscal 2013,

No increases were made to targeted incentive compensation values,

Mr. Jaffe did not receive any payouts from ourchange in fiscal 2019. Consolidated ascena Enterprise Operating Income achievement below threshold for the fall and spring seasons resulted in no annual incentive compensation program("IC") payout for Mr. Jaffe in fiscal 2017 nor2019. Further, he did henot realize any value from the vesting of performance-based long-term cash incentives

The majority (60%) of Mr. Jaffe’s fiscal 2017 long-term incentive opportunity was a multi-year, performance-based as the FY19 cash LTIP award tied to net incomethreshold goals were not achieved; and total shareholder return goals, and

Mr. Jaffe also is not eligible to participate in the Transformation Bonus opportunity introduced during fiscal 2017 for our other NEOs (as further described below).

As with our other NEOs that received an annual long-term incentive grant (other than Ms. Hufford), Mr. Jaffe’s long-term incentive opportunity was reduced by 30%. As a result, 86% of Mr. Jaffe’s fiscal 2019 long-term incentive opportunity was a multi-year, performance-based award tied to Comparable Sales and Adjusted EBITDA with a payout modifier for relative TSR, and his target pay opportunity was positioned below the 25th percentile of our peers.
Following Mr. Jaffe’s retirement as Chairman and CEO on May 1, 2019, Mr. Jaffe remained an employee of the Company to serve as a senior advisor through June 28, 2019, at which time Mr. Jaffe retired as an employee. While serving as a senior advisor, Mr. Jaffe was paid a salary at an annualized rate of $250,000.
In connection with Mr. Jaffe’s retirement as CEO, the Company appointed Gary Muto as the Company’s CEO and a member of the Board, effective May 1, 2019. Mr. Muto’s offer letter provides the following compensatory terms:::
Mr. Muto's base salary remained $1,000,000 for fiscal 2019 and his target opportunity under the Company's IC program was increased to 150% of base salary for the remainder of fiscal 2019, up from his previous target of 125%;
Mr. Muto’s annual LTI opportunity for fiscal 2019 was unchanged; and his LTI opportunity for fiscal 2020 will be established as discussed in the “Key NEO Compensation Program Changes for Fiscal 2020” section;
In addition, Mr. Muto received a one-time long-term incentive award of performance-based equity (the “Promotion Grant”) in order to align his incentive opportunity directly with the value realized by our stockholders. The Promotion Grant had a target grant date value of $3,850,000, with approximately 60% of the value granted in the form of performance-based RSUs and 40% in the form of

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.312920172019 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


performance-based stock options. Both vehicles are tied to the achievement of $3, $5, and $7 stock price hurdles. The Promotion Grant is discussed in further detail in the “Long-Term Incentive Award Section”.
Given the appointment of Mr. Muto as CEO during a time of significant change in our business and a challenging and competitive retail environment, the Company also appointed Carrie W. Teffner as Interim Executive Chair of the Board, effective May 1, 2019. In her new role, Ms. Teffner will work with Mr. Muto in guiding the Company to achieve our operational milestones and deliver value to our stockholders. Ms. Teffner’s offer letter provides the following compensatory terms:
Ms. Teffner will receive a base salary of $1,000,000 for fiscal 2019 and a target opportunity under the Company’s IC program of 150% of base salary. Ms. Teffner’s fiscal 2019 IC payout was pro-rated for her partial year of service as an employee;
In addition, Ms. Teffner received a one-time long-term incentive award of performance-based equity (the "Appointment Grant") that had a grant date value of $1,050,000, with approximately 60% of the value granted in the form of performance-based RSUs and 40% in the form of performance-based stock options. The Appointment Grant will vest in accordance with the same vesting schedule that applies to Mr. Muto's Promotion Grant. Similar to our CEO, the Appointment Grant is intended to align Ms. Teffner's incentive opportunity directly with the value realized by our stockholders. The Appointment Grant is discussed in further detail in the ”Long-Term Incentive Award Section”.
The changes to the Company leadership structure, and the accompanying pay actions, are aimed to lead our Company’s turnaround and ensure that our full executive team’s interests and incentive opportunities are aligned with our stockholders’ interests.


00BASE SALARY


The base salaries of our NEOs are an important element of their total compensation packages, and are intended to reflect their respective positions, duties and responsibilities. Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews NEO salaries and, if appropriate, approves merit-based increases if appropriate, based on a number of factors including:

The market competitiveness of salaries,salaries;

The individual performance and potential of each NEONEO; and

The overall performance of the organization.

The table below summarizes the annualCompensation Committee determined not to adjust Mr. Muto’s base salary rates of our NEOsin connection with his appointment as CEO in May 2019. Mr. Muto’s base salary at the end of fiscal years 20162019 remained $1,000,000, which is positioned near the 25th percentile of the peer benchmarking references. The base salaries of Ms. Teffner ($1,000,000) and 2017. Only Messrs. Lynch and Holloway received compensation increasesMs. Hufford ($400,000) were established in connection with their commencement of employment with us in fiscal 20172019. The Compensation Committee did not make any adjustments to Mr. Lamadrid’s base salary for fiscal 2019, which remained $425,000. In connection with Mr. Lamadrid’s promotion to Executive Vice President and CFO, Mr. Lamadrid’s base salary increased to $600,000 effective August 4, 2019 (the first day of fiscal 2020). Prior to his retirement as Chief Executive Officer in recognitionMay 2019, Mr. Jaffe’s base salary was $1,000,000, which was unchanged since fiscal 2013. While serving as an advisor following his retirement as CEO, Mr. Jaffe received a salary of $250,000 at an annualized rate. For fiscal 2019, the Compensation Committee increased responsibility throughMr. Giammatteo’s base salary to $600,000 (from $500,000 at the year andend of fiscal 2018) in order to maintain alignment withalign his cash compensation within a competitive range for CFOs within our compensation philosophy. The increase inpeer group. Mr. Lynch’s salary was also due to his promotion to COOof $1,000,000 remained unchanged in October 2016.

Named Executive Officer

  Title  2016 Base   2017 Base   % Increase 

David Jaffe

  CEO   1,000,000    1,000,000    0.0

Robb Giammatteo

  CFO   500,000    500,000    0.0

Brian Lynch

  President & COO   892,500    950,000    6.4

John Pershing

  CHRO   551,250    551,250    0.0

Duane D. Holloway

  EVP, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary   400,000    440,000    10.0

fiscal 2019.



ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE PROGRAM


The Compensation Committee believes that a substantial percentage of each executive officer’s annual compensation should be tied directly to the financial performance of the Company. Our annual cash incentive compensation (IC) program is a critical element of our executive compensation package, because it is entirely“at-risk” “at-risk” and any earned payouts are solely dependent on Company performance. We structure the Company’s incentive bonus plansThe IC program in effect for fiscal 2019 was designed to encourage the achievement of our seasonal performance that exceedsobjectives whereby payouts under the program are earned based on the achievement of challenging seasonal financial goals. The performance goals established byfor the Compensation Committee. The incentive bonus plans helpfiscal 2019 seasonal IC programs were intended to focus our NEOs on key financial objectives and business drivers, which we believe will supportimprove our financial performance, improvement in overall operations and increase in stockholder value.

Key features of the program include:

Target annual incentive values are expressed for each NEO as a percent of their salary,

100% of payouts for NEOs are tied to Operating Income, which is a financial metric that our Board and Compensation Committee view as one of our key measures of generating stockholder value,

The program is a semi-annual plan, with 50% of the target annual incentives tied to Spring Operating Income performance and 50% of the target annual incentives tied to Fall Operating Income performance,

The maximum opportunity that may be earned under the program is 200% of target, and

Each of our NEOs participated in thisthe IC program in fiscal 2019.
We establish the target amount of an NEO’s IC opportunity as a percentage of base salary for fiscal 2017.the performance period based on the NEO’s position and level within the organization. The seasonal IC payout is equal to their seasonal IC target modified based on performance (adjusted to reflect extraordinary and other special items, including exclusion of the financial effects of any unbudgeted disposal of a business or acquisition, start-up, new joint venture or disposition of an asset) relative to the pre-determined targeted financial performance goals.

The


Ascena Retail Group, Inc.322019 Proxy Statement


Key mechanics of the program include:
a2019proxyimage21.jpg
Operating Income serves as the sole metric in the plan because the Compensation Committee believes it is a core driver of retail business performance and a leading indicator of stockholder value creation. Additionally, the plan’s seasonal structure allows for mid-year development of performance targets and provides an incentive for our NEOs to focus on meeting goals in the second half of the fiscal year in circumstances when business performance andmacro-economic conditions decline or improvechange relative to our budgeted plan.

The Compensation Committee approved modifications to the measurement of Operating Income goals for fiscal 2019 as follows:
ParticipantsOperating Income WeightingMeasurement Detail
CEO: David Jaffe (until retirement)100% Consolidated ascena EnterpriseConsolidated Operating Income for the overall business (“Consolidated ascena Enterprise” results)
Other NEOs (other than Ms. Hufford): Gary Muto, Rob Giammatteo, Brian Lynch
50% Consolidated ascena Enterprise;
50% Segment/ Brand
Blend of Consolidated ascena Enterprise results and the weighted average of Segment/ Brand results (“Segment/ Brand” results)
Dan Lamadrid100% Segment/ BrandWeighted average of Segment/ Brand results
Wendy HuffordN/AReceives 100% IC payout for both seasons in fiscal 2019 in accordance with offer letter
Mr. Jaffe, our former CEO, continued to be measured only on Consolidated Operating Income for the entire organization in fiscal 2019. The Compensation Committee introduced the Segment/ Brand measurement component for our other NEOs (other than Ms. Hufford) to (i) eliminate the potential that a single segment or brand performing below threshold might “zero out” the IC payout for ascena Corporate employees; and (ii) to maintain accountability for individual segment and brand leaders. Additionally, the Segment/ Brand component payout is capped at 100% if any individual segment or brand results are achieved below threshold to ensure that payouts do not exceed target in the event that a portion of the business underperforms.
The Compensation Committee sets the applicable performance goals for oursemi-annual cash incentive bonus programs seasonal IC program at the beginning of the fall and spring seasons using challenging performance targets. These goals are based uponafter considering historical operating trends (particularly prior year results), the external market environment, and the Company’s financial planplans approved by our Board. Our goal setting process is based on historical operating trendsDespite the significant headwinds in our business, target Operating Income goals for each fiscal 2019 season were set above actual fiscal 2018 performance. The Compensation Committee believes that the fiscal 2019 goals were sufficiently rigorous and considers prior fiscal year financial performance as well as various factors impacting our Company.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.302017 Proxy Statement
motivational.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

We establish the target amount of an NEO’s incentive bonus as a percentage of base salary for the performance period based on the NEO’s position and level within the organization. The seasonal bonus payable is equal to their seasonal target bonus modified based on the assessment of performance (adjusted to reflect extraordinary and other special items, including exclusion of the financial effects of any unbudgeted disposal of a business or acquisition,start-up, new joint venture or disposition of an asset) relative to thepre-determined targeted levels.


As shown in the tables below, for the Fall season, a threshold levelachievement of performance would have resulted in a payout equal to 50% of the seasonal incentive targets while in the Spring season a threshold level of performance would have resulted in a payout equal to 25% of the annualseasonal incentive targets (forfor each season. The Compensation Committee established a threshold payout of 25% of target for fiscal 2019, which was lower than the reasons described below). Inone-time threshold payout of 50% of target used in fiscal 2018. A 25% payout at threshold for our NEOs

Ascena Retail Group, Inc.332019 Proxy Statement


more closely aligns with our historical practice and approach to goal-setting. Additionally, in both seasons, a maximum level of performance would yield an incentive payout equal to 200% of their target annual incentives,the seasonal incentive targets for each season, with interpolation between the threshold and target levels and target and maximum levels.

Named Executive Officer

  Annual
Target
Opportunity
(as a % of
Base Salary)
   Annual
Maximum
Opportunity
(as a % of
Base Salary)
   Portion
Allocated
to Fall
Season
50% of
Target)
   Portion
Allocated
to Spring
Season
(50% of
Target)
 

David Jaffe

   150   300   75   75

Robb Giammatteo

   75   150   37.5   37.5

Brian Lynch

   110   220   55   55

John Pershing

   75   150   37.5   37.5

Duane D. Holloway

   75   150   37.5   37.5


Named Executive OfficerThreshold Payout Opportunity (as a % of Base Salary)
Annual
Target
Opportunity
(as a % of
Base Salary)
Annual Maximum Opportunity (as a % of Base Salary)
Portion Allocated
to Fall
Season
(50% of
Target)
Portion  Allocated to Spring  Season (50% of Target)
Gary Muto37.5015030075%75%
Carrie W. Teffner37.5015030075%75%
Dan Lamadrid156012030%30%
Wendy Hufford156012030%30%
David Jaffe37.5015030075%75%
Robb Giammatteo18.757515037.50%37.50%
Brian Lynch31.2512525062.50%62.50%
Fiscal 20172019 — Fall Performance

Our fall performance resulted in no payout for our former CEO, Mr. Jaffe, due to Consolidated ascena Enterprise results falling short of the threshold performance level. Segment/ Brand Operating Income for the fall was achieved between threshold and target performance levels, and when combined with the below-threshold Consolidated ascena Enterprise results, resulted in a payout just above threshold for the rest of our NEOs (other than Ms. Hufford). Ms. Hufford received a payout of 100% of target for the fall season in accordance with her offer letter.

Fiscal 2019 Fall BonusThreshold OI Performance (25% Payout)
($000)
Target OI Performance (100% Payout)
($000)
Maximum OI Performance (200% Payout) ($000)Actual OI Achieved ($000)% of Target AchievedPayout (% Target)
Consolidated ascena Enterprise Performance
(100% of IC for Mr. Jaffe and 50% of IC for all other NEOs)
6,60031,80047,5006,20000
Fiscal 2019 — Spring Performance
Due to a year of rapidly changing customer expectations and an increasingly dynamicsignificant organizational changes with our portfolio of brands, our Consolidated ascena Enterprise results and competitive environment, we did not achieveSegment/ Brand results fell short of threshold Operating Income (OI) performance levels and asduring the spring season. As such, no NEOnone of NEOs (other than Ms. Hufford) received a payout under the fall season ICspring seasonal plan.

Fiscal 2017- Fall Bonus:

  Threshold
OI
Performance
(50% Payout)
   Target OI
Performance
(100% Payout)
   Maximum OI
Performance
(200% Payout)
   Actual
OI
Achieved
($)
   % of
Target
Achieved
   

Payout

(% Target)

 

Corporate Performance

(all NEOs)

   154,783    189,101    226,921    88,874    47.0   0.00

Fiscal 2017 — Spring Performance

Recognizing the challenges faced in target-setting in the current retail environment, Ms. Hufford received a payout of 100% of target for the Spring IC targets the Compensation Committee approved changing payout at threshold from 50%spring season in accordance with her offer letter.


Fiscal 2019 Spring BonusThreshold OI Performance (25% Payout)
($000)
Target OI Performance (100% Payout)
($000)
Maximum OI Performance (200% Payout)
($000)
Actual OI Achieved ($000)% of Target AchievedPayout (% Target)
Consolidated ascena Enterprise Performance (100% of IC for Mr. Jaffe and 50% of IC for all other NEOs)41,20080,200124,700(43,900)00

As a result of target to 25% of target. This change was made to motivate and retain our key executives. The fiscal 2017 spring bonus target shown below represents a modest Operating Income growth over the prior year’s consolidated results.

Similar to the Fall season, we did not achieve threshold performance onand Spring 2019 OI achievement, the NEOs received the following annual incentive payments for fiscal 2019 performance. Spring Operating Income targets, resulting2019 Threshold, Target, and Maximum goals were adjusted to reflect the sale of Maurices in zero payouts for the NEOs:

Fiscal 2017 Spring Bonus:

  Threshold
OI
Performance
(25%
Payout) ($)
   Target OI
Performance
(100%
Payout) ($)
   Maximum
OI
Performance
(200%
Payout) ($)
   Actual
OI
Achieved
($)
   % of
Target
Achieved
   


Payout

(% Target)

 

Corporate Performance

(all NEOs)

   123,700    164,913    197,900    87,025    52.8   0.00

May 2019.


LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.343120172019 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Discretionary Bonus Payment

In order to recognize


Fiscal 2019 Bonus Payments
Fall OI Earned Payment
($)
Spring OI Earned Payment
($)
Total Fiscal 2019 Seasonal Bonus Payments
Gary Muto193,443193,443
Carrie W. TeffnerN/A
Dan Lamadrid98,85098,850
Wendy Hufford120,000120,000240,000
David Jaffe
Robb Giammatteo69,64069,640
Brian Lynch193,443193,443
Mr. Jaffe’s payout reflects the performanceachievement of Consolidated ascena Enterprise OI results. Payouts for the senior leadership teamother NEOs (other than Ms. Hufford) reflect the blended payout for the achievement of Consolidated ascena Enterprise results and Pro-Rata results. Ms. Hufford received a target IC payout for both the criticality of retainingfall and motivating these executives to achieve the Company’s Change for Growth initiatives, and also given the lack of other annual cash incentive compensation, the Compensation Committee approved certain discretionary bonus payouts for some of the NEOs (excluding the CEO and our President and COO) as follows:

Fiscal 2017 — Bonus Payments:

  Fall
Operating
Income OI
Payment
($)
   Spring
OI
Earned
Payment
($)
   Spring
Discretionary
Bonus
($)
   Total
Fiscal
2017
Payments
 

David Jaffe

  $0   $0   $0   $0 

Robb Giammatteo

  $0   $0   $100,000   $100,000 

Brian Lynch

  $0   $0   $0   $0 

John Pershing

  $0   $0   $110,250   $110,250 

Duane D. Holloway

  $0   $0   $88,000   $88,000 

spring seasonal plans in accordance with her offer letter.



LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION


We endeavor to align executive compensation with the achievement of operational and financial results and increases in stockholder value. As discussed above, ourOur long-term incentive compensation program includes significant performance-based compensation under which performance below threshold levels results in no payout.directly links payout opportunities with stock and financial performance. This design is intended to ensure that, other than their base salary,in combination with the IC opportunity described above, a significant portionmajority of theeach NEO’s total compensation for our executives is “at risk” based on Company financial and/or stock performance. However, as described in greater detail below under “Risk Mitigation,” these incentives are designed in a manner that the Compensation Committee believes does not encourage excessive risk taking.

Award Determination for Messrs. Jaffe, Muto, Giammatteo, Lynch, and Lamadrid
Our executive compensation“steady-state” long-term incentive program forcontains three primary vehicles, which are each described in greater detail below. However, as described above, and consistent with awards granted in fiscal 2018, the value of annual long-term incentive awards to our NEOs features 3 key critical elements(other than Ms. Hufford) who were employed at the time fiscal 2019 awards were granted was reduced by 30% by: (i) halving the target value of stock options and (ii) eliminating RSUs. The resulting long-term incentive mix was formulated to link all long-term pay opportunities with substantial stock-related components:

our stock price and/ or financial performance and conserve shares during a period in which our share price was depressed.

ltidiscount.jpg

Ascena Retail Group, Inc.

352019 Proxy Statement


Restricted Stock Units, 20% Stock Options, 20% Stock Options, 10% Perf.-Based LTIP, 60% 30% LTI “Discount” Perf.-Based LTIP, 60% “Steady State” LTI Awards “Steady State” LTI Awards Reduction of Options FY18 Actual LTI Awards Planning process to actual grant
Reward Vehicle

Key Program Components

Performance-Based Cash LTIP Awards

86% of fiscal 2019 LTI awards
  Cash-settled performance-based units with a three-year performance cycle
  Payout is contingent on the attainment of predetermined performance goals that, for awards granted in fiscal 2019, consisted 25% of Comparable Sales and 75% of Adjusted EBITDA growth, with a payout modifier for TSR performance relative to a select group of peers
Nonqualified Stock Options


14% of fiscal 2019 LTI awards

   Time-vested stock options, generally vesting 1/3rd50% per year

over 2 years

   Exercise price is equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date (defined as the average of the high and low Company stock pricesprice on the date of grant)

   Value realized at exercise depends on stock price appreciation

   7-year term (for stock options granted on or after December 11, 2012)

Restricted Stock Units

    Time-vested restricted stock units, generally vesting 1/3rd per year

    Value at vesting depends on stock price

Performance-Based Long-Term Incentive Plan

    Share-settled performance-based units with a three-year performance cycle

    Payout value contingent on the attainment of predetermined performance goals which, for awards granted in fiscal 2017, reflected Net Income and relative TSR


Award Determination for Ms. Hufford
In accordance with Ms. Hufford’s offer letter, the Compensation Committee determined that the fiscal 2019 long-term incentive awards granted to her would not be discounted by 30%. Ms. Hufford received the “steady state” long-term incentive compensation award mix, which delivered her award 60% in the form of a performance-based cash LTIP award, 20% in the form of stock options, and 20% in the form of RSUs. The cash LTIP award granted to Ms. Hufford has the same performance and vesting criteria as the cash LTIP awards granted to the other NEOs and the stock options and RSUs granted to Ms. Hufford vest 50% in each of the next two years.
Promotion and Appointment Grants for Mr. Muto and Ms. Teffner in Fiscal 2019
In connection with Mr. Muto’s promotion to CEO on May 1, 2019, Mr. Muto received a one-time long-term incentive award of performance-based equity (the “Promotion Grant”) with grant date value of $3,850,000. Approximately 60% of the Promotion Grant value was delivered in the form of performance-based RSUs and approximately 40% of the Promotion Grant value was delivered in the form of performance-based stock options. Subject to Mr. Muto’s continued employment (except as provided in his offer letter), the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options subject to the Promotion Grant will be eligible to vest as follows:
25% of each of the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options will be eligible to vest if the closing price of the Company’s stock equals or exceeds $3.00 per share for a 20-consecutive trading day period on or prior to the third anniversary of the grant date (the “$3 Hurdle”);
an additional 25% of each of the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options will be eligible to vest if the closing price of the Company’s stock equals or exceeds $5.00 per share for a 20-consecutive trading day period on or prior to the third anniversary of the grant date (the “$5 Hurdle”); and
the remaining 50% of each of the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options will be eligible to vest if the closing price of the Company’s stock equals or exceeds $7.00 per share for a 20-consecutive trading day period on or prior to the third anniversary of the grant date (the “$7 Hurdle” and with the $3 Hurdle and $5 Hurdle, the “Hurdles”).
The Compensation Committee granted performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options tied to share price hurdles, rather than operational or strategic metrics, given the scale and scope of the Company’s transformation, which will require nimbleness in an ever-changing retail environment and achievement against a wide variety of financial and strategic indicators (some of which are already included as metrics in the Company’s other incentive plans). As a result, the Committee felt that stock price appreciation was and will be a reflective indicator of a successful turnaround effort and that Hurdle goals of $3.00, $5.00, and $7.00 per share, or more than double the stock price on the date of grant at the lowest Hurdle, represented meaningful steps towards our ultimate goal of delivering value to our stockholders. The Compensation Committee also felt that the back-loaded vesting of the Promotion Grant, in combination with the 20-consecutive trading day requirement for the performance conditions of any Hurdle to be deemed satisfied, further aligns the realizable value of the Promotional Grant with the experience of our stockholders.
If a Hurdle is achieved prior to the second anniversary of the grant date of the Promotion Grant, the portion of the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options related to the Hurdle that was achieved prior to the second anniversary will vest on the second anniversary, generally subject to Mr. Muto’s continued employment. Any portion of the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options related to a Hurdle that is not actually achieved by the third anniversary of the grant date will be forfeited for no consideration.
In connection with Ms. Teffner’s appointment as Interim Executive Chair of the Board on May 1, 2019, Ms. Teffner received a one-time long-term incentive award of performance-based equity (the “Appointment Grant”) with a grant date value of $1,050,000. Approximately 60% of the Appointment Grant value was delivered in the form of performance-based RSUs and approximately 40% of the Appointment Grant value was delivered in the form of performance-based stock options. Subject to Ms. Teffner’s continued employment as Interim Chair or service as a member of the Board (except as provided in her offer letter), the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options subject to the Appointment Grant will be eligible to vest in accordance with the same vesting schedule that applies to Mr. Muto’s Promotion Grant.



LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.363220172019 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


EQUITY AWARDS UNDER THE COMPANY’S OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN


NEOs generally receive annual grants of equity awards under our Omnibus Incentive Plan as set forth below. In fiscal 2017, restricted stock unit awards andFor annual equity grants made to each NEO (other than Ms. Hufford), stock options each comprised 20%14% of the total long-term incentive grant value, with the remaining 60%86% made in performance-based LTIP.

Ms. Hufford received a “steady state” annual equity grant in accordance with her offer letter that was comprised of 60% in the form of a performance-based cash LTIP award, 20% stock options, and 20% time-vesting RSUs.

The Compensation Committee generally determines the value of each participant grant in accordance withpre-established grant guidelines (which are primarily based on level of responsibility with the Company or respective brand). Our Chairman and CEO may exercise discretion in his recommendations to the Compensation Committee for grants of long term incentives for all executives (excluding himself) based on individual performance. All grants to employees are made by the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee has a practice of not granting any stock options until at least one business day after the Company has issued its quarterly and/or annual earnings release, as well as the public release of any other pending materialnon-public information.

If an employee ceases to be an employee of the Company for any reason (other than for Cause, as defined under the Omnibus Incentive Plan) and the employee has achieved the Total“Total Years TestTest” (as described in further detail below) as of his or her last day of employment, then all of such employee’s unvested stock options will continue to vest and remain exercisable after the date of termination through the one year anniversary of the vesting date of the last unvested stock option under the applicable stock option award, but not longer than the original term of each stock option.

In addition, all of an employee’s unvested restricted stockRSUs will become fully vested upon achievement of the “TotalTotal Years Test”.Test. Any shares of restricted stockRSUs granted to the employee following achievement ofwho has achieved the “TotalTotal Years Test”Test will be fully vested upon grant, and the employee’s RSUs will become fully vested upon the employee’s death, disability, termination (other than for cause)Cause) or upon a change in control of the Company on or after achievement of the Total Years Test.

The “Total Years Test” means 75 years, based on the sum of (i) the total number of years of employment with the Company or an affiliate, plus (ii) the employee’s age, which willmust be at least age 60. The Company believes that the Total Years Test encourages retention as our executive officers approach retirement age, while also incentivizing our executive officers to drive stockholder value. As ofThe Total Years Test does not apply to LTIP awards, which the employee to be employed through the end of fiscal 2017, none of our NEOsthe applicable performance period to be eligible to receive a payout. At the time Mr. Jaffe ceased employment with the Company in June 2019, he satisfied the Total Years Test.

Test and his outstanding and unvested RSUs became fully vested and his outstanding stock options will continue to vest in accordance with their terms.

The Compensation Committee may also make other equity grants from time to time during the year (“special equity grants”), such as when a new employee is hired (as was the case with Ms. Hufford and Ms. Teffner), a current employee is promoted (as was the case with Mr. Muto ) or in recognition of special achievement. In fiscal 2017, a special equity grant was made to each of Messrs. Pershing and Lynch. Mr. Pershing received a special equity grant for a value equal to $350,000 with atwo-year vesting schedule for retention purposes while Mr. Lynch received special equity grants in fiscal 2017 equal to $121,400 ($20,700 in stock options and $100,700 in RSUs) for his promotion to COO (as discussed below).


Fiscal 20172019 Equity Awards Granted

  NEO  Stock
Options
Granted
(1)
   Restricted
Stock
Units
Granted
(2)
 

David Jaffe

   475,427    155,172 

Robb Giammatteo

   43,396    14,163 

Brian Lynch

   115,4123    48,2173 

John Pershing

   47,547    62,9324 

Duane D. Holloway

   33,208    10,838 


NEO
Stock Options Granted(1)
Restricted Stock Units Granted(2)
Performance Stock Unit Granted
Gary Muto
2,874,337(3)
1,957,627
Carrie W. Teffner
750,000(4)
24,138533,898
Dan Lamadrid14,175
Wendy Hufford13,73130,239
David Jaffe311,383
Robb Giammatteo37,301
Brian Lynch124,337

1
(1)Represents a stock option award made pursuant to the Company’s annual equity grant program, as described above in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under “Long-Term“Long Term Incentive Compensation” and “Equity Awards Under the Company’s Omnibus Incentive Plan.” However, see footnotes 3 and 4 below for the special equity grants to Messrs. Lynch and Pershing.

2
(2)Represents the number of restricted stock unitsRSUs awarded pursuant to the Company’s annual equity grant program, as described above in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” and “Equity Awards Under the Company’s Omnibus Incentive Plan.” However, see footnotes 3 and 4 below for the special equity grants to Messrs. Lynch and Pershing.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis under “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” and “Equity Awards Under the Company’s
Omnibus Incentive Plan.”

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.373320172019 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


3Mr. Lynch received three special equity grants in fiscal 2017
(3)Includes Stock options granted on 10/3/18 as part of his October 2016 promotion to COO consisting of (i) 7,638the annual LTI grant (124,337 stock options (ii) 2,681 RSUs,with a grant price of $3.92) and (iii) 10,363 RSUs. He also received 107,774performance-based stock options and 35,173 RSUs as part of his annual grant. All of these awards have three-year vesting schedules, except for the 10,363 RSU grant, which vest over atwo-year period.

4granted on 5/1/19 in connection with Mr. Pershing received 15,518 RSUs as part of his annual grant cycleMuto’s promotion (2,750,000 stock options with a three-year vesting schedule. In addition,grant price of $1.17).
(4)Performance-based stock options granted on 5/1/19 in recognition of his substantial efforts and leadership through the year and for retention purposes, he received a special equity grant of 47,414 RSUs that vest over atwo-year period.connection with Ms. Teffner’s appointment as Interim Exec Chair.



PERFORMANCE-BASED LONG-TERM INCENTIVE AWARDS


In fiscal 2017,2019, the Company granted the NEOs cash-settled performance-based awards in units generally to be settled in fully vested shares of our common stockpaid following the end of the three-year performance period and the Compensation Committee’s certification of the achievement of pre-established performance goals. Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)Cash LTIP award performance goals are established annually, and the performance period for each plan generally consists of three consecutive fiscal years.annually. The performance goals consist of financial measures and a relative TSR measure. The LTIPscash LTIP awards are intended to give eachtie NEO a substantial incentivepay opportunities to maximize ourlong-term financial and stock price performance.

The following section summarizes cash LTIP award grants made in fiscal 20172019 as well as the results of the LTIPscash LTIP awards vesting following the conclusion of fiscal 2017.2019. Please see prior years’ proxies for descriptions of other outstanding LTIP grants.

Grants made in Fiscal 2017:2019: FY21 LTIP
In fiscal 2019, each NEO (other than Ms. Teffner) received an annual long-term incentive plan grant under the Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “FY21 LTIP”). The performance period for the FY21 LTIP

is fiscal years 2019 through 2021. Vesting of the 2019FY21 LTIP grants (made in fiscal 2017) is contingent onupon our average achievement of Net Income target (50%three one-year Comparable Sales goals over a three-year performance period (25% weighted) and our average achievement of three one-year Adjusted EBITDA growth goals over a three-year performance period (75% weighted) and is subject to a relative TSR overall payout modifier.

fy20ltiexhibita02.jpg

The Compensation Committee established the three one-year goals for Comparable Sales and Adjusted EBITDA growth at the beginning of the performance period. The goals for the first year of the performance period were established based upon prior year actual results. The goals for subsequent years are determined based on increases over the prior year’s actual results (i.e., goals for the second year are determined based on actual results from the first year of the performance period). The cash LTIP award payout is subject to adjustment based upon the Company’s achievement of TSR relative to a broader indexselect group of peers (“TSR Peer Group”). The modifier provides that payouts be adjusted to 80% of earned dollars for threshold relative TSR achievement, 100% of earned dollars for target relative TSR achievement, and 120% of earned dollars for maximum TSR achievement, with linear interpolation for results that fall between threshold and target, and target and maximum. Our TSR Peer Group includes several of the companies in our benchmarking peer group as well as additional apparel retailers that are business competitors.

The Compensation Committee established the “Specialty Stores” Global Industry Classification Standard groupFY21 LTIP goals after considering the macro-economic environment, prior year actual performance, and our long-range plan. The Compensation Committee transitioned to establishing one-year goals that are based off prior year results due to the challenges of setting 3-year goals during a period of significant change in our business and brand portfolio. The Comparable Sales and Adjusted EBITDA growth goals tie our executive’s incentive opportunities to top-line growth as well as profitability, while the TSR modifier ensures alignment with market capitalization greater than $500 million (50% weighted).our stockholders’ realization of value over the three-year performance period.

FY21 LTIP grants will vest at 50% of the grant target for performance at threshold, 100% at target performance level, and 200% of target for performance achieving or exceeding maximum level; performance between these levels will be calculated using linear interpolation.interpolation, and are subject to modification based on relative TSR achievement as described above. If performance targets are achieved, any payouts under the 2019FY21 LTIP will be paid outmade following the end of fiscal 2019.FY21. Subject to achievement of performance conditions, the 2019FY21 LTIP (granted in fiscal 2017) awards will be settled in stock.

Due to the challenges with setting three-year financial goals in this volatile industry, Net Income for the 2019 LTIP was calculated on aone-year basis (fiscal 2017). Based on our performance during the fiscal year, we did not achieve threshold levels under this portion of the 2019 LTIP. However, a partial payout is still achievable if we achieve strong relative TSR over the three-year performance period (fiscal years 2017-2019).

  Performance Measure  Performance Range  Performance Achieved
  Threshold  Target  Maximum  

Net Income

(50% weight)

  $118,600,000  $130,500,000  $142,300,000  $42,200,000

Relative TSR

(50% weight)

  Top 75%  50%  Top 25%  To be calculated following
completion of3-year
performance period

The following table details the target value of Performance Stock Units (“PSUs”) awarded under the 2019 LTIP:

  NEO  Target
Value of
Award
 

David Jaffe

  $3,780,000 

Robb Giammatteo

  $345,000 

Brian Lynch

  $856,800 

John Pershing

  $378,000 

Duane D. Holloway

  $264,000 

Grants vesting after Fiscal 2017: FY17 LTIP POA

In connection with our acquisition of ANN in August 2015, we assumed certain obligations under a change of control severance plan to maintain the level of salary and bonus opportunities for ANN employees for not less than two years following the acquisition (which ended August 21,

cash.


LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.383420172019 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2017). To honor our obligations to the ANN employees, and to maintain a uniform


Performance Measure 
Performance Range 
Performance
Achieved
 ThresholdTargetMaximum
FY Comparable Sales (as % of Prior FY’s Actual Comparable Sales for each of the three one-year period) (25% Weight)100%102%104%101.9%
EBITDA Growth (75% Weight)FY2019 EBITDA (as % of prior FY’s actual EBITDA)100%103%111%0%
FY2020 and FY2021 EBITDA (as % of prior FY’s actual EBITDA)100%107%115%Calculated following the completion of applicable fiscal year
Grants vesting after Fiscal 2019: FY19 LTIP
The fiscal year 2019 cash LTIP compensation scheme across the Company’s brands, we restructured the LTIP awards outstanding in fiscal 2016 to provide for bonus opportunities consistent with those in place at ANN prior to the acquisition.

Accordingly, in lieu of granting one LTIP with a three-year performance period for fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee established three performance opportunity awardsaward (“POAs”FY19 LTIP”) under our Long-Term Incentive Programs with a combined value equal to one three-year award. Each plan can be settled in either fully vested shares of common stock or cash (at the Committee’s discretion):

a 2016 Cash-Settled Long-Term Incentive Program award was granted having a one-year performance period, with a value equal toone-sixth of an annual award (the “FY16 LTIP POA”);

a 2017 Long-Term Incentive Program award was granted having a two-year performance period, consisting of fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017, with a value equal totwo-sixth of an annual award (the “FY17 LTIP POA”); and

a 2018 Long-Term Incentive Program award was granted having a three-year performance period consisting of fiscal 2016, fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018, with a value equal toone-half of an annual award (the “FY18 LTIP POA”).

These three LTIP awards were designed by the Compensation Committee to give eligible executives, including each NEOof our NEOs at the time grants were made in 2016 (Ms. Teffner, Ms. Hufford and Mr. Lamadrid were not employed with us at the time of the FY19 LTIP grant), a substantial incentive to maximize our long-term financial performance following the acquisition of ANN and provide the Compensation Committee with the flexibility to determine whether the awards should be settled in either cash or RSUs.

The FY17 LTIP POA wasperformance. Grants were scheduled to vest after the completion of fiscal 2017; the following table details the2019, subject to performance at or above threshold levels. The target value of PSUs awarded under the 2017 LTIP:

  NEO  Target
Value of
Award
 

David Jaffe

  $1,260,000 

Robb Giammatteo

  $81,428 

Brian Lynch

  $240,975 

John Pershing

  $103,359 

Duane D. Holloway

  $57,000 

Payoutspayout opportunities for the FY17FY19 LTIP POA were contingent on our achievement on three metrics — EBITDA, Return on Investment (“ROI”), and relative TSR:

are shown below:
50% of the target grant value
NEO(1)
Target
Value of
Award
Gary Muto$2,750,000
Dan Lamadrid$115,000
David Jaffe$3,780,000
Robb Giammatteo$345,000
Brian Lynch$856,800
(1)Neither Ms. Hufford nor Ms. Teffner was employed at the time of the FY19 LTIP grant. Mr. Lamadrid received a pro-rated FY19 LTIP grant.
The FY19 LTIP award was contingent onupon the achievement of EBITDA relative topre-determined performance goals;

50% of the target grant value was contingent on the achievement of ROI relative topre-determined performance goals;

Payout for performance between threshold, target,a one-year adjusted Net Income goal (covering fiscal year 2017) and maximum values on these metrics will be calculated using linear interpolation; and

The payout value calculated based on these two metrics was then subject to further adjustment based on the Company’sa 3-year relative TSR achieved duringgoal measuring Company TSR relative to a broader index of companies in the performance period; the final payout is determined by multiplying the adjusted dollars by 80% for minimum threshold level, 100% for target achievement level“Specialty Stores” Global Industry Classification Standard Group (covering fiscal years 2017, 2018, and 120% for maximum achievement level.2019).

Given the many uncertainties in the retail industry, the Compensation Committee set FY19 LTIP targets it considered challenging but still achievable in an industry wherewith significant competition for experienced proven executives is significant.executives. The adjusted Net Income target was established by placing a 10% premium on the prior fiscal year’s actual results (i.e., the target adjusted Net Income goal was equal to 110% of fiscal 2016 adjusted Net Income), while threshold performance was equal to fiscal 2016 actual adjusted Net Income and maximum performance was equal to 120% of fiscal 2016 actual adjusted Net Income. As summarizedshown in the charts below, the Company did not achieve the threshold EBITDAadjusted Net Income goal and was atbelow the threshold level for relative TSR:

  Performance Measure  Performance Range   Performance
Achieved
2
   Payout as
% Target
  Threshold   Target1   Maximum     

EBITDA3

  $1,085,000   $1,356,000   $1,628,000   $1,046,000   0%

ROI

   35%    40%    50%    59.5%   Eliminated

Relative TSR

   Top 75%    26%-75%    Top 25%    Top 75%   80%

TSR.
Performance Measure
Performance Range 
Performance
Achieved
(1)
Payout as % Target
ThresholdTargetMaximum
One Year Adjusted Net Income Goal (50% Weight)$118.6M$130.5M$142.3M$42.0M0
Relative Total Shareholder Return Goal (50% Weight)Top 75%50%Top 25%93%0

1The EBITDA target level of achievement was set based on the sum of: (i) fiscal 2015 actual EBITDA achieved times 110% plus (ii) fiscal 2016 actual EBITDA achieved times 110%.

(1)Represents adjusted Net Income achievement for fiscal 2017 and relative TSR achievement for the performance period (i.e., July 31, 2016 through July 27, 2019).

As a result of the below threshold performance on the One Year Adjusted Net Income and relative TSR targets, no payouts were made for the FY19 LTIP. The One Year Adjusted Net Income is defined as the Company’s net income for its 2017 fiscal year (i.e., July 31, 2016 to July 29, 2017) as reported on an adjusted non-GAAP basis in the Company’s year-end earnings release for such fiscal year in

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.393520172019 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE


the non-GAAP reconciliation table(s), and adjusted to eliminate the effects of any integration, restructuring or purchase price accounting expenses.


ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION — COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2Represents EBITDA achieved over thetwo-year performance period consisting of fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017.

3EBITDA targets and achievement level calculated based on legacy Ascena (excluding ANN).

In relation toACTIONS


Sign-on Cash Bonus for Ms. Hufford
Ms. Hufford received a one-time cash bonus of $100,000 in accordance with her offer letter upon the ROI goal, thecommencement of her employment in October 2018. The Compensation Committee determined to provide this inducement award in cash in order to conserve shares during a period of depressed share price. If, prior to the first anniversary of her start date, Ms. Hufford resigns or is terminated due to a violation of company policy or conduct giving rise to immediate discharge, she has to repay the cash bonus within 90 days of the cessation of her employment.
Retention Cash Bonuses for Messrs. Giammatteo and Lamadrid in Fiscal 2019
On May 1, 2019, the Company entered into retention agreements with Messrs. Giammatteo and Lamadrid. Mr. Giammatteo was eligible to receive a retention bonus of up to $700,000 in cash, payable in two equal installments on August 31, 2019 and August 31, 2020. Mr. Lamadrid is eligible to receive a retention bonus of up to $550,000 in cash, payable in two equal installments on May 17, 2019 and August 31, 2020, subject to his continued employment on each payment date. Mr. Giammatteo resigned as CFO prior to August 31, 2019, and thus did not receive any payout under the retention bonus. Mr. Lamadrid received the first installment payment of his retention bonus on May 17, 2019. In accordance with the terms of his retention letter agreement, Mr. Lamadrid is required to repay retention bonus amounts previously paid to him if he resigns for any reason or is terminated by the Company (including due to violation of company policy or for cause) prior to the date that the formulaic payout calculated was not truly representative of our performance during the relevant period. As a result, the Compensation Committee exercised negative discretion and reduced the payout for the ROI under the F17 LTIP POA to zero for all participants. As a result, no payouts were made for this LTIP grant.

August 31, 2019 retention bonus installment is paid.



TRANSFORMATION BONUS OPPORTUNITY


In March 2017, the Compensation Committee approvedadopted the adoption of a Transformation Bonus Program (“TBP”) under the 2016Company’s Omnibus Incentive Plan. This programThe TBP was introduced to enhance theCompany performance of the Company and create long-term stockholder value by motivating key executives to deliver significant cost savings consistent with the ChangeCompany’s “Change for GrowthGrowth” enterprise transformation program and by encouraging retention of those key executives. The Compensation Committee identified eight executives to participate in light of the competitive market for talent. All NEOs are eligible to participant in this program with the exceptionTBP, including each of our CEO.

Under this program:

ExecutivesNEOs (other than our former CEO, Mr. Jaffe) who were employed at the CEO) will betime the TBP was adopted. Under the TBP, participants were eligible to earn bonus awards payable in cash based upon the achievement of cost reduction targets (“Realized Savings”) from January 1, 2017 to the end of fiscal 2021,2021.

The achievementFollowing the conclusion of fiscal 2018, the Compensation Committee determined that the Company had met 100% of its tranche 1 goal of $150 million in cumulative Realized Savings will be calculated at the endand 45% of fiscal years 2018 through 2021, ensuringits tranche 2 goal of $250 million in cumulative Realized Savings. This level of performance resulted in a multi-year performance period,

Payouts will be calculated based on a multiple of the eligible executive’s basepreliminary earned value equal to 1.56x each participant’s salary in effect onas of January 1, 2017. However, the 2018 earned values were reduced by 50% to equal 0.78x each participant’s salary as in effect as of January 1, 2017 which vary by participant from 0.5x to a maximum cumulative multiple of 5.5x over the full performance period,

No bonuses will be paid if Realized Savings does not equal $150 million, nor will any incremental bonuses be paid for Realized Savings in excess of $450 million over the entire performance period,

The amount payable to a participant in any fiscal year is subject to an annual maximum bonus cap which considers both IC payouts and transformation bonus opportunity, and

Payouts in any fiscal year will be reduced by 50% ifsince the Company doesdid not achieve its threshold annual Operating Income levelslevel under the IC plan for fiscal 2018. Under the relevantTBP, these earned values were scheduled to be payable within 60 days following the end of fiscal year.2019.

We believe

In June 2019, management and the transformationCompensation Committee reviewed the TBP’s objectives in the context of ourthe ongoing business and realizationleadership transitions described above. At that time, management determined that the TBP was no longer aligned with the Company’s re-oriented transformation strategy following the sale of significant cost savings are criticalmaurices and announced wind-down of dressbarn and that the Realized Savings goals under the TBP were no longer consistent with the Company’s strategy. Accordingly, in June 2019, the Compensation Committee, on the recommendation of management, canceled the TBP payments earned with respect to fiscal 2018 performance (and payable within 60 days following the successend of fiscal 2019).
Following the conclusion of fiscal 2019, Gary Muto, our organization.CEO and the only remaining participant of the TBP following the changes to our leadership team over fiscal 2019, recommended that the Compensation Committee exercise negative discretion and terminate all other recently completed, ongoing, and future tranches of the TBP. As such, thisone-time opportunitya result, the Compensation Committee terminated the TBP in October 2019, including any payments that would have otherwise been paid with a multi-year performance period was introducedrespect to ensure our key executive talent is continuously motivated to lead our organization toward success on these endeavors.

fiscal 2019 performance.



EXECUTIVE PERQUISITES


We generally do not offer significant perquisites to our NEOs and they represent a relatively small portion of the NEOs’ total compensation. The cost of perquisites for our NEOs is included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table. The Company offers broadOur NEOs participate in the Company’s broad-based health and welfare programs whichthat are available to our full-time employees generally.

KEY NEO COMPENSATION PROGRAM CHANGES FOR FISCAL 2018

Recognizing the impact of industry changes and financial performance on our stock price, management proactively recommended — and the Compensation Committee approved — several significant compensation changes for fiscal 2018:

No Named Executive Officer received base salary increases for Fiscal 2018 except for Brian Lynch due to his August 2017 promotion from EVP, COO to President and COO,

A one-time 30% overall reduction in the NEO long-term incentive grant value for fiscal 2018 (including for the CEO), and

The use of only performance-based long-term incentives and stock options for the majority of the NEOs (with approximately 85% of FY17 LTI awards being delivered in the form of long-term incentives). Management and the Compensation Committee believe this strongly aligns management’s compensation with stockholder interests.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.403620172019 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE


KEY NEO COMPENSATION — COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

PROGRAM CHANGES FOR FISCAL 2020


Recognizing the impact of significant changes to our business during fiscal 2019 and the impact of financial performance on our stock price, Compensation Committee approved several significant compensation changes for fiscal 2020:
Annual Incentive Compensation Program
Following significant organizational changes with our portfolio of brands, the Compensation Committee, with input from SBCG, reviewed the design of our executive compensation programs with a focus on how the programs can better support our commitments to our customers, vendors, and stockholders. We have identified a return to profitability as a significant operational milestone for our business, and we believe that collaboration across our organization under a “one ascena” mindset is critical to achieving this objective and creating value for our stockholders. In order to simplify the design of our IC program and focus on or operational priorities, we have made the following changes to our IC program for fiscal 2020:
Measure 100% Consolidated ascena Enterprise results for all NEOs, including our CEO, to strengthen our enterprise foundation and further encourage cross-brand collaboration. Returning to full Enterprise profitability is critical to delivering value to our stockholders;
Change the performance metric to Adjusted EBITDA, which continues our focus on profitability and also serves as a measure of cash generation, which is critical to honoring our commitments to customers, vendors, and stockholders;
Shift to an annual performance cycle to holistically measure our longer-term trending performance over the full year. The annual cycle will provide a simplified payout structure while providing the ability to still set goals that account for the seasonality of our business.
Long-Term Incentive Program
At the end of fiscal 2019, the Compensation Committee, with input from SBCG, reviewed the long-term incentive program design in the context of shares available under the Omnibus Incentive Plan during a period of depressed share price and the 30% discount that has been applied to the NEOs’ long-term incentive grants in fiscal 2018 and 2019. Given the challenging current business environment, the Compensation Committee aimed to (i) simplify long-term incentive compensation; (ii) manage share usage; and (iii) tie value realization for the NEOs more closely to stockholder value creation. As a result, the Compensation Committee approved the following long-term incentive compensation program changes for fiscal 2020:
Eliminate the cash-settled performance-based cash LTIP in order to simplify the long-term incentive program and ensure that payouts under the program are directly tied to stock price and stockholder value; and
Grant a fixed number of stock options by level - In October 2019, Mr. Muto was granted 350,000 stock options and each of Mr. Lamadrid and Ms. Hufford was granted 100,000 stock options. The grant-date fair value of these awards will represent a significant decline from the grant-date fair value of “steady state” long-term incentive awards as well as the discounted long-term incentive awards received in fiscal 2019 given the drop in our share price. Ms. Teffner will not receive an equity award in fiscal 2020.
The decision to grant a fixed number of stock options by level is intended to manage shares under our Omnibus Incentive Plan. In a depressed share price environment, it is critical that we control share usage and dilution as well as avoid granting potential windfall awards to our executives. Further, making the grant entirely in stock options is intended to align our NEOs’ realizable pay opportunities with company performance, and provides additional upside to our NEOs if we achieve strong stock price performance and deliver value to our stockholders.
Dan Lamadrid’s Promotion to Chief Financial Officer Starting in Fiscal 2020
On July 25, 2019, the Company announced the promotion of Dan Lamadrid to Chief Financial Officer, succeeding Mr. Giammatteo, effective August 4, 2019.
Pursuant to the offer letter, Mr. Lamadrid will receive a base salary of $600,000 per year and will be eligible to participate in the Company’s performance-based incentive compensation program at a target level of 75% of Mr. Lamadrid’s base salary.
Pursuant to the offer letter, in October 2019, Mr. Lamadrid will receive, subject to his continued employment and approval by the Compensation Committee, a promotion grant of 100,000 time-vesting stock options (the “Time-Based Options”) and a grant of 50,000 performance-vesting stock options (the “Performance-Based Options”). Subject to Mr. Lamadrid’s continued employment, the Time-Based Options will vest in equal installments on the first and second anniversaries of the grant date. Subject to Mr. Lamadrid’s continued employment, the Performance-Based Options will be eligible to vest in accordance with the same vesting schedule that applies to Mr. Muto’s Promotion Grant.
We believe that the decisions for fiscal 2020 will continue to: (i) reduce stockholder dilution; and (ii) align our NEOs’ payout opportunities with the performance of our stock and our stockholder’s ability to realize value.



Ascena Retail Group, Inc.412019 Proxy Statement


MANAGEMENT OF COMPENSATION-RELATED RISK


Management and the Compensation Committee utilize various procedures to mitigate the probability of our compensation programs resulting in excessive risk-taking:

Risk Assessment — Each year, ourthe Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultants conductconsultant conducts a risk-assessment of our incentive programs. The assessment is presented to and reviewed by the Compensation Committee.

Our Board has reviewed and considered whether our compensation programs and policies create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. In that regard, we design our programs in a balanced and diversified manner while also creating significant, yet appropriate, incentives for strong performance based on our business and strategic plan.

In most cases, each component of our performance-based compensation program is subject to a limit on the cash paid or the number of shares delivered.

We believe that our compensation programs reflect a balance of short-term, long-term, guaranteed and performance based compensation in order not to encourage excessive risk-taking.

A significant portion of our compensation program includes performance-based compensation with multi-year performance targets and vesting.equity-based compensation. We believe that this helps to ensure that our NEOs and other employees focus on the health of our business and the success of broad performance metrics that will deliver stockholder value over time and discourages excess risk-taking by our NEOs and other employees.

The Compensation Committee also evaluates on a regular basis our overall mix of equity-based incentive awards relative to cash-based incentive awards to align our executive’sexecutives’ incentives with stockholder interests and long-term value.

Clawback Policy — Pursuant to the executive compensation clawback policy approved by the Compensation Committee in fiscal 2016, if the Board determines that any cash ornon-cash incentive compensation (excluding time-based stock options) awarded to, or received by, an executive officer (each a “covered person”) was based on any financial results or operating metrics that were misstated, we will seek to recover from the officerscovered person such compensation (in whole or in part) as the Board deems appropriate under the circumstances and as permitted by law.

If a restatement occurs, the Board will look at the incentive compensation paid or awarded in each fiscal year in the three-year period prior to the date the Company is required to prepare the restatement (any year in such three-year period, a “Look-Back Year”).

If the Board determines that incentive compensation has been paid or awarded to a covered person in a Look-Back Year, the Board may, in its sole discretion, regardless of fault, cancel or require repayment of all or a portion of any excess incentive compensation (i.e., the excess of the amount that would have been paid or awarded had such incentive compensation been calculated based on the restatement results).



STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


Our Board believes it is important that our executive officers and other members of our leadership team have, and are recognized both internally and externally as having, long-term financial interests that are aligned with those of our stockholders. In fiscal 2012, pursuant to the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board adopted stock ownership guidelines for ourthat apply to the CEO (the “Ownership Guidelines”). In June 2016, the Ownership Guidelines were amended and restated to, among other things, expand the group of persons subject to the guidelinesOwnership Guidelines to include all members of our leadership team, including each of the Company’s executive officers and presidents of each of the Company’s brands. The Ownership Guidelines with respecttable below sets forth the ownership guidelines applicable to ourthe CEO became effective in September 2011, and with respect to all other members of our leadership, became effective in June 2016.

NEOs.
NEOStock
Ownership
Guidelines

CEO

6x base salary

All Other NEOs

1x base salary

Our

The Stock Ownership Guidelines are effective as of September 21, 2011 for the CEO has satisfiedand June 2, 2016 for our other NEOs and the target ownership requirement underrest of our leadership team that is subject to the Ownership Guidelines.Guidelines (the “Effective Date”). The otherOwnership Guidelines authorize a transition period for members of our leadership team haveto achieve their required ownership level of five years from the later of the Effective Date and the date the individual commences employment at ascena. As of August 4, 2019, all of our NEOs are still within the transition period to satisfy these requirements. the Ownership Guidelines based upon the date of their commencement of employment.
Ownership for purposes of the Ownership Guidelines includes: (i) shares of our stock acquired on the open

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.372017 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

market or purchased through the exercise of stock options or settlement of any other type of equity award (such as restricted stock, RSUs, deferred stock or


Ascena Retail Group, Inc.422019 Proxy Statement


a deferred stock unit); (ii) vested equity awards (other than stock options or stock appreciation awards); (iii) vested shares of our stock allocated under anytax-qualified plan; and (iv) unvested RSUs (but excluding unvested performance-based equity awards). Shares held individually or jointly or by a “family member” (as defined in the securities laws which would include certain trusts, family partnerships and foundations) would count as “owned” by the individual. Stock options awards do not count towards the stock ownership requirement. The Ownership Guidelines are posted on the “for investors”“investors” page of the Company’s website at www.ascenaretail.com, accessible through the “Investor Relations Menu.”

“Corporate Governance” tab.



PROHIBITION ON HEDGING AND PLEDGING OF COMPANY STOCK


Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our directors and executive officers are prohibited from engaging in hedging or monetization transactions with respect to our stock, including through the use of financial instruments such as exchange funds, prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, puts, calls, collars, forwards and other derivative instruments, or through the establishment of a short position in our securities. Additionally, our non-employee directors and executive officers are prohibited from holding our stock in a margin account or otherwise pledging our stock as collateral for a loan.



TAX DEDUCTIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS


As a general matter, the Compensation Committee reviews and considers the various tax and accounting implications of compensation vehicles that we utilize. With respect to accounting matters, the Compensation Committee examines the accounting cost associated with equity compensation in light of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718.

With respect to Section 162(m), the

The Compensation Committee considers the impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Prior to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”), Section 162(m) generally deniesdenied a corporate tax deduction for annual compensation exceeding $1 million$1,000,000 paid to the chief executive officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers of a public company (for purposes of this section only “Covered Employees”), other than the chief financial officer. The limitation, however, does not applyofficer, subject to an exception for compensation payable based on achievement ofpre-established objective performance goals if certain requirements are met. WePrior to the effective date of the TCJA, we generally endeavorendeavored to structure our performance-based incentive compensation for our NEOs to qualify as performance-based under Section 162(m) of the Code where it iswas reasonable to do so while meeting our compensation objectives. Nonetheless, from time to time certainnon-deductible compensation may be paid andobjectives, although the Board and the Compensation Committee reservereserved the authority to awardnon-deductible compensation in circumstances where doing so was deemed appropriate circumstances.and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. In addition, it is possible that some compensation paid pursuant to certain equity awards may benon-deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code.

The TCJA eliminated the ability to rely on the performance-based compensation exception for amounts deductible effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. In addition, under the legislation, the definition of “Covered Employees” was expanded to include any person who served as the chief (principal) financial officer. An employee who is a Covered Employee for a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016, and any time during the fiscal year, will remain a Covered Employee for all future years. As a result, beginning in fiscal 2019, the Company may no longer take a deduction for any compensation paid to Covered Employees (i.e., our NEOs) in excess of $1,000,000, except to the extent that it is subject to a “written binding contract” in effect as of November 2, 2017 (“transition relief”) that is not later modified in any material respect. No assurance can be given that any compensation otherwise subject to a deduction limit will qualify for an exception under this transition rule.


LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.433820172019 Proxy Statement



COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT


The following report of the Compensation Committee does not constitute soliciting material and will not be deemed to be filed with the SEC under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act or incorporated by reference into any document so filed except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this Compensation Committee Report by reference therein.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the above Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

This report is provided by the following directors, who currently comprise the Compensation Committee.
Compensation Committee:

Linda Yaccarino, Chair
Kate Buggeln
Kay Krill
Carl Rubin Chair

Mark Lasry

Randy L. Pearce

Linda Yaccarino



LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.443920172019 Proxy Statement



SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE


The table below summarizes information concerning compensation for fiscal 2017, fiscal 20162019 (which reflects 53 weeks)week), fiscal 2018 and fiscal 20152017 (which reflects 53 weeks) for our Named Executive Officers (NEOs). —

Name

 

 

Year

 

  

Salary
($)

 

  

Bonus
($)
(1)

 

  

Stock
Awards
($)
(2)

 

  

Option
Awards
($)
(3)

 

  

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
(4)

 

  

All Other
Compensation
($)
(6)

 

  

Total
($)

 

 

 

David Jaffe

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,644,308

 

 

 

 

 

 

917,574

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

121,895

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,683,777

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

  2016   1,019,231     1,259,995   1,260,002   1,007,179   81,941   4,628,348 
  

 

2015

 

 

 

  

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

2,543,750

 

 

 

  

 

2,380,800

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

53,570

 

 

 

  

 

5,978,120

 

 

 

 

Robb Giammatteo

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

423,888

 

 

 

 

 

 

83,754

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,461

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,139,103

 

 

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

  2016   509,615     81,257   81,250   181,084   25,589   878,795 
  

 

2015

 

 

 

  

 

377,538

 

 

 

  

 

115,591

 

 

 

  

 

167,250

 

 

 

  

 

76,800

 

 

 

  

 

25,545

 

 

 

  

 

6,735

 

 

 

  

 

769,459

 

 

 

 

Brian Lynch

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

936,394

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,153,413

 

 

 

 

 

 

222,745

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

107,754

 

 

  

 

2,420,306

 

 

 

President and

Chief Operating Officer

 

        

 

John Pershing

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

551,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

110,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

728,531

 

 

 

 

 

 

91,766

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37,954

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,519,751

 

 

Executive Vice President and

Chief Human Resources Officer

  2016   557,812     103,356   103,360   203,805   41,576   1,009,909 
  

 

2015

 

 

 

  

 

500,308

 

 

 

  

 

147,766

 

 

 

  

 

80,280

 

 

 

  

 

128,000

 

 

 

  

 

180,985

 

 

 

  

 

21,846

 

 

 

  

 

1,059,185

 

 

 

 

Duane D. Holloway

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

440,769

 

 

 

 

 

 

88,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

324,368

 

 

 

 

 

 

64,091

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,708

 

 

 

 

 

 

919,936

 

 

Executive Vice President, General Counsel

and Assistant Secretary

 

  2016   215,385     57,000   57,000   1,451     330,836 

NameYear
Salary
($)(1)
Bonus
($)(2)
Stock Awards
($)(3)
Option Awards
($)(4)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)(5)
All Other Compensation
($)(5)
Total
($)
Gary Muto20191,038,462998,390908,820193,44360,8263,199,941
CEO20181,016,0263,445,000350,0001,104,00033,2755,948,301
Carrie W. Teffner2019261,538363,288187,50077,754890,080
Interim Executive Chair of the Board        
Dan Lamadrid2019429,807275,00025,23298,85112,584841,474
EVP and Chief Financial Officer        
Wendy Hufford2019338,461340,00055,61154,128788,200
SVP and General Counsel        
David Jaffe2019837,500544,920586,7641,969,184
Former Chief Executive Officer20181,000,0001,890,000611,100387,30067,9513,956,351
 20171,000,0004,644,308917,574121,8956,683,777
Robb Giammatteo2019603,84666,39669,64021,192761,074
Former EVP and Chief Financial Officer2018500,000187,50062,500487,45020,6001,258,050
 2017500,000100,000423,88883,75431,4611,139,103
Brian Lynch2019876,923221,320193,443658,6021,950,288
Former President and
Chief Operating Officer
2018998,8463,445,000350,0001,064,93848,7005,907,484
 2017936,3941,153,413222,745107,7542,420,306
(1)Amounts shown reflect the retention bonus paid to Mr. Lamadrid in FY19 and to Ms. Hufford for a sign on bonus ($100,000) and guaranteed FY19 Fall ($120,000) and Spring bonus ($120,000) paid at target. Amounts shown reflect the discretionary bonus paid for fiscalFiscal 2017 to Messrs. Giammatteo, Pershing and Holloway. No bonuses were awarded under the annual incentive plan.Mr. Giammatteo.

(2)ReflectsFor fiscal 2019 stock award grants to Mr. Muto and Ms. Teffner, the amount reflects the aggregate grant date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of (i) performance-based RSUs granted to Mr. Muto in connection with his promotion to CEO on May 1, 2019 (the “Muto Promotion RSU”), (ii) performance-based RSUs granted to Ms. Teffner in connection with her appointment as Interim Executive Chair of the Board on May 1, 2019 (the “Teffner Appointment RSU”) having an aggregate grant date fair value of $272,288, (iii) time-vested RSUs granted to Ms. Teffner in October 2018 in respect of her service as a non-employee director prior to her appointment as Interim Executive Chair of the Board (the “Teffner Director RSU”) having an aggregate grant date fair value of $91,000 and (iv) time-vested RSUs granted to Ms. Hufford in October 2018 (the “Hufford Annual RSU”). For awards granted in fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, the amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value calculation in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the valuation of the Teffner Director RSU, the Hufford Annual RSU and the equity awards granted in fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 equity based awards are discussed in “Stock-Based“Stock Based Compensation” in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2017. For fiscal 2017, the amounts in the table include the target dollarAugust 3, 2019. The grant date fair value of awards approved by the Compensation Committee for each NEO under our FY 2019 LTIP program. Such LTIP award target dollar valueMuto Promotion RSU and the value, assuming maximum achievement level, are as follows: David Jaffe (target value: $3,780,000; maximum value: $7,560,000); Robb Giammatteo (target value: $345,000; maximum value: $690,000); Brian Lynch (target value: $856,800; maximum value: 1,713,600); John Pershing (target value: $378,000; maximum value: $756,000); Duane D. Holloway (target value: $264,000; maximum value: $528,000). The FY 2019 LTIP awards for our NEOs, if earned, will be stock-settled.Teffner Appointment RSU were derived using a Monte Carlo valuation simulation method, which used the following assumptions:



Ascena Retail Group, Inc.452019 Proxy Statement


Grant DateMay 1, 2019
Remaining Performance Period3.00 years
Grant Date Closing Price$1.18
Compounded Risk-Free Interest Rate (3.00-yr)2.25%
Historical Volatility (3.00-yr)74.22%
Cost of Equity (Used for Derived Service Period Only)13.01%

(3)Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value calculation in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the valuation of equity based awards are discussed in “Stock-Based“Stock Based Compensation” in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2017.August 3, 2019. For Mr. Muto, this includes the aggregate grant date fair value ($221,320) calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of stock options granted to Mr. Muto on October 3, 2018 in connection with the Company’s annual equity award grants (the “Muto Annual Option”), as well as the aggregate grant date fair value ($687,500) calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718 of performance-based stock options granted to him in connection with his promotion to CEO on May 1, 2019 (the “Muto Promotion Option”). For Ms. Teffner, this includes the aggregate grant date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of performance-based stock options granted to her in connection with her appointment as Interim Executive Chair of the Board on May 1, 2019 (the “Teffner Appointment Option”). Assumptions used in the valuation of the Muto Annual Option and all other stock option awards to NEOs (other than the Muto Promotion Option and Teffner Appointment Option) are discussed in “Stock Based Compensation” in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 3, 2019. The grant date fair value of the Muto Promotion Option and the Teffner Appointment Option were derived using a Monte Carlo valuation simulation method, which used the following assumptions:

Grant DateMay 1, 2019
Remaining Performance Period3.00 years
Grant Date Closing Price$1.18
Exercise Price$1.17
Contractual Term7.00 Years
Compounded Risk-Free Interest Rate (7.00-yr)2.39%
Historical Volatility (7.00-yr)56.41%
Cost of Equity (Used for Derived Service Period Only)13.01%

(4)The amounts shown for fiscal 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 20172019 represent amounts earned under (i) the 162(m) Plan withby each NEO in respect to Messrs. David Jaffe, Giammatteo, Lynch, Pershing and Holloway, as applicable. The amendment and restatement of the 2016 Omnibus Incentive PlanCompany's seasonal IC programs in December 2015 incorporatedeffect for each of the 162(m) Plan intofiscal years. For fiscal 2019, the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, and we renamedamounts include seasonal IC payments received by the revised plan “the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.”

NEOs for the fall season. None of the NEOs received a payout under the seasonal IC program for the spring season of fiscal 2019.(5)We have no defined benefit pension plans. All earnings in our nonqualifiednon-tax qualified Executive Retirement PlanPlans are at market values and are therefore omitted from the table.

(5) A detailed breakdown of “All Other Compensation” for fiscal 2019 is provided in the table below.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.464020172019 Proxy Statement


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

(6)A detailed breakdown of “All Other Compensation” for fiscal 2017 is provided in the table below


ALL OTHER COMPENSATION

Name

  

Contributions

to Executive
Officer’s

Defined
Contribution
Plan

Accounts
($)

   

Contributions

to Executive
Officer’s

Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Plan Accounts
($)

   

Payments

made for
Supplemental
Retirement
Benefits
($)

   

Personal

Use  of
Company
Car
Service
($)
(1)

   Total
($)
 

 

David Jaffe

 

  

 

 

 

 

10,800

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

89,762

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

21,333

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

121,895

 

 

 

 

 

Robb Giammatteo

 

  

 

 

 

 

10,800

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

20,661

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

31,461

 

 

 

 

 

Brian Lynch

 

  

 

 

 

 

10,965

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

96,790

 

 

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

107,754

 

 

 

 

 

John Pershing

 

  

 

 

 

 

10,800

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

27,154

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

37,954

 

 

 

 

 

Duane D. Holloway

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,708

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,708

 

 

 

 


Name
Contributions to Executive Officer’s Defined Contribution Plan Accounts
($)
Contributions to Executive Officer’s Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan Accounts ($)
Personal Use of Company Car Service
($)
(1)
Severance Payments
($)(2)
Non-Employee Director Fees Paid in Cash
($)(3)
Total
($)
Gary Muto11,00038,80711,01960,826
Carrie W. Teffner77,75477,754
Dan Lamadrid12,88412,884
Wendy Hufford
David Jaffe11,00058,36515,434494,1877,778586,764
Robb Giammatteo11,00010,19221,192
Brian Lynch11,00055,13821,951570,513658,602

(1)Represents the aggregate incremental cost to the Company for personal use of Company car service.service and other transportation for commuting purposes.

(2)For Mr. Jaffe, amounts in this column include cash severance payments totaling $115,384 paid to Mr. Jaffe through the end of fiscal 2019 pursuant to his separation agreement and $31,549 representing the value of accelerated RSUs realized by Mr. Jaffe as of his last date of employment. For Mr. Lynch, amounts in this column represent a lump sum payment of $416,667 paid to Mr. Lynch upon his termination of employment in accordance with his offer letter and cash severance payments totaling $153,846 paid to Mr. Lynch through the end of fiscal 2019 pursuant to his separation agreement.
(3)Amounts in this column represent cash fees paid to Ms. Teffner and Mr. Jaffe for their service as non-employee directors during
fiscal 2019. Ms. Teffner received cash fees for her service as a non-employee director until her appointment as Interim Executive Chair of the Board on May 1, 2019. Mr. Jaffe received cash fees for his service as a non-employee director following his retirement as an employee of the Company on June 28, 2019.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.474120172019 Proxy Statement



GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS IN FISCAL 20172019


The following table provides information regarding the grants of plan-based awards made to the NEOs during fiscal 2017:

Name

 

Grant

Date or

    Estimated Future Payouts
UnderNon-Equity

Incentive Plan Awards
  Estimated Future
Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
  

All

Other

Stock
Awards:

Number
of

Shares

  

All

Other
Option
Awards:
Number
of Secu-

rities

Unde-

  

Exercise
or Base

Price of

  

Grant
Date
Fair
Value

of

 
 

Perfor-

mance
Period

  Plan* 

Thres-

hold ($)

  Target
($)
  Max
($)
  

Thres-

hold

($)

  Target
($)
  Max
($)
  

of Stock

or Units
(#)
(4)

  

rlying

Options
(#)
(4)

  

Option

Awards
($/Sh)

  

Equity

Awards
($)

 

 

David Jaffe

 

 

FY17

  

 

2016 Plan(1)

 

 

 

 

375,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,000,000

 

 

       
 9/21/2016  RSU        155,172     864,308 
 9/21/2016  NQ         475,427   5.56   917,574 
 FY19 LTIP

 

  POA(2)

 

     

 

1,890,000

 

 

 

  

 

3,780,000

 

 

 

  

 

7,560,000

 

 

 

    

 

Robb Giammatteo

 

 

FY17

  

 

2016 Plan(1)

 

 

 

 

93,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

375,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

750,000

 

 

       
 FY17-21  2016 Plan(3)  500,000    2,750,000        
 9/21/2016  RSU        14,163     78,888 
 9/21/2016  NQ         43,396   5.56   83,754 
 FY19 LTIP

 

  POA(2)

 

     

 

172,500

 

 

 

  

 

345,000

 

 

 

  

 

690,000

 

 

 

    

 

Brian Lynch

 

 

FY17

  

 

2016 Plan(1)

 

 

 

 

261,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,045,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,090,000

 

 

       
 FY17-21  2016 Plan(3)  1,000,000    5,500,000        
 9/21/2016  RSU        35,173     195,914 
 9/21/2016  NQ         107,774   7.51   208,004 
 9/21/2016  NQ         7,638   5.56   14,741 
 12/7/2016  RSU        10,363     80,002 
 12/7/2016  RSU        2,681     20,697 
 FY19 LTIP

 

  POA(2)

 

     

 

428,400

 

 

 

  

 

856,800

 

 

 

  

 

1,713,600

 

 

 

    

 

John Pershing

 

 

FY17

  

 

2016 Plan(1)

 

 

 

 

103,359

 

 

 

 

 

 

413,438

 

 

 

 

 

 

826,875

 

 

       
 FY17-21  2016 Plan(3)  551,250    3,031,875        
 9/21/2016  RSU        47,414     264,096 
 9/21/2016  RSU        15,518     86,435 
 9/21/2016  NQ         47,547   5.56   91,766 
 FY19 LTIP  POA(2)     189,000   378,000   756,000     

 

Duane D. Holloway

 

 

FY17

  

 

2016 Plan(1)

 

 

 

 

82,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

330,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

660,000

 

 

       
 FY17-21  2016 Plan(3)  220,000    1,210,000        
 9/21/2016  RSU        10,838     60,368 
 9/21/2016  NQ         33,208   5.56   64,091 
  FY19 LTIP

 

  POA(2)

 

              

 

132,000

 

 

 

  

 

264,000

 

 

 

  

 

528,000

 

 

 

                

2019:

 Grant Date or Performance Period 
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards 
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards
All Other Stock Awards:
Number of Shares of Stock or Units
(#)
(3)
All Other Option Awards:
Number of Securities Underlying Options
(#)(3)
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)(4)
Grant Date Fair Value of stock and option awards Equity Awards ($)
NamePlan*Threshold ($)Target
($)
Max
($)
Thres-hold
($)
Target
($)
Max
($)
Gary Muto10/3/2018NQ       124,3373.92221,320
 5/1/2019NQ       2,750,0001.17687,500
 5/1/2019RSU      1,957,627  998,390
 FY19
Omnibus Incentive Plan(1)
375,0001,500,0003,000,000       
 10/29/2018
FY21 LTIP(2)
750,0001,500,0003,000,000       
Carrie W. Teffner5/1/2019NQ       750,0001.17187,500
 5/1/2019RSU      533,898  272,288
 10/22/2018RSU      24,138  91,000
 FY19
Omnibus Incentive Plan(1)
96,575386,301772,603   24,138  91,000
Dan Lamadrid10/3/2018NQ       14,1753.9225,232
 FY19
Omnibus Incentive Plan(1)
63,750255,000510,000       
 10/29/2018
FY21 LTIP(2)
85,500171,000342,000       
Wendy Hufford10/3/2018NQ       30,2393.9254,128
 10/3/2018RSU      13,731  55,610
 FY19
Omnibus Incentive Plan(1)
  480,000       
 10/29/2018
FY21 LTIP(2)
91,200182,400364,800       
David Jaffe(5)
10/29/2018NQ       311,3833.83544,920
 FY19
Omnibus Incentive Plan(1)
375,0001,500,0003,000,000       
 10/29/2018
FY21 LTIP(2)
1,890,0003,780,0007,560,000       
Robb Giammatteo(6)
10/3/2018NQ       37,3013.9266,396
 FY19
Omnibus Incentive Plan(1)
112,500450,000900,000       
 10/29/2018
FY21 LTIP(2)
225,000450,000900,000       
Brian Lynch(7)
10/3/2018NQ       124,3373.92221,320
 FY19
Omnibus Incentive Plan(1)
312,5001,250,0002,500,000       
 10/29/2018
FY21 LTIP(2)
750,0001,500,0003,000,000       

* Plan

Omnibus Incentive Plan = the Ascena Retail Group, Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan
NQ =Non-qualified stock optionsoption (granted under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan)

RSU = Restricted Stock UnitUnits (granted under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan)

FY19 LTIP = 2019 Long-Term

FY21 LTIP= 2021 3-Yr Long-term Incentive Plan (granted under the Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan)

FY17-21 = Transformation Bonus Opportunity with annual and cumulative measurement periods from January 2017 through the end of fiscal 2021.

POA = Performance Opportunity Awards — the FY19 LTIP, if earned, will settle in stock.

2016 Plan = Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Plan

(1)Amounts representrepresents the range of annual cash incentive awards under the spring and fall IC programs the NEO was potentially entitled to receive based on the achievement of performance goals during fiscal 20172019 under the 2016Omnibus Incentive Plan. See “2016 Omnibus Plan” underFor Ms. Teffner, the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”amounts are pro-rated for more information regarding the bonus targets underportion of fiscal 2019 that she was employed as Interim Executive Chair of the 2016 Plan.Board. In accordance with the terms of Ms. Hufford's offer letter, she was entitled to an amount equal to her target annual incentive for each


Ascena Retail Group, Inc.482019 Proxy Statement


of the fall and spring seasons of fiscal 2019. See "Omnibus Incentive Plan" under the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" for more information regarding the bonus targets under the Omnibus Incentive Plan.
(2)Amounts represent the range of dollar values of the FY19FY21 LTIP award that each eligible NEO is entitled to receive based on the achievement of his performance goals established for the three year FY19FY21 LTIP. See “2016 Omnibus Plan”“Performance Based Long Term Incentive Awards” under the “CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information regarding the bonus targets under the 2016 Plan.plan. If earned, these awards settle in stock.cash.

(3)

Amounts reflect range of awards under Transformation Bonus Opportunity. Measurement period ranges from January 2017 through the end of fiscal 2021. Maximum total incentive opportunity in table for Messrs. Giammatteo, Lynch and Pershing is 5.5x base salary (excluding

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.422017 Proxy Statement


GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS IN FISCAL 2017

annual incentive awards) or 4.5x base salary (including annual incentive awards). Mr. Lynch’s award calculation is based on his fiscal 2018 salary of $1 million. Maximum opportunity for Mr. Holloway shown in table is 2.75x base salary (excluding annual incentive awards) or 3x base salary (including annual incentive awards). For a description of the Transformation Bonus Opportunity awards, see discussion above in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under “Transformation Bonus Opportunity.”

(4)(3)Represents stock option and RSU awards made during fiscal 2019 pursuant to the Company’s annual equity grant program, as described above in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” and “Equity Awards Under the Company’s Omnibus Incentive Plan.” In addition to the annual equity grants, Mr. LynchMuto and Ms. Teffner received three special equity grants as part of his October 2016 promotion to COO consisting of (i) 7,638performance-based stock options (ii) 2,681and performance-based RSUs with their Promotion Grant and (iii) 10,363 RSUs. Also, Mr. Pershing receivedAppointment Grant, respectively. For Ms. Teffner, the amount also includes RSUs granted with respect to her services as a special award grantnon-employer director prior to her service as Interim Executive Chair of 47,414 RSUs. All of these awards have a three year vesting schedule, except for the 10,363 RSUs to Mr. Lynch and the 47,414 RSUs to Mr. Pershing, both of which vest over a two-year period.Board.

(4) The exercise price of stock options is based on the average of the high and low prices of the Company’s common stock on the date
of grant.
(5)
Upon his retirement as an employee of the Company effective June 28, 2019, Mr. Jaffe satisfied the Total Years Test, and as a result, his outstanding stock option awards, including the stock options granted to him on October 29, 2018, will continue to vest in accordance with their terms. Upon his retirement, Mr. Jaffe forfeited the FY21 LTIP award granted to him on October 29, 2018.
LOGO
(6)Upon his departure form the Company effective August 31, 2019, Mr. Giammatteo forfeited the stock option award granted to him on October 3, 2018 and the FY21 LTIP award granted to him on October 28, 2018.
(7)Upon his departure from the Company effective May 1, 2019, Mr. Lynch forfeited the stock option award granted to him on October
3, 2018 and the FY21 LTIP award granted to him on October 28, 2018.


Ascena Retail Group, Inc.494320172019 Proxy Statement



OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCALYEAR-END 2017

2019


The following table provides information relating to outstanding equity awards held by the NEOs at July 29, 2017:

    Option Awards   Stock Awards

  Name and Plan

 

 

Grant
Date

 

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)

 

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)

 

 

Option
Exercise
Price
($)

 

 

Option
Expiration
Date

 

   

Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)

 

 

Market
Value
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
(1)

 

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not
Vested
(#)

 

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of
 Unearned 

Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
.Have Not
Vested
($)
(2)

 

David Jaffe

                    

NQ(3)

   9/18/2008   500,000     7.50   9/18/2018          

NQ(3)

   9/24/2009   160,000     8.84   9/24/2019          

NQ(3)

   12/9/2009   300,000     15.00   12/9/2019          

NQ(3)

   9/23/2010   160,000     11.70   9/23/2020          

NQ(3)

   9/23/2010   150,000     15.00   9/23/2020          

NQ(3)

   3/9/2011   88,644     15.55   3/9/2021          

NQ(3)

   9/21/2011   160,000     13.14   9/21/2021          

NQ(3)

   9/20/2012   250,000     20.79   9/20/2022          

NQ(4)

   9/25/2013   281,250   93,750   19.91   9/25/2020          

NQ(5)

   9/23/2014   232,500   232,500   14.12   9/23/2021          

NQ(6)

   9/16/2015   99,762   199,526   12.39   9/16/2022          

NQ(7)

   9/21/2016     475,427   5.56   9/21/2023          

RSU(12)

   9/16/2015             62,774   145,636    

RSU(13)

   9/21/2016             155,172   359,999    

PRSU(22)

 

   

 

9/21/2016

 

 

                 

 

464,945(24)

 

 

   

 

1,078,672 

 

 

Robb Giammatteo

                    

NQ(9)

   12/11/2013   7,500   2,500   20.41   12/11/2020          

NQ(5)

   9/23/2014   7,500   7,500   14.12   9/23/2021          

NQ(8)

   9/29/2015   5,926   11,853   13.48   9/29/2022          

NQ(7)

   9/21/2016     43,396   5.56   9/21/2023          

RSU(15)

   9/29/2015             4,013   9,310    

RSU(13)

   9/21/2016             14,163   32,858    

PRSU(22)

 

   

 

9/21/2016

 

 

                 

 

   42,435(24)

 

 

   98,449 

Brian Lynch

                    

NQ(11)

   6/3/2015   25,000   25,000   15.19   6/3/2022          

NQ(8)

   9/29/2015   17,576   35,154   13.48   9/29/2022          

NQ(7)

   9/21/2016     107,774   5.56   9/21/2023          

NQ(18)

   12/7/2016     7,638   7.51   12/7/2023          

RSU(19)

   6/3/2015             30,000   69,600    

RSU(15)

   9/29/2015             11,899   27,606    

RSU(13)

   9/21/2016             35,173   81,601    

RSU(20)

   12/7/2016             2,681   6,220    

RSU(21)

   12/7/2016             10,363   24,042    

PRSU(23)

 

   

 

9/21/2016

 

 

                 

 

             (23)

 

 

   

 

856,800 

 

 

August 3, 2019:
  Option Awards Stock Awards
Name and Plan(1)
Grant DateNumber of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable
(#)
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable
(#)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned OptionsOption Exercise Price
($)
Option Expiration Date Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
(#)
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($)
(2)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards:
Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
(#)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout  Value of Unearned Shares,  Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)
(3)
Gary Muto           
NQ(4)
10/23/2015142,518  12.8010/23/2022     
NQ(5)
9/21/2016150,94375,472 5.569/21/2023     
NQ(6)
9/27/2017180,412180,413 2.379/27/2024     
NQ(7)
10/3/2018 124,337 3.9210/3/2025     
NQ(8)
5/1/2019 
2,750,0001.175/1/2026     
RSU(9)
9/29/2015      53,33417,600  
RSU(10)
9/21/2016      24,6298,128  
RSU(11)
9/27/2017      500,000165,000  
RSU(12)
5/1/2019        1,957,627646,017
FY19 LTIP(13)
9/21/2016         687,500
FY20 LTIP(14)
9/27/2017         537,500
            
Carrie W. Teffner           
NQ(8)
5/1/2019  750,0001.175/1/2026     
RSU(15)
10/22/2018      24,1387,965  
RSU(12)
5/1/2019        533,898176,186
            
Dan Lamadrid           
NQ(16)
9/27/201718,90037,801 2.379/27/2024     
NQ(7)
10/3/2018 14,175 3.9210/3/2025     
RSU(17)
9/27/2017      14,8444,899  
FY19 LTIP(13)
9/27/2017         28,750
FY20 LTIP(14)
9/27/2017         42,500
            
Wendy Hufford           
NQ(7)
10/3/2018 30,239 3.9210/3/2025     
RSU(18)
10/3/2018      13,7314,531  
            
David Jaffe           
NQ(4)
9/24/2009160,000  8.849/24/2019     
NQ(4)
12/9/2009300,000  15.009/26/2019     
NQ(4)
9/23/2010160,000  11.709/26/2019     
NQ(4)
9/23/2010150,000  15.009/26/2019     
NQ(4)
3/9/201188,644  15.559/26/2019     
NQ(4)
9/21/2011160,000  13.149/26/2019     
NQ(4)
9/20/2012250,000  20.799/26/2019     
NQ(4)
9/25/2013375,000  19.919/26/2019     
NQ(4)
9/23/2014465,000  14.129/26/2019     
NQ(4)
9/16/2015299,288  12.399/26/2019     

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.504420172019 Proxy Statement


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCALYEAR-END 2017

    Option Awards   Stock Awards

  Name and Plan

 

 

Grant
Date

 

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)

 

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)

 

 

Option
Exercise
Price
($)

 

 

Option
Expiration
Date

 

   

Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)

 

 

Market
Value
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
(1)

 

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)

 

 

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
 Unearned 

Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
(2)

 

John Pershing

                    

NQ(3)

   3/9/2011   12,500     15.55   3/9/2021          

NQ(3)

   9/21/2011   20,000     13.14   9/21/2021          

NQ(3)

   9/20/2012   25,000     20.79   9/20/2022          

NQ(4)

   9/25/2013   18,750   6,250   19.91   9/25/2020          

NQ(5)

   9/23/2014   12,500   12,500   14.12   9/23/2021          

NQ(8)

   9/29/2015   7,538   15,079   13.48   9/29/2022          

NQ(7)

   9/21/2016     47,547   5.56   9/21/2023          

RSU(14)

   1/27/2012             28,000   64,960    

RSU(15)

   9/29/2015             5,104   11,841    

RSU(13)

   9/21/2016             15,518   36,002    

RSU(16)

   9/21/2016             47,414   110,000    

PRSU(22)

 

   

 

9/21/2016

 

 

                 

 

46,494

 

(24)

 

   

 

107,866 

 

 

Duane D. Holloway

                    

NQ(10)

   1/21/2016   7,692   15,385   7.63   1/21/2023          

NQ(7)

   9/21/2016     33,208   5.56   9/21/2023          

RSU(17)

   1/21/2016             5,027   11,663    

RSU(13)

   9/21/2016             10,838   25,144    

PRSU(22)

 

   

 

9/21/2016

 

 

                                      

 

32,472

 

(24)

 

   

 

75,335 

 

 


  Option Awards Stock Awards
Name and Plan(1)
Grant DateNumber of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable
(#)
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable
(#)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned OptionsOption Exercise Price
($)
Option Expiration Date Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
(#)
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($)
(2)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards:
Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
(#)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout  Value of Unearned Shares,  Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)
(3)
NQ(5)
9/21/2016316,951158,476 5.566/28/2023     
NQ(6)
9/28/2017315,000315,000 2.446/28/2023     
NQ(19)
10/29/2018 311,383 3.836/28/2023     
            
Robb Giammatteo           
NQ(4)
12/11/201310,000  20.4112/13/2020     
NQ(4)
9/23/201415,000  14.129/23/2021     
NQ(4)
9/29/201517,779  13.489/29/2022     
NQ(5)
9/21/201628,93014,466 5.569/21/2023     
NQ(6)
9/27/201732,21632,217 2.379/27/2024     
NQ(7)
10/3/2018 37,301 3.9210/3/2025     
RSU(10)
9/21/2016      4,7221,558  
PRSU(20)
9/21/2016        
42,435(21)
14,003
FY20 LTIP(14)
9/27/2017         93,750

*Plan/Type of Award:

NQ =Non-qualified stock option

(granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan)

RSU = Restricted Stock Units

(granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan)

FY19 LTIP = 20193-Yr Long-term Incentive Plan

(granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan)
FY20 LTIP = 2020 3-Yr Long-term Incentive Plan (granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan)
FY21 LTIP = 2021 3-Yr Long-term Incentive Plan (granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan)

(1)The amounts in this column equal
(1)
Mr. Lynch forfeited all of his then-outstanding stock option, RSU and LTIP awards upon his departure from the numberCompany on May 1, 2019, which was prior to the end of sharesthe Company’s fiscal year. Mr. Giammatteo forfeited all of restrictedhis outstanding stock units indicated inoption, RSU and LTIP awards upon his departure from the previous column multiplied byCompany on August 3, 2019, which was the closing pricelast day of our common stock $2.32 on July 28, 2017.the Company’s fiscal year.

(2)The amounts in this column equal the number of shares of performance share unitsRSUs indicated in the previous column multiplied by $0.33, which was the closing price of our common stock $2.32 on July 28, 2017.August 2, 2019, the last trading day of our 2019 fiscal year.

(3)The amounts in this column equal the number of performance-based RSUs or performance share units, as applicable, indicated in the previous column multiplied by $0.33, which was the closing price of our common stock on August 2, 2019, the last trading day of our 2019 fiscal year.
(4)This award is fully vested.

(4)
(5)The remaining stock options related to this award vest on September 21, 2019.
(6)The remaining stock options related to this award vest on September 27, 2019.
(7)One half of the stock options related to this award vest on each of the first and second anniversaries of the grant date.
(8)One quarter of the stock options subject to this award are eligible to vest based on achievement of a $3 stock price hurdle; an additional 25% of the stock options subject to this award are eligible to vest based on achievement of a $5 stock price hurdle; and the remaining 50% of the stock options subject to this award are eligible to vest based on achievement of a $7 stock price hurdle.
(9)The remaining RSUs related to this award vest in substantially equal installments on the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date.
(10)The remaining RSUs related to this award vest on September 21, 2019.
(11)The remaining RSUs related to this award are eligible to vest on June 30, 2020.
(12)25% of the options relatingRSUs subject to this award vestedare eligible to vest based on September 25, 2016achievement of a $3 stock price hurdle; an additional 25% of the RSUs subject to this award are eligible to vest based on achievement of a $5 stock price hurdle; and the remaining vesting occurred on September 25, 2017.

(5)25%50% of the options relatingRSUs subject to this award vestedare eligible to vest based on September 23, 2017 and the remaining balance will vest on September 23, 2018.achievement of a $7 stock price hurdle.


(6)One third of the options relating to this award vest equally over the next year on September 16th.

(7)One third of the options relating to this award vest equally over the next two years on each September 21st.

(8)One third of the options relating to this award vest equally over the next year on September 29th

(9)25% of the options relating to this award vested on December 11, 2016 and the remaining will vest on December 11, 2017.

(10)One third of the options relating to this award vest equally over the next two years on January 21st.

(11)25% of the options relating to this award vested on June 3, 2017 and the remaining will vest equally over the next two years on June 3.

(12)One third of the restricted stock units related to this award vested on September 16, 2017 and the remaining balance will vest on September 16, 2018

(13)One third of the restricted stock units related to this award vests equally over the next two years on each September 21st.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.514520172019 Proxy Statement


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCALYEAR-END 2017


(13)For Mr. Muto, the FY19 LTIP award is denominated in cash and, if earned, will be settled in cash. Represents the dollar value, at threshold, of the portion of the NEO’s FY19 LTIP tied to achievement of the relative TSR metric during the FY19 LTIP performance period.
(14)20%Represents the dollar value, at threshold, of the restricted stock units relatingportion of the NEO’s FY20 LTIP tied to thisachievement of the relative TSR metric during the FY20 LTIP performance period. As noted above, although the FY20 LTIP awards are cash-denominated and, if earned, will be settled in cash, the relative TSR-based portion of each NEO’s FY20 LTIP is an equity award vested on January 27, 2017under FASB ASC Topic 718 given their relative market performance measure and are considered equity incentive awards for SEC disclosure purposes. See “Performance-Based Long-Term Incentive Awards” under the remaining 35% will“Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information regarding the bonus targets under the Omnibus Incentive Plan.
(15)Represents the RSUs granted to Ms. Teffner in respect of her service as a non-employee director during fiscal 2019, which are eligible to vest on January 27, 2018.October 22, 2019.

(15)One third of the restricted stock units related to this award vests equally over the next two years on each September 29th.

(16)50% of the restrictedThe remaining stock units relating to this award vested on September 21, 2017 and the remaining 50% will vest on September 21, 2018.

(17)One third of the restricted stock units related to this award vests equally over the next two years on each January 21st.

(18)One third of the options related to this award vests equally overvest in substantially equal installments on the next two years on each December 7th.

(19)25%second and third anniversaries of the restricted stock unitsgrant date.
(17)The remaining RSUs related to this award vests equally overvest in substantially equal installments on the next two yearssecond and third anniversaries of the grant date.
(18)One half of the RSUs subject to this award are eligible to vest on each June 3rd.of the first and second anniversaries of the grant date.

(20)
(19)One thirdhalf of the restricted stock unitsoptions related to this award vests equally over the next two yearsvest on each December 7th.

(21)50% of the restricted stock units relating to this award vested on December 7, 2017first and second anniversaries of the remaining 50% will vest on December 7, 2018.grant date.

(22)
(20)Represents the number of unvested performance-based restricted stock units granted under our FY19 LTIP program multiplied by $0.33, which was the closing price of our common stock $2.32 on July 28,2017.August 2, 2019, the last trading day of our 2019 fiscal year.

(23)
(21)The FY19 LTIP award for Mr. Lynch is denominated in cash and, if earned, will be settled in shares of our stock. The actual number of shares granted, if any, will be determined based on our stock price onPRSUs subject to the date the shares are issued.

(24)This award amount was determined by taking the target value of the NEO’s FY19 LTIP and dividing it by the closing price of our common stock on September 19, 2016.2016, which was $8.12. In October 2019, the Compensation Committee certified that the performance goals related to this award were achieved below threshold, resulting in no payout.




LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.524620172019 Proxy Statement



Y OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN FISCAL 20172019


The following table details information about stock options exercised (if any) by our NEOs and stock awards held by our NEOs that vested during fiscal 2017:

  

Option Awards

   

Stock Awards(2)

  Name Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
  Value Realized on
Exercise
($)
(1)
   Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
  

  Value Realized   

on Vesting

($)(3)

David Jaffe

            31,396    250,226

Robb Giammatteo

            8,256    39,698

Brian Lynch

            20,951    60,002

John Pershing

            21,552    104,819

Duane D. Holloway

               2,513    12,263

2019:
 Option Awards 
Stock Awards(2)
NameNumber of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
Value Realized on
Exercise
($)
(1)
 Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
  Value Realized  
on Vesting
($)(3)
Gary Muto 567,293589,830
Carrie W. Teffner 
Dan Lamadrid 7,42335,333
Wendy Hufford 
David Jaffe 134,826378,804
Robb Giammatteo 6,72729,090
Brian Lynch 23,74794,945

(1)The value realized upon the exercise of the stock options reflect the number of stock options multiplied by the difference between the closing stock price of our common stock on the date of the exercise and the exercise price of the stock options.

(2)Stock Awards include awards of restricted stock restricted stock units, and performance share units.RSUs.

(3)The value realized upon vesting of the stock awards is based on the closing stock price of our common stock on the date the awards vested.



LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.534720172019 Proxy Statement


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT,


CEO PAY RATIO

SEC rules require us to disclose the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO, Gary Muto, to the annual total compensation of our median employee (the “CEO Pay Ratio”). For Fiscal 2019, our median employee’s annual total compensation was $6,828. As set forth in the Summary Compensation Table, Mr. Muto’s annual total compensation for Fiscal 2019 was $3,199,941.  Accordingly, the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Muto to our median employee was 469:1.
In calculating the CEO Pay Ratio, we began by determining that we had (49,506 total) employees as of June 1, 2019 determination date. As is permitted under SEC rules, we eliminated 204 employees from the calculation located in countries in the table below (approximately 0.004% of our total employee population).
EXCLUDED
Jurisdiction(Employees as
of June 1,
2019)
India9
Hong Kong104
Korea79
China12
TOTAL204
To identify our median employee, we used total taxable compensation for the period January 1, 2019 through and including June 1, 2019 and annualized the compensation of all permanent employees who worked for us for less than a full calendar year. We then selected an employee we believe to be statistically most representative of the median and calculated Fiscal 2019 compensation for the median employee using the same methodology we use for our named executive officers as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.
Pay ratios that are reported by our peers may not be directly comparable to ours because of differences in the composition of each company’s workforce, as well as the assumptions and methodologies used in calculating the pay ratio, as permitted by SEC rules.


Ascena Retail Group, Inc.542019 Proxy Statement


EMPLOYMENT LETTERS, SEPARATION AGREEMENTS AND RETIREMENT AGREEMENTS


We have entered into an employment agreement with David Jaffe and employment letters with Messrs. Giammatteo, Lynch, Pershingall of our currently-employed NEOs. An “employment letter” does not have a term of employment. Rather, the letter sets forth the minimum compensation and Holloway. Effective August 1, 2017, as further discussed below, our employment agreement with David Jaffe terminated and was replacedbenefits that the executive will receive during his or her employment. An executive with an employment letter.

An employment agreement providesletter is an “employee at-will” (i.e., the Company may terminate such executive at any time with a time period (or “term”) during which he will be employed byor without cause, subject to any applicable severance provisions, including the Company.

An “employment letter” does not have a term of employment. Rather, the letter sets forth the minimum compensation and benefits that the executive will receive during his or her employment.

An executive with an employment letter is an “employeeat-will” (i.e., the Company may terminate such executive at any time with or without cause, subject to any applicable severance provisions, including the Executive Severance Plan).

Executive Severance Plan).

The Compensation Committee believes that these employment arrangements are important to our executives and to the Company. Each executive benefits from clarity of the terms of his or her employment. The Company enhances its ability to retain the services of its executives. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the terms of the employment arrangements and amends them as necessary to remain competitive and to carry out its objectives. Details of the terms of the specific employment arrangements are discussed below.

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

David Jaffe

On March 5, 2014,LETTERS

Gary Muto
Effective May 1, 2019, the Company entered into an employment agreementletter with David Jaffe, its Chief Executive OfficerGary Muto in connection with his appointment as CEO (the “Old Employment Agreement”“Muto Offer Letter”). The Old Employment Agreement was due to expire by its terms on September 21, 2017. Effective AugustMuto Offer Letter supersedes Mr. Muto’s June 1, 2017, employment offer letter with the Old Employment Agreement terminated and was replaced with an employment letter as discussed below.

The Old Employment Agreement provided for an annualCompany.


Pursuant to the Muto Offer Letter, Mr. Muto continues to receive a base salary of $1,000,000 per year or such higher salary as may be determined by the Company’s board of directors or the Compensation Committee. The Old Employment Agreement entitled Mr. Jaffeand is eligible to participate in all the Company’s retirement, insurance, and bonus,performance-based incentive and other benefit plans, includingcompensation program at a target level of 150% of Mr. Muto’s base salary (with a maximum payout opportunity of 200% of target, or $3,000,000).

As set forth in the Muto Offer Letter, Mr. Muto received a one-time long-term incentive award of performance-based equity (the “Promotion Grant”) under the Omnibus Incentive Plan,Plan. The Promotion Grant had a grant date value of $3,850,000, with approximately 60% of the value granted in the form of performance-based RSUs and approximately 40% of the value granted in the form of performance-based stock options. Subject to Mr. Muto’s continued employment, the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options subject to the usePromotion Grant are eligible to vest as follows:

25% of a car service ateach of the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options are eligible to vest if the closing price of the Company’s expensecommon stock equals or exceeds $3.00 per share for a 20-consecutive trading day period on or prior to the third anniversary of the grant date (the “$3 Hurdle”);

an additional 25% of each of the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options are eligible to vest if the closing price of the Company’s common stock equals or exceeds $5.00 per share for a 20-consecutive trading day period on or prior to the third anniversary of the grant date (the “$5 Hurdle”); and

the remaining 50% of each of the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options are eligible to vest if the closing price of the Company’s common stock equals or exceeds $7.00 per share for a 20-consecutive trading day period on or prior to the third anniversary of the grant date (the “$7 Hurdle” and collectively with the $3 Hurdle and $5 Hurdle, the “Hurdles”).

If a Hurdle is actually achieved prior to the second anniversary of the grant date of the Promotion Grant, the portion of the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options related to the Hurdle that was achieved prior to the second anniversary will vest on the second anniversary, subject to Mr. Muto’s continued employment. Any portion of the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options related to a Hurdle that is not actually achieved by the third anniversary of the grant date will be forfeited for no consideration.

If Mr. Muto’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or Mr. Muto resigns for “good reason” (defined as necessarydescribed below under the heading “Executive Severance Plan”), in each case prior to a change in control of the Company, he will become vested in a pro-rata portion of the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options for himwhich the applicable Hurdle was achieved prior to perform his dutiestermination.

If Mr. Muto’s employment with the Company terminates due to his death or disability prior to the second anniversary of the grant date of the Promotion Grant, Mr. Muto (or his estate or legal representative, as applicable) will receive full vesting of the performance-based RSUs and responsibilities, includingperformance-based stock options for transportationwhich the applicable Hurdle was actually achieved prior to and from his home and office.

Intermination due to death or disability.


If Mr. Muto has a “Change in Control Related Termination” (defined as described below under the event that Mr. Jaffe’s employment terminated without causeheading “Executive Severance Plan”) on or by Mr. Jaffe for good reason (a “Qualifying Termination”), other than upon or during thewithin 24 months following a change in control, under the Old Employment Agreement, Mr. Jaffe was entitled to receive an amount equal to two times his base salary payable in installments for a period of 24 months following the date of termination.

In the event that Mr. Jaffe incurred a Qualifying Termination uponand on or during the 24 months following a change in control, under the Old Employment Agreement, Mr. Jaffe was entitled to receive an amount equal to two times the sum of his base salary and an amount equal to the aggregate incentive compensation paid to him for the two most recently completed seasons (i.e., fall and spring) prior to the date of such termination payablethe $3 Hurdle was actually achieved, Mr. Muto will become vested in installments for a period of 24 months following the date of termination.

In the event that Mr. Jaffe incurred a Qualifying Termination (whether prior to, upon or during the 24 months following a change in control or in the absence of a change in control), under the Old Employment Agreement, Mr. Jaffe and his covered dependents were entitled to receive, subject to his timely election of COBRA, continued participation in the Company’s health and medical insurance plans at the active employee premium rate through the earlierportion of the period of Mr. Jaffe’s and/or his covered dependents eligibility for COBRAperformance-based RSUs and Mr. Jaffe becoming eligible under the health and medical insurance coverage of a subsequent employer.

In the event that Mr. Jaffe incurred a Qualifying Termination, or his employment terminated by reason of his death or total disability at any time (whether prior to, upon or during the 24 months following a change in control or in the absence of a change in control), under the Old Employment Agreement, Mr. Jaffe (or his designated beneficiary or his estate, as applicable) was entitled to receive a pro rata portion of his incentive compensation for the season in which his employment is terminatedperformance-based stock options based on actual results.


LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.554820172019 Proxy Statement


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, EMPLOYMENT LETTERS AND RETIREMENT AGREEMENTS

The Old Employment Agreement provided that


linear interpolation between the closing price of the Company’s common stock for athe 20-consecutive trading day period of one year following his death, Mr. Jaffe’s base salary would continue to be paid to his designated beneficiary or his estate and his covered dependents will be eligible to continued health and medical coverage under COBRA atimmediately preceding the active employee rate. The Old Employment Agreement further provided that in the eventdate of Mr. Jaffe’sMuto’s termination by reason(the “Muto Termination Date Price”) and the Hurdles between which the Muto Termination Date Price falls. If Mr. Muto has a Change in Control Related Termination within 90 days prior to a change in control, and on or prior to the date that the change in control is consummated the $3 Hurdle is achieved, the cash payment Mr. Muto is entitled to receive pursuant to the Executive Severance Plan (as in effect on June 1, 2017) will include payment in respect of his total disability, he would receive continued paymenta portion of his base salarythe performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options based on linear interpolation between the closing price of the Company’s common stock for the longer20-consecutive trading day period immediately preceding the change in control (the “CIC Closing Date Price”) and the Hurdles between which the CIC Closing Date Price falls.

Long-term incentive awards granted to Mr. Muto in September 2017 in connection with his promotion to CEO-ascena brands are subject to the following terms:

Mr. Muto’s received a one-time grant of 1,000,000 RSUs (“One-Time RSU Grant”) in September 2017, 50% of which vested on June 30, 2019 and the remaining 50% of which will vest on June 30, 2020, subject to Mr. Muto’s continued service;
Mr. Muto was entitled to receive an annual long-term incentive grant effective in or about September 2017 having an estimated total value of $2.5 million, which consisted of awards that vest in equal installments over a three-year period (“2017 Time-Based Awards”) and awards that vest on the third anniversary of the period fromgrant date subject to achievement of applicable performance goals (“2017 Performance-Based Awards”). In September 2017, Mr. Muto received a 2017 Time-Based Award consisting of 360,825 stock options, which vests in equal installments on the first and second anniversaries of grant and 2017 Performance-Based Awards consisting of a FY20 LTIP award with a grant date fair value of $1,075,000 subject to a 1-year net income goal and a 2-year post-performance vesting condition and a FY20LTIP award with a grant date fair value of $1,075,000 subject to a 3-year relative TSR goal.
If, prior to a change in control, the Company terminates Mr. Muto’s employment without “cause” or Mr. Muto resigns for “good reason,” (i) the next tranche of any unvested 2017 Time-Based Award and One-Time RSU Grant that is scheduled to vest after the date of termination through the employment agreement termination date and one year fromwill vest on the date of such termination and he(ii) a pro-rata portion of any then outstanding unvested 2017 Performance-Based Awards will vest subject to actual achievement of the applicable performance goals determined after the end of the performance period.

Mr. Muto is subject to one-year non-competition and his covered dependents would receive continued healthtwo-year non-solicitation restrictions, as well as confidentiality and medical coverage under COBRA atnon-disclosure obligations.

Mr. Muto will continue to be a participant in the active employee rate throughCompany’s Executive Severance Plan, on the earlier of such period, the period of Mr. Jaffe’s and/or his covered dependents eligibility for COBRA and Mr. Jaffe becoming eligibleterms described below under the health and medical insurance coverage of a subsequent employer.

The terms “cause”, “good reason”, “change in control” and “total disability” are defined inheading “Executive Severance Plan,” as modified by the Old Employment Agreement and below. Severance amounts payable under the Old Employment Agreement, except for amounts payable upon Mr. Jaffe’s death, would be subject to a possiblesix-month delay pursuant to Section 409A of the Code. Muto Offer Letter.


For further information regarding Mr. Jaffe’sMuto’s employment agreementarrangements and the payments to which he may be entitled thereunder, see below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control — David Jaffe.- Gary Muto.

The Old Employment Agreement provided that if Mr. Jaffe receives parachute payments that exceed his threshold amount under Section 280G

Carrie W. Teffner
Effective May 1, 2019, the Company entered into an employment letter with Carrie W. Teffner in connection with her appointment as Interim Executive Chair of the Code,Board (the “Teffner Offer Letter”).

Pursuant to the amount will becut-backTeffner Offer Letter, Ms. Teffner receives a base salary at the annualized rate of $1,000,000 and is eligible to below the 280G threshold amount unless he would be better off receiving the full amount and paying the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code. The Old Employment Agreement also containsnon-competition andnon-solicitation restrictions effective during the employment term and for one year thereafter as well as a perpetualnon-disparagement restriction.

“Cause” is generally definedparticipate in the Old Employment Agreement to include convictionCompany’s performance-based incentive compensation program at a target level of 150% of her base salary (with a crime, intentional and willful failure to satisfactorily perform employment duties reasonably requested by our Board, fraudmaximum payout opportunity of 200% of target, or embezzlement, gross misconduct or gross negligence that has a substantial adverse effect on the Company or its affiliates, an intentional and willful act or omission which is materially detrimental to our business or reputation, or Mr. Jaffe’s willful breach of the covenants$3,000,000).


As set forth in the Old Employment Agreement (which include covenants not to compete, not to solicit our employees and not to disparageTeffner Offer Letter, Ms. Teffner received a one-time long-term incentive award of performance-based equity (the “Appointment Grant”) under the Company).

“Good Reason” is generally definedOmnibus Incentive Plan. The Appointment Grant had a grant date value of $1,050,000, with approximately 60% of the value granted in the Old Employment Agreement as the occurrence, without Mr. Jaffe’s consent,form of anyperformance-based RSUs and approximately 40% of the following: a material demotion in his position, job duties or responsibilities; our failure to pay him his compensation or benefits; the relocation of Mr. Jaffe’s principal place of work at least 35 miles from its current location; or any material breach of any of our obligations under his agreement.

“Change in Control�� is generally definedvalue granted in the Old Employment Agreement as: (a) any “person”form of performance-based stock options. Subject to Ms. Teffner’s continued employment as Interim Executive Chair of the Board or service as a member of the Board, the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options subject to the Appointment Grant are eligible to vest in accordance with the same vesting schedule that applies to Mr. Muto’s Promotion Grant, described above.


If Ms. Teffner’s employment as Interim Executive Chair of the Board ends due to the appointment of a Non-Executive Chair of the Board and Ms. Teffner continues to serve on the Board, the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options granted pursuant to the Appointment Grant will remain outstanding and eligible to vest.

If, prior to a change in control, (i) the Company terminates Ms. Teffner’s employment as Interim Executive Chair of the Board without “Cause” (as defined in the Exchange Act) becomes the beneficial owner of 30% or more of the outstanding common stock of the Company (excludingOmnibus Incentive Plan) and Ms. Teffner does not continue to serve as a person that is an affiliate of the Company); (b) a change of a majoritymember of the Board after March 5, 2014 (the “Incumbent Directors”), unlessor (ii) Ms. Teffner has a “Termination of Directorship” (as defined in the election ofOmnibus Incentive Plan) other than due to her resignation or her removal for “cause” under Delaware law, she will become vested in a new director was supported bytwo-thirdspro-rata portion of the Incumbent Directors (which includes any new director whose electionperformance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options for which the applicable Hurdle was supported bytwo-thirdsachieved prior to her termination.

In the event of Ms. Teffner’s termination as Interim Executive Chair of the Incumbent Directors); (c) the Company adoptsBoard or as a plan of liquidation of all or substantially all of its assets; (d) the Company disposes of all or substantially allmember of the assetsBoard due to her death or business of“Disability” (as defined in the Company pursuant to a merger, consolidation or other transaction; or (e) the Company combines with another company and is the surviving corporation, but, immediately after the combination, the stockholders of the Company immediatelyOmnibus Incentive Plan) prior to the combination hold, directly or indirectly, 50% or lesssecond anniversary of the common stock or other ownership interestsgrant date of the combined company.

“Total Disability” is generally defined inAppointment Grant, Ms. Teffner (or her estate or legal representative, as applicable) will receive full vesting of the Old Employment Agreement as Mr. Jaffe being physicallyperformance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options for which the applicable Hurdle was actually achieved prior to her termination due to death or mentally incapacitated such that Mr. Jaffe is incapable of performing his material duties under the Old Employment Agreement for a period of ninety (90) consecutive days or 120non-consecutive days in any12-month period. Receipt of disability benefits under the Company’s long-term disability plan or receipt of Social Security disability benefits is conclusive evidence of Total Disability, or, in the absence of receipt of such benefits, a determination of Total Disability by an impartial physician.

EMPLOYMENT LETTERS

David Jaffe

Effective as of August 1, 2017 (the “Effective Date”), Mr. Jaffe has an employment letter with the Company, which letter supersedes the Old Employment Agreement. The employment letter provides that Mr. Jaffe is an “employeeat-will” (i.e., the Company may terminate his employment at any time with or without cause, subject to any applicable severance provisions). The other terms and conditions of the

disability.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.564920172019 Proxy Statement


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, EMPLOYMENT LETTERS AND RETIREMENT AGREEMENTS



If, upon a change in control, (i) Ms. Teffner’s employment as Interim Executive Chair of the Board is terminated by the Company without Cause and Ms. Teffner does not continue to serve as a member of the Board or (ii) Ms. Teffner has a Termination of Directorship (other than due to her resignation or her removal for “cause” under Delaware law), in either case while serving on the Board after her employment as Interim Executive Chair of the Board ends due to the appointment of a Non-Executive Chair of the Board (each, a “Change in Control Termination”), and on or prior to the date of such Change in Control Termination, the $3 Hurdle was actually achieved, Ms. Teffner will become vested in a portion of the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options based on linear interpolation between the closing price of the Company’s common stock for the 20-consecutive trading day period immediately preceding the Change in Control Termination (the “Teffner Termination Date Price”) and the Hurdles between which the Teffner Termination Date Price falls.

Other than with respect to accelerated or continued vesting of the Appointment Grant as described above, Ms. Teffner is not entitled to receive cash severance or other termination payments or benefits under the Teffner Offer Letter or the Executive Severance Plan.

Ms. Teffner is subject to non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions, as well as confidentiality and non-disclosure obligations.

For further information regarding Ms. Teffner’s employment arrangements and the payments to which he may be entitled thereunder, see below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control - Carrie W. Teffner.”
Dan Lamadrid
Effective August 4, 2019, the Company entered into an employment letter with Dan Lamadrid in connection with his appointment as Executive Vice President and CFO (the “Lamadrid Offer Letter”). The Lamadrid Offer Letter supersedes Mr. Lamadrid’s August 23, 2017, employment offer letter with the Company.

Pursuant to the Lamadrid Offer Letter, Mr. Lamadrid receives a base salary of $600,000 per year and is eligible to participate in the Company’s performance-based incentive compensation program at a target level of 75% of Mr. Lamadrid’s base salary (with a maximum payout opportunity of 200% of target, or $900,000).

Pursuant to the Lamadrid Offer Letter, on October 2, 2019, Mr. Lamadrid received a grant of 100,000 time-vesting stock options (the “Time-Based Options”) and a grant of 50,000 performance-vesting stock options (the “Performance-Based Options”). Subject to Mr. Lamadrid’s continued employment, the Time-Based Options will vest in equal installments on the first and second anniversaries of the grant date. Subject to Mr. Lamadrid’s continued employment, the Performance-Based Options are substantiallyeligible to vest in accordance with the same as thosevesting terms that apply to Mr. Muto’s Promotion Grant.

If a Hurdle is actually achieved prior to the second anniversary of the Old Employment Agreement, exceptgrant date of the Performance-Based Options, the portion of the Performance-Based Options related to the Hurdle that was achieved prior to the second anniversary will vest on the second anniversary, subject to Mr. Lamadrid’s continued employment. Any portion of the Performance-Based Options related to a Hurdle that is not actually achieved by the third anniversary of the grant date will be forfeited for no consideration.

If Mr. Lamadrid’s employment is terminated by the Company without “Cause” (as defined in the Lamadrid Offer Letter) prior to a change in control of the Company, he will become vested in a pro-rata portion of the Performance-Based Options for which the applicable Hurdle was achieved prior to his termination.

If Mr. Lamadrid’s employment with the Company terminates due to his death or disability prior to the second anniversary of the grant date of the Performance-Based Options, Mr. Lamadrid (or his estate or legal representative, as applicable) will receive full vesting of the Performance-Based Options for which the applicable Hurdle was actually achieved prior to his termination due to death or disability.

If Mr. Lamadrid has a Change in Control Related Termination on or within 24 months following a change in control, and on or prior to the date of such termination the $3 Hurdle was actually achieved, Mr. Lamadrid will become vested in a portion of the Performance-Based Options based on linear interpolation between the closing price of the Company’s common stock for the following material amendments,20-consecutive trading day period immediately preceding the date of Mr. Lamadrid’s termination (the “Lamadrid Termination Date Price”) and the Hurdles between which the Lamadrid Termination Date Price falls. If Mr. Lamadrid has a Change in Control Related Termination within 90 days prior to a change in control, and on or prior to the date that the change in control is consummated the $3 Hurdle is achieved, the cash payment Mr. Lamadrid is entitled to receive pursuant to the Executive Severance Plan will include payment in respect of a portion of the Performance-Based Options based on linear interpolation between the closing price of the Company’s common stock for the 20-consecutive trading day period immediately preceding the change in control (the “CIC Closing Date Price”) and the Hurdles between which the CIC Closing Date Price falls.

The long-term incentive awards granted to Mr. Lamadrid prior to August 4, 2019, remain outstanding and are eligible to vest in accordance with their terms.

Mr. Lamadrid is subject to non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions, as well as confidentiality and non-disclosure obligations.

In addition to the Lamadrid Offer Letter, the Company and Mr. Lamadrid entered into a retention letter dated as of May 1, 2019 (the “Retention Letter”). Under the Retention Letter, subject to Mr. Lamadrid’s continued employment through August 31, 2020, he will

Ascena Retail Group, Inc.572019 Proxy Statement


receive a lump sum payment of $275,000. Pursuant to the Retention Letter, Mr. Lamadrid received a lump sum payment of $275,000 in May 2019.

Mr. Lamadrid will continue to be a participant in the Executive Severance Plan, subject to the terms and conditions of the Executive Severance Plan, with certain modifications as set forth in the Retention Letter, which are generally designeddescribed below under the heading “Executive Severance Plan.”

For further information regarding Mr. Lamadrid’s employment arrangements and the payments to conformwhich he may be entitled thereunder, see below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control - Dan Lamadrid.”
Wendy Hufford
Effective October 1, 2018, the Company entered into an employment letter with Wendy Hufford in connection with her appointment as General Counsel (the “Hufford Offer Letter”).

Pursuant to similar provisions containedthe Hufford Offer Letter, Ms. Hufford receives a base salary of $400,000 and is eligible to participate in the Company’s seasonal performance-based incentive compensation program at a target level of 60% of Ms. Hufford’s base salary (with a maximum payout opportunity of 200% of target). Pursuant to the Hufford Offer Letter, Ms. Hufford received a one-time cash sign on bonus of $100,000. In addition, Ms. Hufford’s incentive bonuses for the fall and spring seasons of the Company’s 2019 fiscal year were guaranteed at target.

Pursuant to the Hufford Offer Letter, Ms. Hufford’s Incentive Plan, with a target opportunity of 76% of base salary which may be comprised of a combination of stock options, RSUs and/or cash LTIP. The Hufford Offer Letter provides that Ms. Hufford’s Long Term Incentive Plan Award from the October 2018 Board meeting will be granted as 60% in Cash LTIP vesting after a three-year performance period, 20% stock options vesting 50% each year, and 20% RSUs vesting 50% each year.

Ms. Hufford is subject to non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions, as well as confidentiality and non-disclosure obligations.

Ms. Hufford is eligible to participate in the Company’s Executive Severance Plan:

Mr. Jaffe may terminate his employment for “Good Reason” only if he provides noticePlan, subject to the Company setting forth in reasonable detailterms and conditions of the alleged “Good Reason” circumstances or event within 30 days after the occurrence of such event or circumstancesExecutive Severance Plan.

For further information regarding Ms. Hufford’s employment arrangements and the Company failspayments to cure such event or circumstances within 60 days after receipt of such notice;

Mr. Jaffe willwhich she may be entitled to changethereunder, see below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in control severance payments if the qualifying termination event occurs during the90-day period prior to the change in control;Control - Wendy Hufford.”

In the event Mr. Jaffe incurs a qualifying termination entitling him to change in control severance, any stock-based awards not vested immediately prior to the change in control that are outstanding on the change in control date (or outstanding immediately prior to the change in control date for awards not assumed or replaced by the successor) will be deemed vested on the termination date. If the qualifying termination occurs during the90-day period before the change in control, any unvested awards that expired on the date of the termination will be deemed vested and entitled to payment at fair market value;

The “Bonus” component of Mr. Jaffe’s change in control severance will be determined based on Mr. Jaffe’s annual target cash performance bonus opportunity for the fiscal year in which the change in control occurs or, if greater, Mr. Jaffe’s average three-year aggregate annual cash performance bonuses actually paid to him on a semi-annual basis; and

No severance will be payable to Mr. Jaffe unless he executes and does not revoke within 60 days of termination a general release of claims in favor of the Company and its affiliates.

Robb Giammatteo

Mr. Giammatteo hashad an employment letter with the Company that was entered into on July 25, 2015, which providesprovided that he is entitled towould receive a base salary of at least $500,000 per year, as well as standard Company benefits.

Brian Lynch

The Company and Mr. Lynch has an employment letter with the Company that wasGiammatteo entered into on June 12, 2017 (effectivea retention letter dated as of AugustMay 1, 2017), in connection with his promotion. The material terms of the employment letter are summarized below.

2019, pursuant to which Mr. Lynch willGiammatteo was eligible to receive an annual base salaryaggregate retention bonus of $1,000,000, and will be considered for an annual performance evaluation beginning in$700,000 subject to his continued employment. Mr. Giammatteo forfeited the fall of 2018. retention bonus upon his departure from the Company.

Mr. Lynch will continue to beGiammatteo was also eligible to participate in the Company’s seasonal performance-based incentive compensation programExecutive Severance Plan, subject to the terms and beginningconditions of the Executive Severance Plan, with certain modifications as set forth in Mr. Giammatteo’s retention letter, which are described below under the heading “Executive Severance Plan.”
SEPARATION AGREEMENTS
David Jaffe
Effective May 1, 2019, the Company entered into a transition and separation agreement and general release with David Jaffe in connection with his retirement, pursuant to which Mr. Jaffe is entitled to receive severance payments and other benefits in accordance with the Fiscal Year 2018 Fall Season, will have an increased target levelterms of his employment offer letter dated as of July 29, 2017, consisting of the following payments and benefits:

continued payment of Mr. Jaffe’s base salary for a period of 24 months following termination, totaling $2,000,000;

Company-paid COBRA continuation coverage for up to 18 months, subject to his continued payment of premiums at the applicable active rate, plus a payment of $2,000 per month from the Company; and

a lump sum payment equal to 125%the Spring season short-term incentive award Mr. Jaffe would be entitled to receive, based on actual performance and pro-rated for the portion of annual base salary,the Spring season that Mr. Jaffe was employed (the amount of such payment was $0 based on actual performance for the Spring season).

In addition, as of June 27, 2019, Mr. Jaffe satisfied the “Total Years Test” with respect to any then outstanding stock options and RSUs granted to him under the Omnibus Incentive Plan (and any predecessor plan). As a maximum annual payout at two timesresult of Mr. Jaffe’s continued service as a senior advisor through June 28, 2019, and satisfying the target level.

UnderTotal Years Test, Mr. Jaffe’s outstanding stock options continued to vest in accordance with their terms and all of Mr. Jaffe’s outstanding RSUs became immediately vested (the value of the employment letter,RSUs that became

Ascena Retail Group, Inc.582019 Proxy Statement


vested in connection with Mr. Jaffe satisfying the Total Years Test was $31,549, based on the closing price of our common stock on June 28, 2019, which was $0.61).

Mr. Jaffe is subject to Compensation Committee approval,post-employment non-competition and employee non-solicitation restrictions.

Brian Lynch
Effective May 1, 2019, the Company entered into a separation agreement and general release with Brian Lynch in connection with his departure from the Company, pursuant to which Mr. Lynch will continue to be eligible towould receive annual equity grants effective September 2017 inseverance benefits under the form of stock options, RSUs or performance-based awards,Executive Severance Plan and will have a target level equal to 250% of annual base salary.

TheMr. Lynch’s April 5, 2019, employment letter provided for an additionalone-time grant of 1,000,000 restricted stock units effective September 2017 that will vest 50% on June 30, 2019 and the remaining 50% will vest on June 30, 2020, in each case, subject to continued employment through each applicable vesting date.

John Pershing

Mr. Pershing has an employmentoffer letter with the Company that was entered into on January 25, 2015, which provides that heCompany. Under such separation agreement, Mr. Lynch is entitled to areceive the following payments and benefits:


an amount equal to 52 weeks of his current base salary of at least $525,000 per year, as well as standard Company benefits.

Duane D. Holloway

Mr. Holloway has an employment letter$1,000,000, paid in installments in accordance with the Company’s payroll practices;


Company-paid COBRA continuation coverage for up to 12 months, less the active employee rate for Mr. Lynch and his eligible dependents;

up to 12 months of executive outplacement services at a cost to the Company that was entered into on July 31, 2016, which provides that he isnot to exceed $7,300;

a lump sum payment equal to the Spring season short-term incentive award Mr. Lynch would be entitled to receive, based on actual performance and pro-rated for the portion of the Spring season Mr. Lynch was employed (the amount of such payment was $0 based on actual performance for the Spring season); and

a lump sum payment of $416,666, which represents Mr. Lynch’s base salary for the period from May 2, 2019, through September 30, 2019.

Mr. Lynch is subject to post-employment non-competition and employee and customer non-solicitation restrictions. In connection with Mr. Lynch’s separation, he forfeited all of at least $440,000 per year, as well as standard Company benefits.

his outstanding RSUs, stock options and LTIP awards.


RETIREMENT AGREEMENTS


Elliot S. Jaffe

Commencing July 30, 2006, Elliot S. Jaffe became eligible to receive a supplemental retirement benefit of $150,000 per year for life, subject to an annualcost-of-living increase. On October 19, 2016, Mr. Elliot S. Jaffe, notifiedEffective at the Companyend of his intention not to stand forre-election at the

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.502017 Proxy Statement


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, EMPLOYMENT LETTERS AND RETIREMENT AGREEMENTS

2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and to retireMr. Elliot S. Jaffe retired as an officer of the Company and from the Board, effective at the end of the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Board.


Mrs. Roslyn S. Jaffe

We also entered into a retirement agreement with Mrs. Jaffe. The agreement provides Mrs. Jaffe, in light of her role asco-founder of the Company and her 44 years of service to the Company at the time of her retirement, with a supplemental retirement benefit, commencing July 30, 2006, of $50,000 per year for life, subject to an annualcost-of-living increase.



LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.595120172019 Proxy Statement



EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN



We maintain the Executive Severance Plan, as amended and restated as of June 8, 2017,12, 2018, in order to provide severance benefits to certain key employees, which for fiscal 2017,2019, included all of our currently-employed NEOs (other than our CEO). In the case of Mr. Muto, he is entitled to participate in the Executive Severance Plan subject to the terms and conditions of the Executive Severance Plan as in effect from June 1, 2017. The following summary describes the key provisions of the Executive Severance Plan as they would have applied to our currently-employed NEOs (other than our CEO) at the end of fiscal 2017.

2019.

The Executive Severance Plan provides participants with the following severance benefits in the event of a termination of employment by the Company without “cause” (as defined in the plan), other than a termination that constitutes a termination in connection with a “change in control” (as defined in the plan):

12-month salary continuation; and

a pro ratapro-rata portion of his/her semi-annual bonus based on actual results; and

continued health insurance coverage at the active employee rate for a period up to 12 months; and

12 months of Outplacement Services not to exceed $10,000.$7,300 (or, in the case of Mr. Muto, $10,000).

In the case of Mr. Muto, he would entitled to the severance benefits described above in the event his employment is terminated without “cause” or for “good reason” (as described below), except that he would receive 24 months (and not 12 months) of salary continuation payments. In the case of Mr. Lamadrid and Mr. Giammatteo, each would be entitled to the severance benefits described above in the event his employment is terminated without “cause,” except that each would receive 24 months (and not 12 months) of salary continuation payments. Ms. Teffner is not eligible for severance payments or benefits under the Executive Severance Plan.
In lieu of the benefits described above, if such executiveour currently-employed NEOs (other than Ms. Teffner) would have been terminated without cause or terminated employment for “good reason” (as described below) during (1) the 90 day period prior to a change in control (such termination, a“Pre-CIC “Pre-CIC Termination”), or (2) the period commencing on a Change in Control and ending 24 months later (such termination, a“Post-CIC “Post-CIC Termination), the executive would have been eligible for the following upon the change in control (in the case of aPre-CIC Termination), or upon the termination date (in the case of aPost-CIC Termination):

a lump sum equal to 1.5 times (or 2 times, in the case of Messrs. Muto, Lamadrid and Giammatteo) the sum of annual base salary and the greater of a) annual target bonus for the year in which the CIC occurs; or b) average three-year aggregate annual bonus equaling the sum of the two seasonal bonuses paid in each such fiscal year; and

a pro ratapro-rata portion (based on the number of days employed during the applicable performance period from when the separation from service occurs) of the seasonal (semi-annual) bonus based on actual results, payable when other such bonuses are paid; and

continued health insurance coverage at the active employee rate for a period of up to 18 months; and

in the case of aPost-CIC Termination, full vesting of any unvested equity awards (in the case of aPre-CIC Termination, a lump sum cash equivalent payment equal to the fair market value of the unvested equity awards that were forfeited upon the termination); and

12 months of Outplacement Services not to exceed $10,000.$7,300 (or, in the case of Mr. Muto, $10,000).

Under the Executive Severance Plan, “cause” generally means the occurrence of any of the following: (i) conviction of (including a plea of nolo contendere to a felony or other crime involving fraud, dishonesty or moral turpitude; (ii) failure to satisfactorily perform duties; (iii) fraud, embezzlement or dishonesty; (iv) gross misconduct or gross negligence in connection with the Company’s business that has an adverse effect on the Company’s business; or (v) an intentional or willful act or omission that is detrimental to the Company’s business or reputation.
Under the Executive Severance Plan, “good reason” generally means the occurrence of any of the following: (i) any material diminution of responsibilities, duties or authority, (ii) any reduction in base salary and/or benefits, other than a reduction that is uniformly applied to similarly situated employees of not more than 10%, (iii) relocation of the principal place of work outside of a 30-mile radius of the then current work location, or (iv) the failure of a successor to the Company to assume the Severance Plan. With respect to Mr. Muto, under the Muto Offer Letter, “good reason” also includes (A) any material breach of the Muto Offer Letter by the Company or the Company’s failure to pay compensation and benefits in accordance with the Muto Offer Letter, and (B) prior to a change in control, any reduction in base salary and/or benefits, other than a reduction that is uniformly applied to similarly situated employees of not more than 10%.
The severance benefits payable under the Severance Plan are subject to: (1) the six month delay to the extent required under Section 409A of the Code; (2) the execution andnon-revocation of a general release of claims in favor of the Company within a specified time period; (3) the executive’s compliance with certainnon-competition andnon-solicitation restrictive covenants following a termination (other than aPre-CIC Termination or aPost-CIC Termination); and (4) reduction to avoid any excise tax on “parachute payments” if the executive would benefit from such reduction as compared to paying the excise tax. Any benefits payable under the Executive Severance Plan supersede and are in lieu of any severance benefits and/or payments provided under any other agreements, arrangements or severance plans by and between the executive and the Company.


LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.605220172019 Proxy Statement




NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION IN FISCAL 2017

2019


After satisfying a waiting period, our NEOs are eligible for participation in our Executive Retirement Plan, which is an unfunded, unsecured nonqualifiednon-qualified deferred compensation plan. The Executive Retirement Plan allows our executives to defer a maximum of 50% of their base salary and 75% of their bonuses paid or other performance-based cash compensation awarded. Elections to participate in the Executive Retirement Plan are made by our executives on an annual basis, prior to the beginning of the year in which the compensation is earned.


We make Company contributions to the Executive Retirement Plan in an amount determined by us for each plan year. For fiscal 2017, our2019, NEOs who were eligible for participationto participate in the Executive Retirement Plan and ascena 401(k) Savings Plan received a Company matching contribution of 1% of up to $265,000$275,000 of total compensation deferred and Company matching contribution of 5% of compensation over $265,000 deferred. $275,000 deferred through December 31, 2018.  Beginning on January 1, 2019, NEOs received a Company matching contribution of 1% up to $280,000 of total compensation deferred and Company matching contribution of 5% over $280,000. For fiscal 2019, NEO who were eligible to participate in the Executive Retirement Plan but had not yet met eligibility to participate in the ascena 401(k) Savings Plan received a Company matching contribution on the first 5% of compensation deferred into the Plan.

Participants are immediately vested in deferrals of their own compensation. Company matching contributions vest in 25% increments after 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years of service with the Company. All Company matching contributions held and received by the participant are vested after five years of service with the Company.


The aggregate balance of each participant’s account consists of amounts that have been deferred by the participant, Company matching contributions, plus earnings (or minus losses). We do not deposit any amounts into any trust or other account for the benefit of plan participants. In accordance with tax requirements, the assets of the Executive Retirement Plan are subject to claims of our creditors. Account balances are deemed invested in accordance with investment elections designated by the participant. Investment option transfers may be made daily. There are 27 investment options available to plan participants, including fixed income funds, domestic and international equity funds, blended funds andpre-allocated lifestyle fund investments. Interest and gains or losses on each deemed investment are credited or debited to each participant’s account daily based on the actual performance of the funds in which the participant is deemed invested.


Deferred account balances are distributed to the plan participants in accordance with elections made by the participant at the time the deferral is made, subject to Section 409A of the Code. A participant may elect to receive distributions, either in a lump sum or in installments, upon his or her termination of employment with the Company, disability, death, an unforeseeable emergency or a change of control, each of the last two events as defined in Section 409A of the Code. A participant may elect to receive distributions while still employed by the Company if he or she elects to havein-service or education distributions, made at a date specified by the participants.

The following table shows the executive and Company contributions, earnings and account balances for the NEOs.

  Name  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
(1)
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
(2)
   Aggregate (Loss)
Earnings in Last FY
($)
(3)
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
   Aggregate
Balance at
Last Fiscal
Year End
 

David Jaffe

   69,058    89,762    2,818,987    0    21,620,530 

Robb Giammatteo

   29,808    20,661    24,215    0    209,043 

Brian Lynch

   87,412    96,790    37,895    0    329,883 

John Pershing

   29,126    27,154    22,244    -120,067    242,425 

Duane D. Holloway

   0    0    0    0    0 

Name
Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year End
($)
(1)
Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year End
($)
(2)
Aggregate (Loss) Earnings in Last  Fiscal Year End
($)
(3)
Aggregate Withdrawals/Distributions
($)
 
Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End
($)
Gary Muto60,00015,137369,376
Dan Lamadrid(4)
26,01099327,003
David Jaffe61,240333,60824,966,381
Robert Giammatteo17,42421,566309,836
Brian Lynch69,65551,111580,060

(1)All executive contributions represent amounts deferred by each NEO under the Executive Retirement Plan (Ascena’sNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan) and are included as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table under “Salary”, “Bonus” and“Non-Equity “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”

(2)All registrant contributions are reported under “All Other Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table.

(3)These amounts are not reported in the Summary Compensation Table as the earnings included in this column are based on the investment options selected by the NEO, none of which provide interest above the market rate.

(4)Mr. Lamadrid did not meet 401(k) eligibility until 10/1/18 so he contributed up until 12/31/19.


LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.615320172019 Proxy Statement




POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL


The tables below describe and estimate additional compensation and benefits that our NEOs would become entitled to pursuant to their employment agreements, employment letters and other arrangements between the Company and the executive upon a termination of their employment in certain circumstances or in the event of a Change in Control, in each case assuming such event had occurred on July 29, 2017.August 3, 2019. Where applicable, the amounts payable assume a $2.32$0.33 fair value of our common stock (the closing price on July 28, 2017,August 2, 2019, the last trading day of fiscal 2017)2019). We have calculated these estimated payments to meet SEC disclosure requirements. The estimated payments are not necessarily indicative of the actual amounts any of our NEOs would receive in such circumstances.

The calculation excludes:

Pcompensation amounts accrued through July 29, 2017August 3, 2019 that would be paid in the normal course of continued employment, such as accrued but unpaid salary, and

Pvested account balances under our retirement plan that are generally available to all our salaried employees.

In addition, where applicable, the amounts reflected for bonuses reflect the actual amounts paid to the NEO for fiscal 2017,2019, since the hypothetical termination or Change in Control date is the last day of the fiscal year for which the bonus is to be determined.

In addition to these payments, participants in our Executive Retirement Plan, including the NEOs, may elect to receive distributions, either in a lump sum or in installments, upon his or her termination of employment with the Company, disability, death, or following a Change in Control (subject to Section 409A of the Code). Each NEO’s account balance under the Executive Retirement Plan as of the end of fiscal 20172018 is set forth under the “Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End” column of the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table above.


Payments and Benefits for Mr. David Jaffe

  Provision  

Base
Salary

($)

  Bonus
($)
  Health
Benefits
($)
  Acceleration of
Equity Awards
($)
(6)
   Total
($)
 

Termination without Cause or for Good Reason Prior to a Change in Control

   2,000,000(1)   0(4)   32,230(7)   0    2,032,230 

Termination without Cause or for Good Reason Upon or Following a Change in Control

   2,000,000(2)   0(4)(5)   32,230(7)   1,584,307    3,616,537 

Change in Control — No Termination

            1,584,307    1,584,307 

Death

   1,000,000(3)   0(4)(5)   21,487(8)   1,584,307    2,605,794 

Total Disability

   2,000,000(1)   0(4)(5)   32,230(7)   1,584,307    3,616,537 

Termination for Cause or without Good Reason Prior to a Change in Control

                 

Gary Muto
Provision
Base
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
(3)
Health
Benefits
($)
Outplacement($)
Acceleration
of Equity
Awards
($)
(6)
Total
($)
 
Termination without Cause or for Good Reason Prior to a Change in Control
2,000,000(1) 
0(3)
12,351(4) 
10,000
165,000(6)
2,187,351
Termination without Cause or for Good Reason Upon or Following a Change in Control
5,000,000(2)
0(3)
18,526(5)
10,000
215,784(7)
5,244,310
Change in Control — No Termination
215,784(7)
215,784
Death or Total Disability
215,784(7)
215,784
Termination for Cause

(1)Represents an amount equal to 2 times hisMr. Muto’s base salary.salary paid as salary continuation.

(2)Represents an amount equal to 2 times the sum of his base salary and most recent fiscal year bonus paid (aggregate of both season’s bonuses). Going forward for fiscal 2018, it is a 2x multiple of the sum of base salary and the higher of (aggregate bonus paid or target bonus).

(3)Represents an amount equal to his base salary.

(4)Represents the amount of his FY17 Cash-Settled LTIP for fiscal 2017, if applicable.

(5)Represents an amount equal to the aggregate cash incentive compensation paid for the two most recently completed seasons prior to the date of termination.

(6)Represents the fair market value of our common stock on July 28, 2017, less the exercise price, if applicable, multiplied by the number of shares of our common stock underlying all equity awards held by him on such date that would have become vested and exercisable or for which the restrictions thereon would have lapsed had such event occurred on such date.

(7)Represents our payment for the cost of continuation health coverage for his family for 18 months following his termination.

(8)Represents our payment for the cost of continuation health coverage for his family for 12 months following his termination.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.542017 Proxy Statement


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

Payments and Benefits for Mr. Robb Giammatteo

  Provision  Base
Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
(3)
   Health
Benefits
($)
  Acceleration
of Equity
Awards
($)
(6)
   Total
($)
 

Termination without Cause or for Good Reason Prior to a Change in Control

   500,000(1)   0    21,487(4)   0    521,487 

Termination for Cause or for Good Reason Upon or Following a Change in Control

   1,312,500(2)   0    32,230(5)   140,617    1,485,347 

Change in Control — No Termination

   0   0    0   140,617    140,617 

Death or Disability

   0   0    0   140,617    140,617 

Termination for Cause

   0   0    0   0    0 

(1)Represents an amount equal to his base salary.

(2)Represents an amount equal to 1.5 times the sum of hisMr. Muto’s base salary and his fiscal 20172019 target bonus paid as lump sum.

(3)Represents the amounta pro-rata portion of his FY17 Cash-Settled LTIP for fiscal 2017.Mr. Muto’s spring season semi-annual bonus based on actual results.

(4)Represents our payment for the cost of continuation health coverage for 12 months following his termination

(5)Represents our payment for the cost of continuation health coverage for 18 months following his termination

(6)Represents the fair market value of our common stock on July 28, 2017, less the exercise price, if applicable, multiplied by the number of shares of our common stock underlying all equity awards held by him on such date that would have become vested and exercisable or for which the restrictions thereon would have lapsed had such event occurred on such date.

Payments and Benefits for Mr. Brian Lynch

  Provision  Base
Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
(3)
   Health
Benefits
($)
  Acceleration
of Equity
Awards
($)
(6)
   Total
($)
 

Termination without Cause or for Good Reason Prior to a Change in Control

   950,000(1)   0    21,958(4)   0    971,958 

Termination for Cause or for Good Reason Upon or Following a Change in Control

   2,992,500(2)   0    32,937(5)   209,069    3,234,506 

Change in Control — No Termination

   0   0    0   209,069    209,069 

Death or Disability

   0   0    0   209,069    209,069 

Termination for Cause

   0   0    0   0    0 

(1)Represents an amount equal to his base salary.

(2)Represents an amount equal to 1.5 times the sum of his base salary and his fiscal 2017 target bonus

(3)Represents the amount of his FY17 Cash-Settled LTIP for fiscal 2017.

(4)Represents our payment for the cost of continuation health coverage for 12 months following his termination.

(5)Represents our payment for the cost of continuation health coverage for 18 months following his termination.

(6)Represents the vesting of the next tranche of RSUs granted to Mr. Muto in respect of his 2017 Time-Vested Awards that are outstanding and unvested at the end of the 2019 fiscal year. No value is attributed to the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options granted to Mr. Muto pursuant to his Promotion Grant because the $3 Hurdle was not actually achieved as of the end of fiscal 2019.
(7)Represents the vesting of the next tranche of RSUs granted to Mr. Muto in respect of 2017 Time-Vested Awards that are outstanding and unvested at the end of fiscal 2019, as well as the vesting of the remaining time-vested RSUs granted to Mr. Muto that were outstanding at the end of fiscal 2019. No value is attributed to the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options granted to Mr. Muto pursuant to his Promotion Grant because the $3 Hurdle was not actually achieved as of the end of fiscal 2019. No value is attributed to the FY17 LTIP awards granted to Mr. Muto because the metrics were not achieved.



Ascena Retail Group, Inc.622019 Proxy Statement



Payments and Benefits for Ms. Teffner
Provision
Base
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Health Benefits
($)
Outplacement
($)
Acceleration of Equity Awards ($)
Total
($)
Termination without Cause Prior to a Change in Control
Termination without Cause or for Good Reason Upon or Following a Change in Control
Change in Control — No Termination
7,966(1)
7,966
Death or Disability
7,966(1)
7,966
Termination for Cause

(1)Represents the fair market value of our common stock on July 28, 2017, less the exercise price, if applicable,August 2, 2019, multiplied by the number of shares of our common stock underlying all equity awardsunvested time-vesting RSUs held by himMs. Teffner on such datethe last day of the fiscal year that would have become vested and exercisable or for which the restrictions thereon would have lapsed had such event occurred on such date. Such RSUs were granted to Ms. Teffner in October 2018 in respect of her service as a non-employee director in fiscal 2019 prior to her appointment as Interim Executive Chair of the Board. No value is attributed to the performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options granted to Ms. Teffner pursuant to her Appointment Grant because the $3 Hurdle was not actually achieved as of the end of fiscal 2019.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.552017 Proxy Statement


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

Payments and Benefits for Mr. John Pershing

  Provision  Base
Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
(3)
   Health
Benefits
($)
  Acceleration
of Equity
Awards
($)
(6)
   Total
($)
 

 

Termination without Cause or for Good Reason Prior to a Change in Control

  

 

 

 

551,250

 

(1) 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

  

 

 

 

14,265

 

(4) 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

  

 

 

 

565,515

 

 

 

Termination for Cause or for Good Reason Upon or Following a Change in Control

   1,447,031(2)   0    21,398(5)   330,669    1,799,098 

 

Change in Control — No Termination

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

330,669

 

 

  

 

 

 

330,669

 

 

Death or Disability

 

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

330,669

 

 

  

 

 

 

330,669

 

 

 

Termination for Cause

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

Lamadrid
Provision 
Base
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Health Benefits
($)
Outplacement
($)
Acceleration of Equity Awards ($)
Total
($)
Termination without Cause Prior to a Change in Control
850,000(1)
0(2)
15,095(3)
7,300872,395
Termination without Cause or for Good Reason Upon or Following a Change in Control
1,105,000(4)
0(2)
22,643(5)
7,300
7,348(6)
1,142,291
Change in Control — No Termination
7,348(6)
7,348
Death or Disability
7,348(6)
7,348
Termination for Cause

(1)Represents an amount equal to his2 times Mr. Lamadrid’s base salary.salary paid as salary continuation.

(2)Represents an amount equal to 1.5 times the suma pro-rata portion of his base salary and his fiscal 2017 target bonus.semi-annual bonus based on actual results.

(3)Represents the amount of his FY17 Cash-Settled LTIP for fiscal 2017.

(4)(3)Represents our payment for the cost of continuation health coverage for 12 months following his termination.

(4)Represents an amount equal to 2 times the sum of Mr. Lamadrid’s base salary and his fiscal 2019 target bonus paid as lump sum.
(5)Represents our payment for the cost of continuation coverage for 18 months following his termination.
(6)Represents the fair market value of our common stock on August 2, 2019, multiplied by the number of unvested RSUs held by Mr. Lamadrid on the last day of the fiscal year that would have become vested had such event occurred on such date.






Ascena Retail Group, Inc.632019 Proxy Statement



Payments and Benefits for Ms. Hufford
Provision
Base
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Health Benefits
($)
Outplacement
($)
Acceleration of Equity Awards ($)
Total
($)
Termination without Cause Prior to a Change in Control
400,000(1)
120,000(2)
12,331(3)
7,300 539,631
Termination without Cause or for Good Reason Upon or Following a Change in Control
640,000(4)
120,000(2)
18,497(5)
7,300
4,531(6)
790,328
Change in Control — No Termination
4,531(6)
4,531
Death or Disability
4,531(6)
4,531
Termination for Cause

(1)Represents an amount equal to 1 times Ms. Hufford's base salary paid as salary continuation.
(2)Represents a pro-rata portion of her semi-annual bonus based on actual results.
(3)Represents our payment for the cost of continuation health coverage for 12 months following her termination.
(4)Represents our payment for the cost of continuation health coverage for 18 months following his terminationher termination.

(5)Represents an amount equal to 1 times the sum of Ms. Hufford’s base salary and her fiscal 2019 target bonus paid as a lump sum.
(6)Represents the fair market value of our common stock on July 28, 2017, less the exercise price, if applicable,August 2, 2019, multiplied by the number of shares of our common stock underlying all equity awardsunvested RSUs held by himMs. Hufford on such datethe last day of the fiscal year that would have become vested and exercisable or for which the restrictions thereon would have lapsed had such event occurred on such date.


Payments and Benefits for Mr. Duane D. Holloway

  Provision  Base
Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
(3)
   Health
Benefits
($)
  Acceleration
of Equity
Awards
($)
(6)
   Total
($)
 

 

Termination without Cause or for Good Reason Prior to a Change in Control

  

 

 

 

440,000

 

(1) 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

  

 

 

 

21,958

 

(4) 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

  

 

 

 

461,958

 

 

 

Termination for Cause or for Good Reason Upon or Following a Change in Control

  

 

 

 

1,155,000

 

(2) 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

  

 

 

 

32,937

 

(5) 

 

 

 

 

112,142

 

 

  

 

 

 

1,300,079

 

 

 

Change in Control — No Termination

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

112,142

 

 

  

 

 

 

112,142

 

 

 

Death or Disability

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

112,142

 

 

  

 

 

 

112,142

 

 

 

Termination for Cause

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

  

 

 

 

0

 

 

Giammatteo
Provision
Base
Salary
($)
Bonus ($)Health Benefits
($)
Outplacement
($)
Acceleration of Equity Awards ($)Total ($)
Termination without Cause Prior to a Change in Control
1,200,000(1)
0(2)
18,526(3)
7,3001,225,826
Termination without Cause or for Good Reason Upon or Following a Change in Control
1,650,000(4)
0(2)
18,526(3)
7,300
4,674(5)
1,680,500
Change in Control — No Termination
4,674(5)
4,674
Death or Disability
4,674(5)
4,674
Termination for Cause

(1)Represents an amount equal to his2 times Mr. Giammatteo’s base salary.salary paid as salary continuation.

(2)Represents an amount equal to 1.5 times the suma pro-rata portion of his base salary and his fiscal 2017 target bonus.semi-annual bonus based on actual results.

(3)Represents the amount of his FY17 Cash-Settled LTIP for fiscal 2017.

(4)Represents our payment for the cost of continuation health coverage for 12 months following his termination.

(5)(3)Represents our payment for the cost of continuation health coverage for 18 months following his termination.

(6)
(4)Represents an amount equal to 2 times the sum of Mr. Giammatteo’s base salary and his fiscal 2019 target bonus paid as lump sum.
(5)Represents the fair market value of our common stock on July 28, 2017, less the exercise price, if applicable,August 2, 2019, multiplied by the number of shares of our common stock underlying all equity awardsunvested RSUs held by himMr. Giammatteo on such datethe last day of the fiscal year that would have become vested and exercisable or for which the restrictions thereon would have lapsed had such event occurred on such date. Mr. Giammatteo forfeited all of his outstanding equity awards upon his departure from the Company on August 3, 2019.






Ascena Retail Group, Inc.642019 Proxy Statement



SPECIAL EQUITY PLAN PROVISIONS UNDER CHANGE IN CONTROL


Acceleration of Equity Awards

As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the headings“Non-Qualified “Non-Qualified Stock Options, RSUs and PSUs under the Company’s Omnibus Incentive Plan” and “Long-Term Incentive Plans”, eligible employees, including our NEOs, may be awarded PSUs,

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.562017 Proxy Statement


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

non-qualified stock options, shares of restricted stock or RSUs that vest over a specified period of years that vary based on the type and timing of the award (unless, in the case of restricted stock and RSUs, the shares are subject to immediate vesting because the recipient satisfies the “Total Years Test”). Prior to its amendment and restatement effective December 17, 2010, the Omnibus Incentive Plan and relevant award agreements, however, provided for accelerated vesting of certain equity awards following a Change in Control of the Company or upon certain termination events, as described below. To reflect corporate governance best practices, the provisions relating to a change of control of the Company were modified pursuant to the amendment and restatement of the Omnibus Incentive Plan for awards granted on or after December 17, 2010, as set forth below.

Change in Control Provisions under the Omnibus Incentive Plan

Effective with respect to grants made under the Omnibus Incentive Plan on or after December 17,

2010, unless otherwise determined at grant, such awards will not automatically vest upon a Change in Control (i.e., a “single trigger”), but will vest upon an involuntary termination without Cause that occurs within 2 years following a Change in Control (i.e., upon a “double trigger”). Unless otherwise determined at grant, awards granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan prior to December 17, 2010 will automatically vest upon a single trigger.

“Change in Control” is defined in the Omnibus Incentive Plan as:

Pany person or group acquires 30% or more of the Company’s voting securities;

Pa change in a majority of the members of the Board over anytwo-year (or, for any payment pursuant to an award that is triggered upon a Change in Control and that constitutes

P“non-qualified deferred compensation” pursuant to Section 409A of the Code (such an award a “409A Award”), one year) period unless the new directors’ election to the Board was approved by at leasttwo-thirds (or, for any payment pursuant to a 409A Award, a majority) of the existing directors (referred to as a “change in Board composition”);

Pa merger of the Company, unless the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior to the merger continue to represent greater than 50% of the voting securities of the company or surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger;

Papproval by the stockholders of a plan of liquidation of the Company (this will not apply with respect to any payment pursuant to a 409A Award); or

Pa sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets other than a sale to a person or persons who beneficially own, directly or indirectly, at least 50% or more of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the Company at the time of the sale (or, for awards granted prior to March 3, 2010, approval of the stockholders of such sale) (referred to as an “asset sale”).

For awards granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan prior to December 17, 2010, “Change in Control” also includes the following events:

none of Messrs. Elliot S. Jaffe or David Jaffe, Ms. Roslyn Jaffe, or any of their direct lineal descendants (referred to as the “Jaffe family”), is a member of the Board; or

the Jaffe family owns less than 5% of the voting securities of the Company.

P none of Messrs. Elliot S. Jaffe or David Jaffe, Ms. Roslyn Jaffe, or any of their direct lineal descendants (referred to as the “Jaffe family”), is a member of the Board; or
P the Jaffe family owns less than 5% of the voting securities of the Company.
Special Provisions Related to Option Awards Granted Prior to December 17, 2010

If prior to the occurrence of a Change in Control, the Compensation Committee reasonably determines, in good faith, that the stock options will be honored or assumed, or new rights substituted, then stock options granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan prior to December 17, 2010, generally, will not be subject to accelerated vesting upon a Change in Control.

If the stock options granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan are accelerated upon a Change in Control, the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may authorize the Company or its affiliates to purchase any such accelerated options by paying the option holder the difference between the exercise price of his or her option and the higher of: (i) the highest price paid for a share of common stock in any transaction related to the Change in Control, or (ii) the highest fair market value per share of common stock at any time during the60-day period preceding the Change in Control.

Special Provisions Related to LTIP Awards

Restricted stock awards granted under any completed LTIP cycle would immediately vest in the event that a Change in Control occurs or the recipient’s employment is terminated due to death or disability.


LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.655720172019 Proxy Statement


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL



Special Provisions Related to Annual or Special Awards

Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant, annual or special awards of restricted stock that have not yet vested would vest immediately upon the participant’s death, disability, achievement of the Total Years Test or a termination of the participant’s employment without Cause or for Good Reason that occurs within 24 months following a Change in Control. In addition, unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant, any portion of an award of RSUs that had not yet vested would vest immediately upon the occurrence of the participant’s death, disability, or termination on or after achievement of the Total Years Test or a Change in Control; except that, if a recipient makes a deferral election with respect to an RSU award, the foregoing accelerated vesting provisions will not apply to such award if the recipient’s termination occurs on or before the 13th month following the grant date due to achievement of the Total Years Test.



LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.665820172019 Proxy Statement




PROPOSAL TWO — APPROVAL OF THE ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2018)

GENERAL

In October 2017, the Board approved, subject to stockholder approval, the Ascena Retail Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2018) (the “Purchase Plan”). Stockholder approval of the Purchase Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares that are present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal at the meeting.

The Purchase Plan is intended to encourage and enable employees of the Company and its designated subsidiaries to acquire proprietary interests in the Company through the ownership of the Company’s common stock purchased through accumulated payroll deductions on anafter-tax basis. The Purchase Plan is also intended to be an “employee stock purchase plan” within the meaning of Code Section 423 and the provisions of the Purchase Plan will be construed in a manner consistent with the requirements of such section. Our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, are not eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan.

The principal purpose of the Purchase Plan is to approve a 4,000,000 share increase to the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the current plan. As of the date of this proxy statement, the Company had less than five (5) shares of its common stock remaining available for issuance under the current plan. Based on the past participation usage rate, the Company believes that the 4,000,000 additional authorized shares will be sufficient to operate the Purchase Plan for approximately three to five additional years, depending in part on the future performance of our common stock.

The following summary describes the principal provisions of the Purchase Plan. The summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the Purchase Plan attached as Annex A to this proxy statement.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PURCHASE PLAN

Under the Purchase Plan, as of the effective date, an aggregate of 4,000,003 shares of common stock (subject to certain adjustments to reflect changes in the Company’s capitalization) may be purchased by eligible employees that become participants in the Purchase Plan.

An employee of the Company or its designated subsidiaries who has at least one year of continuous service, customarily works more than 20 hours per week and more than five months per year and does not possess five percent or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of common stock of the Company or a subsidiary corporation, is eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan commencing on the first day of any offering under the Purchase Plan. However, to the extent allowable under Code Section 423, the Compensation and Stock Incentive Committee may determine that an offering will not be extended to one or more categories of employees. Unless otherwise modified by the Compensation Committee, none of our executive officers are eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan. As of October 13, 2017, approximately 375 employees were eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan.

The term “designated subsidiary” means each existing subsidiary and future subsidiaries and parents (if any) that are not specifically excluded from participation by the Compensation Committee. A foreign subsidiary or parent will not be a designated subsidiary unless specifically designated by the Compensation Committee.

No person will be eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan if such person, immediately after the grant, would own common stock and/or hold options to purchase common stock, possessing five percent or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of common stock of the Company or a subsidiary or parent, or which permits his or her rights to purchase common stock under all employee stock purchase plans of the Company to accrue at a rate which exceeds $25,000 in fair market value of the common stock (determined at the time such option is granted) for each calendar year in which such option is outstanding. In addition, no person may purchase shares in any one offering for an aggregate purchase price (computed on an annual basis in the event a purchase period is more or less than twelve months) in excess of ten percent of his or her annual pay.

On January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each calendar year while the Purchase Plan is effective, the Company will commence an offer by granting each eligible employee an option to purchase common stock on the exercise date at the end of each quarterly period during a calendar year (i.e., March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31) or any other period of time designated by the Compensation Committee. The

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.592017 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL TWO — APPROVAL OF THE ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

purchase price per share of the common stock subject to an offering will be determined by the Compensation Committee, but in no event will the price be less than 85% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the exercise date. Effective as of January 1, 2018, until modified by the Compensation and Stock Incentive Committee, the purchase price will be 85% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the exercise date. The Compensation Committee may modify (but not below the aforementioned price) the purchase price upon 30 days’ notice prior to the commencement of the applicable offering period.

An eligible employee may become a participant in the Purchase Plan by completing and delivering the form provided by the Compensation Committee (or designee) indicating the amount of the deductions to be taken from his or her pay. An eligible employee may purchase common stock through payroll deductions (on anafter-tax basis) from the employee’s compensation received each payroll period, up to a limit specified by the Compensation Committee, which may be expressed as a dollar amount or a percentage of an employee’s compensation, but in no event will such deductions exceed 10% of an employee’s compensation during an offering period. A participant may increase or decrease the rate of his or her payroll deductions during an offering period once in a calendar year and may cancel his or her election at any time with respect to any purchase period and receive in cash the cash balance (without interest) then credited to his or her account.

On each exercise date, the maximum number of shares of common stock, including fractional shares, will be purchased for such participant at the applicable purchase price with the accumulated payroll deductions in the participant’s account. If all or a portion of the shares cannot reasonably be purchased on such date because of unavailability or any other reason, such purchase will be made as soon as thereafter feasible. A participant is entitled to all rights as a stockholder as soon as the shares are credited to his or her account.

If a participant’s continuous service terminates for any reason, or if a participant ceases to be an eligible employee, the entire payroll deduction amount of such employee on the effective date of any such occurrence will be used to purchase shares as of the next occurring exercise date; but, if a designated subsidiary is no longer part of the Purchase Plan, the entire payroll deduction amount credited to a participant who is employed by such subsidiary will be refunded to such employee. Other rules apply if a participant is granted a leave of absence or is laid off.

The Purchase Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may delegate its duties and responsibilities under the Purchase Plan, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion.

The Board of Directors (or a duly authorized committee thereof) may at any time and for any reason terminate, freeze or amend the Purchase Plan. Except as otherwise described in the Purchase Plan, no termination may adversely affect any purchase right previously granted and no amendment may change any purchase right theretofore granted which adversely affects the rights of any participant. No amendment will be effective unless approved by the stockholders of the Company if stockholder approval of such amendment is required to comply with Code Section 423 or to comply with any other applicable law, regulation or stock exchange rule.

Neither payroll deductions credited to a participant’s account nor any rights with regard to the purchase of or right to receive shares of common stock under the Purchase Plan may be assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise disposed of in any way (other than by will, the laws of descent and distribution or as otherwise provided in the Purchase Plan) by the participant.

The Purchase Plan is not subject to any of the requirements of ERISA. The Purchase Plan is not, nor is it intended to be, qualified under Code Section 401(a).

Because future rights to purchase common stock under the Purchase Plan will be based upon prospective factors, including the amount of payroll deductions elected by a participant, actual rights to purchase common stock under the Purchase Plan with respect to ournon-executive officer employee group cannot be determined at this time. As noted above, our executive officers are not eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan.

UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

The Purchase Plan is intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Code Section 423. Neither the grant of a right to purchase common stock under the Purchase Plan nor the purchase of such common stock will have any immediate tax consequence for a participating employee. As of the date of proxy statement, if the participating employee does not dispose of the common stock within two years from the date the right to purchase was granted to him or her or within one year from the date the common stock was purchased, any gain or loss realized upon the disposition of shares will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss to the participant, provided that where the purchase price is less than 100% (but not less than 85%) of fair market value the participant will realize ordinary income equal to the lesser of: (i) the amount, if any, by which the purchase price was exceeded by the fair market value of the common stock at the time the right to purchase was granted or

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.602017 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL TWO — APPROVAL OF THE ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

(ii) the amount, if any, by which the purchase price was exceeded by the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the disposition or the participant’s death. No income tax deduction will be allowed to the Company with respect to common stock purchased under the Purchase Plan by a participant provided such common stock is held for the required periods. The earlier disposition of the common stock (i.e., a “disqualifying disposition”) will result in the lesser of: (i) the excess of the fair market value of the common stock at the time of purchase over the purchase price; or (ii) the excess of the fair market value of the common stock at the time of disposition over the purchase price, being treated as income and taxed at ordinary income tax rates in the year in which the disposition occurred, in which case the Company will generally be entitled to a corresponding deduction.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THIS PROPOSAL.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.612017 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL THREE — RESOLUTION ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


SUMMARY OF THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION

The Company seeks your advisory vote on the compensation programs of our NEOs for fiscal 20172019 pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act (which was added by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and the related SEC rules promulgated thereunder) (commonly referred to as“Say-on-Pay” “Say-on-Pay”). The Company asks that you support the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and the accompanying tables contained in this proxy statement starting on page 22.

21.

Our compensation program for executives including our NEOs is designed to attract and retain quality leaders with an emphasis on pay-for-performance and creatinglong-term sustainable and profitable growth. Our compensation elements seek to balance all aspects of an executive’s responsibilities: base salary forday-to-day responsibilities; cash incentive bonus for shorter-term returns linked tosemi-annual Company performance; and equity awards for aligning the executives’ focus with stockholder value and thelong-term, future performance of the Company.

As noted above, at our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders were presented with an advisory vote seeking approval of our fiscal 20162018 NEOs executive compensation program, commonly known as the“say-on-pay” “say-on-pay” proposal. Our 2013 and 2014say-on-pay proposals were overwhelmingly supported by stockholders with a favorable vote of over 92% of votes cast each year. At our 2015 Annual Meeting, approximately 57% of the votes cast were in favor of our executive compensation program as disclosed in our proxy statement for fiscal 2015, which included favorable votes from three of our top five largest investors (representing over 21.1% of shares outstanding). While fiscal 2015say-on-pay results reflect continued majority support of our program, this level of support was a significant decline from the prior year’s advisory vote. As a result of the changes made to our compensation practices over the past few years and stockholder engagement, our 2016 and 2017 say-on-pay proposal was proposals received overwhelmingly supported by stockholders with a favorable vote of over 98%91% of votes cast. At our 2018 Annual Meeting, the Company continued to receive significant favorable stockholder support of its compensation program with a favorable vote in excess of 91% of votes cast. As noted above, we believe we have addressed many of the topics previously raised by our stockholders and continue to welcome feedback to assist in ongoing evaluations of our compensation and governance practices.

To ensure apay-for-performance culture and strong alignment between our executive compensation programs and shareholder interests, the Compensation Committee approved a series of key tenets of our programs. These key features are detailed in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis under “What We Do” and “What We Don’t Do”. These program principles promote best practices, transparency and accountability regarding executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee continuously reviews industry practices, receives independent consultation and ensures the programs adhere to these key features.

The Company has in the past sought and received stockholder approval for certain of the incentive plans that we use to motivate, retain and reward our executives. Those incentive plans include the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (formerly known as the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan), for which our stockholders approved an amendment and restatement at our 2015 annual meeting, and the 162(m) Executive Bonus Plan, which the stockholders last approved in 2013. The amendment and restatement of the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan in December 2015 incorporated the Amended and Restated Executive 162(m) Bonus Plan into the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, and we renamed the revised plan, the “2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.” Amounts paid under these stockholder approved plans make up a majority of the pay that the Company provides to our NEOs.

The Company believes that the compensation paid to its NEOs for fiscal 20172019 is appropriate and in line with the Company’s goals of creating long-term sustainable and profitable growth and aligning the interests of our NEOs with the interests of our stockholders.

The vote on this resolution is not intended to address any specific elements of compensation, rather, the vote relates to the overall compensation of the NEOs as described in this proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. The vote is advisory, which means that the vote is not binding on the Company, the Board or the Compensation Committee. However, to the extent there is any significant vote against the NEO compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address the concerns of stockholders.

Accordingly, the Board recommends that the stockholders approve the following advisory resolution:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s NEOs for fiscal 2017,2019, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of RegulationS-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby approved.

Vote Required

The say-on-pay proposal will be approved, by non-binding advisory vote, if the votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the votes cast in opposition of the proposal.
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THIS PROPOSAL.



LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.676220172019 Proxy Statement




PROPOSAL FOURTHREE ADVISORY APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE FREQUENCYCOMPANY’S THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF ASCENA’SINCORPORATION TO EFFECT A REVERSE STOCK SPLIT OF THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK AND A CORRESPONDING REDUCTION IN THE COMPANY’S AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK

SAY-ON-PAYGeneral VOTES

InProposal Four, we are asking our stockholders to cast anon-binding advisory vote on the Company’s executive compensation program. That advisory vote

Ascena is referred to as a“say-on-pay” vote. In this Proposal Four, we are asking stockholders to castadopt and approve eleven alternative amendments to our Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect anon-binding advisory vote on how frequently we should havesay-on-pay votes reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”) of our issued and outstanding common stock and to reduce the number of authorized shares of our common stock by a corresponding ratio (collectively, the “Reverse Stock Split Amendment”). On October 2, 2019, our Board unanimously approved and declared advisable the proposed Reverse Stock Split Amendment, and recommends that our stockholders adopt and approve the proposed Reverse Stock Split Amendment. If approved by stockholders, this proposal will authorize eleven alternative amendments to our Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect the Reverse Stock Split at a ratio of each whole number in the future.

Stockholders may vote whetherrange of 1-for-15 to holdsay-on-votes every one, two or three years; stockholders also have1-for-25, and to effect a corresponding reduction in the option to abstain from voting onnumber of the Company’s authorized shares of common stock. The actual ratio in this matter. The interval selectedrange at which the Reverse Stock Split and the corresponding reduction in the number of the Company’s authorized shares of common stock will be effected will be determined by the highestBoard of Directors prior to the effectiveness of the Reverse Stock Split Amendment, and the alternative amendments to our Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with respect to each other whole number ratio in this range will be abandoned.

The effective date of the Reverse Stock Split will be determined at the discretion of the Board, and may occur as soon as the day of the 2019 annual meeting, or at any time prior to the 2020 annual meeting. The effective date of the Reverse Stock Split will be publicly announced by Ascena. The Board may determine in its discretion not to effect the Reverse Stock Split and not to file any amendment to our Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
The number of votes castauthorized shares of our common stock after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split, if and when effected, will depend on the Reverse Stock Split ratio that is ultimately determined by the Board and reflected in the Reverse Stock Split Amendment filed with the Delaware Secretary of State. As of October 15, 2019, we had 360,000,000 shares of authorized common stock and [198,000,000] shares of common stock issued and outstanding. The proposed Reverse Stock Split Amendment would result in a reduction of the total number of shares of Ascena common stock that we are authorized to issue by a corresponding ratio.
The table below illustrates (as of August 3, 2019) the impact of the Reverse Stock Split ratio as a result of three illustrative alternative amendments along with the corresponding effect (without consideration of the number of resulting fractional shares of common stock that will be exchanged for cash) on:
The number of shares of authorized common stock as adjusted to correspond with the recommendationReverse Stock Split ratio;
The number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding;
The number of shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our equity compensation plans; and
The number of shares of common stock that will remain authorized and available for issuance, including treasury shares.
STATUSSHARES OF COMMON STOCK AUTHORIZEDSHARES OF COMMON STOCK ISSUED AND OUTSTANDINGSHARES OF COMMON STOCK RESERVED FOR FUTURE ISSUANCE (including options and RSUs)SHARES OF COMMON STOCK AVAILABLE FOR FUTURE ISSUANCE
Pre-Reverse Stock Split360,000,000198,499,31924,365,49818,764,734
After 1:15 Reverse Stock Split24,000,00012,233,2881,624,3671,250,982
After 1:20 Reverse Stock Split18,000,0009,924,9661,218,275938,237
After 1:25 Reverse Stock Split14,400,0007,939,973974,620750,589
The examples in the table above are presented for illustrative purposes only, and the Board may elect to effect the Reverse Stock Split at a ratio of any whole number in the range of 1-for-15 to 1-for-25 if this proposal is approved by our stockholders.
If we effect the Reverse Stock Split, then, except for adjustments that may result from the treatment of fractional shares as described below, each stockholder will hold the same percentage of the stockholders.

then-outstanding shares of common stock immediately following the Reverse Stock Split that such stockholder held immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split. The Board believespar value of our common stock will remain unchanged at this time thatsay-on-pay votes should$0.01 per share. No fractional shares of common stock will be held annually. We have put forward an advisorysay-on-pay vote annual since 2011. Although this advisory vote on frequency isnon-binding,issued as a result of the Board values stockholder views as to what is an appropriate frequency for advisory votes on executive compensation and welcome the stockholders’ recommendation on this proposal.

Reverse Stock Split.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THEONE-YEAR OPTION AS THE FREQUENCY OF THE COMPANY’SSAY-ON-PAY ADVISORY VOTES.


LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.686320172019 Proxy Statement




Instead, any stockholder who would be entitled to receive a fractional share as a result of the Reverse Stock Split will receive a cash payment in lieu of such fractional share.
If the proposed Reverse Stock Split Amendment is adopted and approved by our stockholders and the Board elects to effect the Reverse Stock Split, we will file a Certificate of Amendment to our Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Delaware Secretary of State, substantially in the form of the Certificate of Amendment attached as Annex A to this proxy statement, that sets forth the Reverse Stock Split Amendment and the Reverse Stock Split ratio as determined by the Board, and each other alternative amendment contemplated by this proposal will be abandoned. The Certificate of Amendment will be effective immediately upon filing with the Delaware Secretary of State or such later time as is set forth therein. The Board also may determine in its discretion to abandon each such amendment, not effect the Reverse Stock Split and not file any Certificate of Amendment with respect to any of the alternative amendments contemplated by this proposal.
Background and Reasons for the Reverse Stock Split
On July 29, 2019, the Company received a notification letter from the Listings Qualifications department staff of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) notifying the Company that it had failed to maintain a minimum closing bid price of $1.00 per share for the shares of its common stock for a period of 30 consecutive business days as required by Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(a)(1) (the “Bid Price Rule”) for continued listing on The Nasdaq Global Select Market. The notification does not affect the listing of the Company’s common stock at this time, and the Company’s shares have continued to trade on The Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “ASNA”.
The letter provides that Ascena has 180 calendar days, or until January 27, 2020, to regain compliance with the Bid Price Rule by maintaining a closing bid price of $1.00 per share for a minimum of ten consecutive business days. If at any time during such 180-day period the bid price of Ascena’s common stock closes at $1.00 per share or more for a minimum of ten consecutive business days, Nasdaq will notify Ascena that it has achieved compliance with the Bid Price Rule.
If the Company does not regain compliance with the Bid Price Rule by January 27, 2020, the Company may submit a transfer application to The Nasdaq Capital Market in order to receive an additional 180 calendar day period to comply, provided that the Company meets the continued listing requirement for market value of publicly held shares and all other initial listing standards for The Nasdaq Capital Market, other than the Bid Price Rule, and provides written notice to Nasdaq of its intention to cure the deficiency during the additional compliance period.
If the Company does not regain compliance with the Bid Price Rule by January 27, 2020 and is not eligible for an additional compliance period at that time, Nasdaq will notify the Company that its common stock may be delisted. At that time, the Company may appeal the decision to a Listing Qualifications Panel.
We believe that the Reverse Stock Split, by increasing our stock price, will make our common stock more attractive to a broader range of institutional and other investors. Many brokerage houses and institutional investors have internal policies and practices that either prohibit them from investing in low-priced stocks or tend to discourage individual brokers from recommending low-priced stocks to their customers. Some of those policies and practices may function to make the processing of trades in low-priced stocks economically unattractive to brokers. Because brokers’ commissions on low-priced stocks generally represent a higher percentage of the stock price than commissions on higher-priced stocks, the current trading prices of our common stock can result in individual stockholders paying transaction costs that are a higher percentage of the value of the transaction than would be the case if the share price were substantially higher. We believe that the Reverse Stock Split, when effected, will make our common stock a more attractive and cost-effective investment for many investors.
Our Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to maintain the listing of Ascena common stock on Nasdaq. We may not be able to regain compliance with the Bid Price Rule unless we effect the Reverse Stock Split. Our Board recommends approval of the proposed Reverse Stock Split Amendment so that the Reverse Stock Split may be implemented to the extent necessary to maintain the listing of our common stock on The Nasdaq Global Select Market.
Reducing the number of outstanding shares of our common stock through the Reverse Stock Split is intended, absent other factors, to increase the per share market price of our common stock. However, other factors, such as our financial results, market conditions and the market perception of our business, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. As a result, there can be no assurance that the Reverse Stock Split, if implemented, will produce the intended results, that the market price of our common stock will increase following the implementation of the Reverse Stock Split or that the market price of our common stock will not decrease in the future. Additionally, we cannot assure you that the market price per share of our common stock after the Reverse Stock Split will increase in proportion to the reduction in the number of shares of our common stock outstanding before the Reverse Stock Split. Accordingly, the total market capitalization of our common stock after the Reverse Stock Split may be lower than the total market capitalization before the Reverse Stock Split.
The Delaware General Corporation Law does not require a reduction in the total number of authorized shares of our common stock at the time of the Reverse Stock Split. However, as a matter of good governance, our Board has determined to implement a pro-rata reduction in the total number of authorized shares of common stock at the time of the Reverse Stock Split. Accordingly, if stockholders adopt and approve the proposed Reverse Stock Split Amendment and the Reverse Stock Split is implemented, the authorized number of shares of our common stock also will be reduced by a corresponding ratio.



Ascena Retail Group, Inc.692019 Proxy Statement



Board Discretion to Implement the Reverse Stock Split
The Board believes that stockholder adoption and approval of the alternative amendments reflecting the Reverse Stock Split at a ratio of each whole number within the range of 1-for-15 to 1-for-25 is in the best interests of our stockholders because it provides the Board and the Company with the flexibility to achieve the desired results of the Reverse Stock Split and because it is not possible to predict market conditions at the time the Reverse Stock Split is implemented. If our stockholders approve this proposal, the Board will implement the Reverse Stock Split only upon a determination that the Reverse Stock Split is in the best interests of the stockholders at that time. The Board will then select the ratio for the Reverse Stock Split from the alternative amendments adopted and approved by the stockholders that the Board determines to be advisable and in the best interests of the stockholders, considering relevant market conditions at the time the Reverse Stock Split is to be implemented. The factors that the Board may consider in determining the Reverse Stock Split ratio include, but are not limited to, the following:
the historical and projected trading price and trading volume of our common stock;
general economic and other related conditions prevailing in our industry and in the marketplace;
our ability to meet the continued listing standards of Nasdaq, including the Bid Price Rule; and
the anticipated impact of a particular ratio on our ability to reduce administrative and transactional costs.
The Board intends to select the Reverse Stock Split ratio that it believes will be most likely to achieve the anticipated benefits of the Reverse Stock Split described above. The Reverse Stock Split is not intended as, and will not have the effect of, a “going private transaction” covered by Rule 13e-3 under the Exchange Act. Following the implementation of the Reverse Stock Split, we will continue to be subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act.
Certain Risks and Potential Disadvantages Associated with the Reverse Stock Split
We cannot assure you that the proposed Reverse Stock Split will increase our stock price. We expect that the Reverse Stock Split will increase the per share trading price of our common stock. However, the effect of the Reverse Stock Split on the per share trading price of our common stock cannot be predicted with any certainty, and the history of reverse stock splits for other companies is varied. It is possible that the per share trading price of our common stock after the Reverse Stock Split will not increase in the same proportion as the reduction in the number of our outstanding shares of common stock following the Reverse Stock Split. In addition, although we believe the Reverse Stock Split may enhance the marketability of our common stock to certain potential investors, we cannot assure you that, if implemented, our common stock will be more attractive to investors. Even if we implement the Reverse Stock Split, the per share trading price of our common stock may decrease due to factors unrelated to the Reverse Stock Split, including our future performance. If the Reverse Stock Split is consummated and the per share trading price of our common stock declines, the percentage decline as an absolute number and as a percentage of our overall market capitalization may be greater than would occur in the absence of the Reverse Stock Split.
We cannot assure you that we will regain and continue in compliance with the continued listing criteria of Nasdaq. Even if our stockholders adopt and approve the proposed Reverse Stock Split Amendment and the Reverse Stock Split is effected, there can be no assurance that we will regain compliance with the Nasdaq continued listing criteria and/or continue to meet the Nasdaq continued listing criteria.
The proposed Reverse Stock Split may decrease the liquidity of our common stock and result in higher transaction costs. The liquidity of our common stock may be negatively impacted by the Reverse Stock Split, given the reduced number of shares that will be outstanding after the Reverse Stock Split, particularly if the per share trading price does not increase as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. In addition, if the Reverse Stock Split is implemented, it may increase the number of our stockholders who own “odd lots” of fewer than 100 shares of common stock. Brokerage commissions and other costs of transactions in odd lots are generally higher than the costs of transactions of more than 100 shares of common stock. Accordingly, the Reverse Stock Split may not achieve the desired result of increasing the marketability of our common stock.
Effects of the Reverse Stock Split
General
The principal effect of the Reverse Stock Split, if implemented by the Board, would be to proportionately decrease the number of issued and outstanding shares of our common stock based on the ratio selected by our Board, which will result in each stockholder owning a reduced number of shares of common stock after the effective date of the Reverse Stock Split. The actual number of shares issued and outstanding and ultimately owned by each stockholder after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split, if implemented, would depend on the ratio for the Reverse Stock Split that is ultimately determined by our Board. The Reverse Stock Split would affect all holders of our common stock uniformly and would not affect any stockholder’s percentage ownership interest in the Company, except that, as described below under “Mechanics of the Reverse Stock Split-Fractional Shares,” holders of common stock otherwise entitled to a fractional share as a result of the Reverse Stock Split would receive cash in lieu of such fractional share. In addition, the Reverse Stock Split would not affect any stockholder’s proportionate voting power, subject to the treatment of fractional shares.
The Reverse Stock Split may result in some stockholders owning “odd lots” of less than 100 shares of common stock. Odd lot shares may be more difficult to sell, and brokerage commissions and other costs of transactions in odd lots may be higher than the costs of transactions in “round lots” of even multiples of 100 shares.

Ascena Retail Group, Inc.702019 Proxy Statement



After the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split, our common stock will have a new Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures, or CUSIP, number, which is a number used to identify our common stock.
Effect on Capital Stock
Pursuant to our Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, our capital stock consists of 360,100,000 shares, which includes 360,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01, and 100,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, none of which are outstanding. The proposed Reverse Stock Split will have no impact on the total authorized number of shares of preferred stock or the par value of the preferred stock, and will have no impact on the par value of the common stock. If the proposed Reverse Stock Split is implemented, the shares of authorized common stock will be reduced in proportion to the Reverse Stock Split ratio selected by the Board as illustrated in the table above. As a result, if and when the Reverse Stock Split is effected, the same proportion of authorized but unissued shares of common stock to shares of common stock authorized and issued (or reserved for issuance, including treasury shares) would be maintained (except for any changes as a result of the treatment of fractional shares). If the Reverse Stock Split is abandoned, the decrease in the number of authorized shares will also be abandoned.
Accounting Matters
As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, at the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split, the stated capital on the Company’s balance sheet attributable to our common stock, which consists of the par value per share of our common stock multiplied by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, will be reduced in proportion to the Reverse Stock Split ratio chosen by the Board. Correspondingly, the Company’s additional paid-in capital account, which consists of the difference between the Company’s stated capital and the aggregate amount paid to the Company upon issuance of all currently outstanding shares of common stock, will be credited with the amount by which the stated capital is reduced. The Company’s stockholders’ equity, in the aggregate, will remain unchanged. The historical earnings or loss per share of our common stock reported in all financial reports published after the effective date of the Reverse Stock Split will be restated to reflect the proportionate decrease in the number of outstanding shares of common stock for all periods presented so that the results are comparable.
Effect on the Company’s Omnibus Incentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The proposed Reverse Stock Split will reduce the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under our equity compensation plans in proportion to the Reverse Stock Split ratio selected by the board. As of October 15, 2019, we had approximately [____________] shares of unvested restricted stock, [______________] shares subject to unvested restricted stock units and [_____________] shares subject to stock options outstanding under our plans. Under the terms of our 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the proposed Reverse Stock Split would cause a reduction in the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise, vesting or conversion of such awards in proportion to the Reverse Stock Split ratio and would cause a proportionate increase in any exercise price of such awards, with any resulting fractional shares rounded up to the next whole share. The Compensation Committee has also authorized any changes to our stock incentive plans that are necessary, desirable or appropriate to give effect to the Reverse Stock Split, if any, including any applicable, technical conforming changes. The shares held in the employee stock purchase plan will be reduced in proportion to the Reverse Stock Split ratio. The employee stock purchase plan provides for fractional shares to be held by participants; therefore, fractional shares will be credited to the participants’ accounts.
Mechanics of the Reverse Stock Split
Holders of registered shares of our common stock that hold only in book-entry form do not need to take any action to receive post-Reverse Stock Split shares of our common stock in registered book-entry form or your cash payment in lieu of fractional shares, if applicable. If you hold any shares in certificated form you will receive separate instructions from our transfer agent. If you are entitled to post-Reverse Stock Split shares of our common stock, a transaction statement will automatically be sent to your address of record as soon as practicable after the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split indicating the number of shares of our common stock you then hold. In addition, if you are entitled to a payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares, a check will be mailed to you at your registered address as soon as practicable after the effective time. By signing and cashing this check, you will warrant that you owned the shares of Ascena common stock for which you received the cash payment.
If you hold your shares of common stock in street name, your broker, bank or other intermediary will be instructed to effect the Reverse Stock Split for their beneficial holders holding shares of our common stock in “street name” in the same manner as registered holders; however, these brokers, banks or other intermediaries may apply their own specific procedures for processing the Reverse Stock Split. If you hold your shares of our common stock with a broker, bank or other intermediary, and you have any questions in this regard, we encourage you to contact your bank, broker or other intermediary.
If you hold any of your shares of our common stock in certificate form, you will receive a transmittal letter from our transfer agent as soon as practicable after the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split. The transmittal letter will be accompanied by instructions specifying how you can deliver your stock certificates to the transfer agent and exchange them for shares of common stock held in book-entry form. We will not issue new certificates, and following the Reverse Stock Split, shares will be held only in book-entry form. Stockholders will not have to pay any transfer fee or other fee in connection with such exchange. As soon as practicable after your delivery to the transfer agent of the transmittal letter and your stock certificate(s), you will receive a transaction statement showing the post-Reverse Stock Splits shares of common stock you own in book-entry form together with any payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares to which you are entitled. After the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split, any shares of common stock you hold in certificate from representing pre-split shares of common stock cannot be traded for value, other than in accordance with the exchange procedures described above, and cannot be used for either transfers or deliveries of your shares to other persons. Accordingly, you much

Ascena Retail Group, Inc.712019 Proxy Statement



exchange your stock certificates for shares held in book-entry form in order to trade your shares for value or to effect transfers or deliveries of your shares after the Reverse Stock Split.
As soon as practicable after the surrender to the transfer agent of any stock certificates, together with a properly completed and duly executed transmittal letter and any other documents the transfer agent may specify, the transfer agent will adjust its records to reflect that the shares of common stock represented by such stock certificates are held in book-entry form in the name of such person.
Fractional Shares
Stockholders will not receive fractional shares of common stock in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. Instead, the transfer agent will aggregate all fractional shares and sell them as soon as practicable after the effective time at the then-prevailing prices on the open market, on behalf of those stockholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive a fractional share as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. We expect that the transfer agent will conduct the sale in an orderly fashion at a reasonable pace and that it may take several days to sell all of the aggregated fractional shares of our common stock. After the transfer agent’s completion of such sale, stockholders who would have been entitled to a fractional share will instead receive a cash payment from the transfer agent in an amount equal to their respective pro-rata shares of the total proceeds of that sale net of any brokerage costs incurred by the transfer agent to sell such stock. The cash payment is subject to applicable U.S. federal and state income tax and state abandoned property (or escheat) laws. After the Reverse Stock Split, a stockholder will have no further interest in the Company with respect to any fractional share interest, and a stockholder otherwise entitled to a fractional share will not have any voting, dividend or other rights with respect to the fractional share except the right to receive a cash payment as described above. Stockholders will not be entitled to receive interest for the period of time between the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split and the date payment is made for their fractional share interests.
In addition, under the escheat laws of certain states, funds due for fractional share interests that are not timely claimed after the funds are made available may be required to be paid to the designated agent for each such state. Thereafter, stockholders otherwise entitled to receive such funds may have to obtain the funds directly from the state to which they were paid.
If you do not hold sufficient shares of Ascena common stock at the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split to receive at least one share following the Reverse Stock Split, you will receive cash and will no longer be a holder of Ascena common stock. Shares of our common stock held in “street name” by your broker, bank or other intermediary for the same shareholder will be considered to be held in separate accounts and will not be aggregated when effecting the Reverse Stock Split and determining fractional share interests.
Effective Time
The effective time of the Reverse Stock Split, if the proposed Reverse Stock Split Amendment is adopted and approved by stockholders and the Reverse Stock Split is implemented at the direction of the Board, will be the date and time that the Certificate of Amendment effecting the amendment with the ratio selected by the Board is filed with the Delaware Secretary of State or such later time as is specified therein. Such filing may occur as soon as the day following the Annual Meeting or at any time prior to the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders. However, the exact timing of the Reverse Stock Split will be determined by our Board based on its evaluation as to when such action will be the most advantageous to Ascena and its stockholders.
The Reverse Stock Split may be delayed or abandoned without further action by the stockholders at any time prior to the filing and effectiveness of the Certificate of Amendment with the Delaware Secretary of State, notwithstanding stockholder adoption and approval of each of the amendments effecting the proposed Reverse Stock Split, if the Board, in its sole discretion, determines that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to delay or abandon the Reverse Stock Split. If the Certificate of Amendment implementing the Reverse Stock Split has not been filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on or before the date of the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, the Board will be deemed to have abandoned each alternative amendment effecting the Reverse Stock Split. In addition, if a Certificate of Amendment effecting the Reverse Stock Split is filed and becomes effective, the alternative amendments reflecting the other proposed ratios will be deemed to have been abandoned.
Appraisal Rights
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, our stockholders are not entitled to dissenter’s rights or appraisal rights with respect to the Reverse Stock Split and we will not independently provide our stockholders with any such rights.
Interest of Certain Persons in Matters to be Acted Upon
No officer or director has any substantial interest, direct or indirect, by security holdings or otherwise, in the Reverse Stock Split that is not shared by all of our other stockholders.
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Reverse Stock Split
The following discussion is a general summary of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Reverse Stock Split that may be relevant to stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes. This summary is based upon the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, administrative rulings and judicial decisions as of the date of this proxy statement, all of which may change, possibly with retroactive effect, resulting in U.S. federal income tax consequences that may differ from those discussed below.
This discussion applies only to holders of our common stock that are U.S. Holders (as defined below) and does not address all aspects of federal income taxation that may be relevant to such holders in light of their particular circumstances or to holders that may be subject to special tax rules, including: (i) holders subject to the alternative minimum tax; (ii) banks, insurance companies, or other

Ascena Retail Group, Inc.722019 Proxy Statement



financial institutions; (iii) tax-exempt organizations; (iv) dealers in securities or commodities; (v) regulated investment companies or real estate investment trusts; (vi) partnerships (or other flow-through entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes and their partners or members); (vii) traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings; (viii) U.S. Holders whose “functional currency” is not the U.S. dollar; (ix) persons holding our common stock as a position in a hedging transaction, “straddle,” “conversion transaction” or other risk reduction transaction; (x) persons who acquire shares of our common stock in connection with employment or other performance of services; or (xi) U.S. expatriates. If a partnership (including any entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds shares of our common stock, the tax treatment of a holder that is a partner in the partnership generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership.
We have not sought, and will not seek, an opinion of counsel or a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Reverse Stock Split and there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the statements and conclusions set forth below or that a court would not sustain any such challenge. The following summary does not address any U.S. state or local or any foreign tax consequences, any estate, gift or other non-U.S. federal income tax consequences, or the Medicare tax on net investment income.
EACH HOLDER OF COMMON STOCK SHOULD CONSULT SUCH HOLDER’S OWN TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT TO SUCH HOLDER.
For purposes of the discussion below, a “U.S. Holder“ is a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock that for U.S. federal income tax purposes is: (1) an individual citizen or resident of the United States; (2) a corporation (including any entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, or any state or political subdivision thereof; (3) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or (4) a trust, if (i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) the trust has a valid election in effect to be treated as a U.S. person.
The Board intends the Reverse Stock Split to be treated as a “recapitalization” under Section 368(a)(1)(E) of the Code, although no assurances are provided in this regard. In such case, we should not recognize gain or loss in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. Also, a U.S. Holder generally should not recognize gain or loss upon the Reverse Stock Split, except with respect to cash received in lieu of a fractional share of our common stock, as discussed below. A U.S. Holder’s aggregate tax basis in the shares of our common stock received pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split should equal the aggregate tax basis of the shares of our common stock surrendered (excluding any portion of such basis that is allocated to any fractional share of our common stock), and such U.S. Holder’s holding period in the shares of our common stock received should include the holding period in the shares of our common stock surrendered. Holders of shares of our common stock acquired on different dates and at different prices should consult their own tax advisors regarding the allocation of the tax basis and holding period of such shares.
A U.S. Holder that receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of our common stock pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split should recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount of cash received and the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the shares of our common stock surrendered that is allocated to such fractional share. Such capital gain or loss should be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder’s holding period for our common stock surrendered exceeded one year at the effective time of the Reverse Stock Split.
Payments of cash made in lieu of a fractional share of our common stock may, under certain circumstances, be subject to information reporting and backup withholding. To avoid backup withholding, each holder of our common stock that does not otherwise establish an exemption must furnish on applicable IRS forms its taxpayer identification number and comply with the applicable certification procedures.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax and amounts withheld will be allowed as a credit against the holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle such holder to a refund, provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS. Holders of our common stock should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the information reporting and backup withholding rules to them.
Vote Required
Under Delaware General Corporate Law, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the annual meeting is required to adopt and approve the proposed alternative amendments to our Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect the Reverse Stock Split and the corresponding reduction in authorized shares of common stock at a ratio of each whole number within the range of 1-for-15 to 1-for-25. Because adoption and approval of the proposed to our Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect the Reverse Stock Split requires a majority of the outstanding shares, an abstention with respect to the Reverse Stock Split proposal will have the same effect as a vote ”against” the proposal. Brokers have discretion to vote on this Proposal 3 pursuant to the rules of the NYSE, therefore, no broker non-votes are anticipated with respect to this proposal.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL.


Ascena Retail Group, Inc.732019 Proxy Statement



PROPOSAL FIVEFOUR — RATIFICATION OF THE ENGAGEMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte & Touche”) to provide audit services to us and our subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending August 4, 2018.1, 2020. The stockholders are being requested to ratify such selection at the Annual Meeting. A representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and make any statements he or she deem necessary and to respond to appropriate stockholder questions.

Vote Required
Although this appointment is not required to be submitted to a vote of the stockholders, the Audit Committee believes it is appropriate as a matter of policy to request that the stockholders ratify the appointment. Assuming a quorum is present, the appointment of Deloitte & Touche as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the fiscal year ending August 4, 20181, 2020 will be ratified if the votes cast in favor of ratification exceed the votes cast in opposition to ratification, present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will consider the selection of another independent registered public accounting firm.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE AS INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE COMPANYFOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING AUGUST 4, 2018.1, 2020.


Ascena Retail Group, Inc.742019 Proxy Statement



INFORMATION REGARDING THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee selected Deloitte & Touche as auditors with respect to the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ending August 4, 2018.

1, 2020.

FEES PAID TO INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The following table shows the fees billed by Deloitte & Touche for the past two fiscal years for audit and other related fees:

   Fiscal 2017   Fiscal 2016    

Audit Fees(1)

  $4,905,150   $5,958,000   

Audit-Related Fees(2)

  $207,643   $221,099   

Tax Fees(3)

  $258,429   $275,355   

All Other Fees(4)

  $511,232    0   
  

 

 

 

Total Fees

  $5,882,454   $6,454,454   

 
Fiscal 2019 
Fiscal 2018
Audit Fees(1)
$3,920,000$4,305,000
Audit-Related Fees(2)
$210,562$217,062
Tax Fees(3)
$275,415$263,349
All Other Fees(4)
$722,222$225,115
Total Fees$5,128,198$5,010,526

(1)Fees for audit services billed in fiscal 20172019 and fiscal 20162018 consist of the annual audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, interim reviews of the quarterly consolidated financial statements and auditing the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(2)Audit-related fees consist principally of services performed in connection with registration statements filed with the SEC, statutory audits, and assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

(3)Tax fees includes fees for professional services provided related to tax compliance, including federal, state and local taxes, tax planning and advisory services.

(4)All other fees consist of permitted services other than those that meet the criteria above and include primarily consulting and advisory services provided by Deloitte Consulting, LLP.

The Audit Committee has established a policy concerning the pre-approval of the audit andnon-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm to the Company. The policy requires that all services to be performed by Deloitte & Touche, including audit services, audit-related services and permittednon-audit services, be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Specific services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm are regularly reviewed in accordance with the pre-approval policy. At subsequent

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.642017 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL FIVE — RATIFICATION OF THE ENGAGEMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Audit Committee meetings, the Audit Committee receives updates on services being provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, and management may present additional services for approval. The procedures permit limited amounts of services to be approved by one or more members of the Audit Committee pursuant to authority delegated by the Audit Committee.

During fiscal 2017,2019, the Audit Committee pre-approved all of the services provided by the auditors. The Audit Committee considered whether the provision ofnon-audit services is permitted under applicable laws and regulations and is compatible with maintaining the independence of Deloitte & Touche.



LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.756520172019 Proxy Statement




AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT


The following report of the Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material and will not be deemed to be filed with the SEC under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act or incorporated by reference into any document so filed except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this Audit Committee Report by reference therein.

The Audit Committee oversees our accounting and financial reporting, internal controls and audit processes on behalf of the Board and is directly responsible for the compensation, appointment and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm. Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of our financial statements and for the appropriateness of the accounting principles and reporting policies that are used. Management is also responsible for testing the system of internal control over financial reporting, and reports to the Audit Committee on any deficiencies found. Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche, is responsible for auditing our consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, as well as examining and reporting on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. Under its written charter, our Audit Committee has the authority to conduct any investigation appropriate to fulfilling its responsibilities, has direct access to our independent registered public accounting firm as well as any of our employees, and has the ability to retain, at our expense, special legal, accounting or other consultants or experts it deems necessary in the performance of its duties.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the overall scope, plan and results of the audit and the audited consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2017August 3, 2019 with management, our Internal Audit Department and Deloitte & Touche. The discussions included a review of the selection and application of the Company’s accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, the clarity of the disclosures in the Company’s financial statements and any matters that are required to be discussed under the rules adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). In addition, the Audit Committee has received from Deloitte & Touche the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountants’ communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and discussed with Deloitte & Touche their independence from management and the Company. We have received written confirmation from Deloitte & Touche of their independence within the meaning of the Securities Act and the requirements of PCAOB Ethics and Independence Rule 3526,Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence.The Audit Committee has also considered whether the provision ofnon-audit services by Deloitte & Touche is compatible with maintaining their independence, and has satisfied itself with respect to Deloitte & Touche’s independence.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board (and the Board has approved) that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2017August 3, 2019 for filing with the SEC.

This report is provided by the following directors, who currently comprise the Audit Committee.
Audit Committee:

Randy L. Pearce,

Carl Rubin, Chair

Kate Buggeln

Stacey Rauch

Carl Rubin

John Welborn, Jr.


LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.766620172019 Proxy Statement




SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT


The following table presents information concerning the beneficial ownership of the shares of our common stock as of October 10, 20172019 (unless otherwise noted) by each of our directors, each of our named executive officers, all of our directors and executive officers as a group, and each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock.

Unless otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership is direct, the person indicated has sole voting and investment power, and the address of each beneficial owner listed below is c/o Ascena Retail Group, Inc., 933 MacArthur Boulevard, Mahwah, New Jersey 07430.

  Name of Beneficial Owner:  Number of
Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
   Percent of
Class
(1)
 

Directors and Named Executive Officers:

    

David Jaffe(2)

   14,511,998    7.30

Katie J. Bayne(3)

   31,177    * 

Kate Buggeln(4)

   115,490    * 

Marc Lasry

       * 

Steven L. Kirshenbaum(5)

   33,353    * 

Kay Krill(6)

   323,957    * 

Randy L. Pearce(7)

   132,020    * 

Stacey Rauch(8)

   14,968    * 

Carl Rubin(9)

   28,353    * 

Linda Yaccarino(10)

   49,851    * 

Robb Giammatteo(11)

   73,123    * 

Brian Lynch(12)

   149,425    * 

John Pershing(13)

   181,615    * 

Duane D. Holloway(14)

   22,648    * 

All current Directors and Executive Officers as a group (consisting of 16 persons)(15)

   15,989,646    8.02

Other Beneficial Owners

    

BlackRock Inc.(16)

   19,552,550    9.98

GGC Public Equities Opportunities Investments, LLC(17)

   17,468,570    8.91

The Vanguard Group(18)

   14,986,925    7.65

Stadium Capital Management, LLC(19)

   14,751,920    7.53

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(20)

   11,149,631    5.69

Elise Jaffe(21)

   10,105,754    5.16

Name of Beneficial Owner
 
Number of
Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
Percent of
Class
(1)
Directors and Named Executive Officers:  
David Jaffe(2)
15,267,5177.53%
Gary Muto(3)
1,439,217*
Katie J. Bayne(4)
72,406*
Gary D. Begeman*
Kate Buggeln(5)
122,845*
Paul Keglevic*
Kay Krill(6)
150,186*
Stacey Rauch(7)
69,817*
Carl Rubin(8)
65,345*
Carrie W. Teffner*
John L. Welborn, Jr.*
Linda Yaccarino(9)
49,851*
Dan Lamadrid10,189*
Wendy Hufford4,713*
All current Directors and Executive Officers as a group (consisting of 14 persons)(10)
17,312,0928.50%
Other Beneficial Owners:  
Stadium Capital Management, LLC(11)
19,231,1629.65%
The Vanguard Group(12)
17,243,7548.65%
Nomura Holdings, Inc.(13)
17,007,5188.54%
Dimensional Fund Advisors(14)
16,422,4518.24%
BlackRock, Inc.(15)
13,588,5756.82%
Elise Jaffe(16)
10,350,5885.07%

*Represents less than 1% of class

(1)Based on 196,007,504199,247,000 shares of common stock outstanding as of October 10, 2017.2019.

(2)Consists of 11,661,60411,754,158 shares owned directly by David Jaffe, and 2,850,3943,513,359 shares covered by options exercisable within 60 days of October 10, 2017.2019.

(3)Consists of 31,177647,291 shares owned directly by Katie J. Bayne.

(4)Consists of 45,488Gary Muto, including 47,426 shares owned directlyjointly by Kate Buggeln,Mr. Muto and 70,002his spouse, and 791,926 shares covered by options exercisable within 60 days of October 10, 2017.2019.

(4)Consists of 72,406 shares owned directly by Katie J. Bayne.
(5)Consists of 33,35382,845 shares owned directly by Steven L. Kirshenbaum.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.672017 Proxy Statement


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT

(6)Consists of 20,245 shares owned directly by Kay Krill,Kate Buggeln, and includes 303,712 shares owned by a trust of which Ms. Krill is a trustee and beneficiary.

(7)Consists of 62,020 shares owned directly by Randy L. Pearce, and 70,00040,000 shares covered by options exercisable within 60 days of October 10, 2017.2019.

(8)
(6)Consists of 14,968150,186 shares owned directly by Kay Krill.
(7)Consists of 69,817 shares owned directly by Stacey Rauch.

(9)
(8)Consists of 28,35365,345 shares owned directly by Carl Rubin.

(10)
(9)Consists of 49,851 shares owned directly by Linda Yaccarino.

(11)Consists of 28,056 shares owned directly by Robb Giammatteo, and 45,067 shares covered by options exercisable within 60 days of October 10, 2017.

(12)Consists of 50,803 shares owned directly by Brian Lynch, and 98,622 shares covered by options exercisable within 60 days of October 10, 2017.

(13)Consists of 49,440 shares owned directly by John Pershing, and 132,175 shares covered by options exercisable within 60 days of October 10, 2017.

(14)Consists of 3,887 shares owned directly by Duane D. Holloway, and 18,761 shares covered by options exercisable within 60 days of October 10, 2017.

(15)(10)Reflects the information above, as well as information regarding our unnamed Executives Officers, and includes 3,432,7504,405,291 shares covered by options exercisable by our Directors and Executive Officers within 60 days of October 10, 2017.2019.


(16)
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.772019 Proxy Statement



(11)Based solely on information set forth in Schedule 13G13D/A filed with the SEC on January 9, 2017 by BlackRock, Inc. which indicated that BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power over 19,156,566 shares and sole dispositive power over 19,552,550 shares. The principal office of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

(17)Based solely on information set forth in Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on October 8, 2015 by GGC Public Equities Opportunities Investments, LLC, GGC Public Equities Opportunities, L.P., GGC Public Equities Opportunities Blocker Corporation, Ltd., Golden Gate Capital Opportunity Fund, L.P., Golden Gate Capital OpportunityFund-A, L.P., GGCOFCo-Invest, L.P., GGCOFCo-Invest Management, L.P., GGC Opportunity Fund Management, L.P., GGC Opportunity Fund Management GP, Ltd. and GGCOF Management, LLC (collectively, the “GGC Reporting Persons”) which indicated that the GGC Reporting Persons have shared voting power and shared dispositive power over 17,468,570 shares. The principal office of each of the GGC Reporting Persons is c/o Golden Gate Capital, One Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111.

(18)Based solely on information set forth in Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2017 by The Vanguard Group, which indicated that The Vanguard Group has sole voting power over 250,526 shares, of which 16,995 is shared voting power, shared dispositive power over 257,853 shares and sole dispositive power over 14,729,072 shares. The principal office of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355.

(19)Based solely on information set forth in Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on November 7, 2016May 17, 2018 by Stadium Capital Management, LLC, Stadium Capital Management GP, L.P., Alexander M. Seaver, Bradley R. Kent and Stadium Capital Partners, L.P. (collectively, the “Stadium Reporting Persons”) which indicated that the Stadium Reporting Persons have shared voting and dispositive power over 14,751,92019,231,162 shares. The principal office of the Stadium Reporting Persons is 199 Elm Street, New Canaan, CT 06840-5321.

(20)
(12)Based solely on information set forth in Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019 by The Vanguard Group, which indicated that The Vanguard Group has sole voting power over 178,243 shares, of which 7,663 is shared voting power, shared dispositive power over 160,735 shares and sole dispositive power over 17,083,019 shares. The principal office of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355.
(13)Based solely on information set forth in Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2019 by Nomura Holdings, Inc. and Nomura Global Financial Products, Inc. (collectively, the “Nomura Reporting Persons”) which indicated that the Nomura Reporting Persons have shared voting and dispositive power over 17,007,518 shares. The principal office of Nomura Holdings, Inc. is 1-9-1 Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-8645, Japan. The principal office of Nomura Global Financial Products, Inc. is Worldwide Plaza 309 West 49th Street, New York, NY 10019.
(14)Based solely on information set forth in Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 20172018 by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP which indicated that Dimensional Fund Advisors LP has sole voting power over 10,943,77015,663,644 shares and sole dispositive power over 11,149,63116,422,451 shares. The principal office of Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin, TX 78746.

(21)
(15)Based solely on information set forth in Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on October 9, 2019 by BlackRock, Inc. which indicated that BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power over 12,918,783 shares and sole dispositive power over 13,588,575 shares. The principal office of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.
(16)
Consists of 10,105,754 shares owned directly by Elise Jaffe, and 220,936130,671 shares covered by options exercisable within 60 days of October 10, 2017.2019.


LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.786820172019 Proxy Statement




SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE


Our executive officers and directors are required under the Exchange Act to file reports of ownership of common stock of the Company with the SEC. Copies of those reports must also be furnished to the Company. Based solely on a review of the copies of reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, the Company believes that during fiscal 20172019 the executivesexecutive officers and directors of the Company timely complied with all applicable filing requirements, except that one Form 4 filed by the Company on behalf of each of Elliot S. Jaffe, Kate Buggeln and Randy L. PearceMr. Lamadrid with respect to the vesting of RSUs and one Form 4 filed by the Company on behalf of Duane D. Holloway with respect to the grant of stock options and RSUs werewas filed late due to administrative error.




LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.796920172019 Proxy Statement




INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS; RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS


In September 2007,October 2019, the Board adopted aan updated written policy for the review and approval or ratification of any transaction with a related person,party, which applies to related personparty transactions after the adoption date of the policy. Under this policy, related personsparties include our directors and executive officers and beneficial owners who are known to control over five percent of our common stock, as well as the immediate family members of any of the foregoing. The policy generally defines a related personparty transaction as one or a series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships in which: (i) the Company was, is or will be a participant; (ii) a related person has a direct or indirect material interest; and (iii) the amount involved exceeds or is expected to exceed $120,000 (determined without regard to the amount of profit or loss involved in the transaction). The policy does not cover arrangements available on the same basis to all employees generally or employment or compensation arrangements for our executive officers or director compensation arrangements.

Under the policy, a related personparty transaction requires the approval or ratification of the Audit Committee or the Chair of the Audit Committee in those situations in which the legal department, in consultation with the General Counsel, CEO or the CFO, determines that it is not practicable or desirable for us to wait until the next Audit Committee meeting for review. Prior to approving or ratifying any transaction, the Audit Committee or the Chair of the Audit Committee will consider the material facts of the transaction, including the related person’s relationship to us and their interest in the transaction, and will determine whether the transaction is entered into in good faith and on fair and reasonable terms to us. Under the policy, ongoing related personparty transactions need not be re-approved unless any of the terms of such transaction are modified. No person may participate in the review of a transaction in which such person, or any of his or her immediate family members, may have a direct or indirect material interest.

During fiscal 2017,2019, no transactions were reviewed by the Audit Committee since there were no new related personparty transactions, or any modifications to existing related personparty transactions, during fiscal 2017.

2019.

See above under the heading “Employment Agreement, Employment Letters and Retirement Agreements,” for a description of our retirement agreements with Mrs. Roslyn S. Jaffe and Mr. Elliot S. Jaffe. Mrs. Jaffe is the spouse of Elliot S. Jaffe, Chairman Emeritus and a founder of our Company, and they are the parents of David Jaffe, a director, and former Chairman and our CEO, Elise Jaffe, a former non-executive officer and a more than 5% stockholder, and Richard Jaffe, a significant holder of the Company’s stock.

The Company (through one of its subsidiary brands) leases two of its store locations from Nordan, LLC, a Connecticut limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of Rosell III, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, of which various trusts in the names of the grandchildren of Elliot S. Jaffe maintain a 100% ownership interest. David Jaffe, oura director, and former Chairman and CEO, and Richard Jaffe are trustees of those trusts and managers of Rosell III, LLC. The following table describes the terms of these leases:

  Store Location  Expiration   Renewal Options  Square
Feet
   Minimum
Annual
Rent Per
Square Foot
 

Norwalk, Connecticut

   June 30, 2021   Until June 30, 2031   12,700   $14.13 

Danbury, Connecticut

   June 30, 2020   None   8,000   $27.98 

Store LocationExpirationRenewal OptionsSquare
Feet
Minimum
Annual
Rent Per
Square Foot
Norwalk, ConnecticutJune 30, 2021  Until June 30, 203112,700$14.13
Danbury, ConnecticutJune 30, 2020None8,000$27.98
These store rentals approximate the range of minimum rentals paid by the Company on its other store leases. The store leases also contain provisions for payment of a percentage of sales as additional rent when sales reach specified levels. The effective rent (total rent as a percentage of sales with respect to a store) for each of these stores is approximately sixteenbetween twenty-two percent (16%(22%) and twenty-six percent (26%). We believe that these leases are on terms that are comparable to terms we could obtain inarms-length negotiations with unrelated third parties for store locations in similar geographic areas. During fiscal 2017,2019, we paid a total of approximately $584,007$575,944 in rent and related expenses under these leases.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

By:

/s/ Carrie W. Teffner
 

/s/ David Jaffe

Carrie W. Teffner
David Jaffe
ChairmanInterim Executive Chair of the Board and
 Chief Executive Officer



LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.807020172019 Proxy Statement




ANNEX A
SUBJECT TO STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL
ANNEX A

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
TO THE
THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.

EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

(AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2018)


ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.

EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

(AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2018)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.Purpose.A-1
2.Definitions.A-1
3.Shares Reserved for Plan.A-3
4.Administration of the Plan.A-3
5.Participation in the Plan.A-4
6.Purchase Price.A-4
7.Method of Payment.A-4
8.Employee’s Election to Purchase; Grants of Options.A-4
9.Exercise of Option.A-5
10.Delivery of Common Stock.A-5
11.Limitations of Number of Shares Which May Be Purchased.A-5
12.Stockholder Rights.A-6
13.Rights to Purchase Shares Not Transferable.A-6
14.Cancellation of Election to Purchase.A-6
15.Leave of Absence or Layoff.A-6
16.Effect of Failure to Make Payments When Due.A-6
17.Termination of Continuous Service; Other Involuntary Withdrawal.A-7
18.Dividends, a corporation organized and existing under and Interest.A-7
19.Application of Funds.A-7
20.Amendment and Termination.A-7
21.Reports.A-7
22.Effective Date; Governmental Approvals or Consents.A-7
23.Notices.A-8
24.Regulations and Other Approvals; Governing Law.A-8
25.Withholding of Taxes.A-8
26.Restrictions.A-8
27.No Employment Rights.A-8
28.Severability of Provisions.A-9
29.Construction.A-9
30.Electronic Elections, Purchases, and Transactions.A-9

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.A-i2017 Proxy Statement


ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.

EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

(AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2018)

1. Purpose.

The purpose of the Ascena Retail Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2018) (the “Plan”) (formerly known as the Ascena Retail Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and, prior to December 17, 2010, as The Dress Barn, Inc. 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan), being subject to stockholder approval at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on December 7, 2017, is to encourage and enable eligible employees of Ascena Retail Group, Inc. (the “Company”) and its participating Designated Subsidiaries to acquire proprietary interests in the Company through the ownership of Common Stock of the Company. The Company believes that employees who participate in the Plan will have a closer identification with the Company by virtue of their ability as stockholders to participate in the Company’s growth and earnings. It is the intention of the Company to have the Plan qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the Code. Accordingly, the provisions of the Plan shall be construed so as to extend and limit participation in a manner consistent with the requirements of that sectionGeneral Corporation Law of the Code.

2. Definitions.

State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify as follows:

FIRST: The following words or terms have the following meanings:

(a) “Agent” shall mean the agent, broker or other administrator, including without limitation, employeesfirst paragraph of Section 4 of the Employer, appointed by the Committee pursuantThird Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of said Corporation is hereby amended and restated to Section 4(b) hereof.

(b) “Annual Pay” shall mean an amount equal to the annual basic rate of pay of an Eligible Employee as determined from the payroll records of the Company or Designated Subsidiary, (including amounts contributed by an Eligible Employee under Section 401(k) or 125 of the Code) but excluding all other cash compensation paid to an Eligible Employee during a Purchase Period by the Company or Designated Subsidiary. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Annual Pay shall not include overtime, bonuses, any contributions by the Company or Designated Subsidiary, to, or benefits paid under, the Plan or any other pension, profit-sharing, fringe benefit, group insurance or other employee welfare plan or any deferred compensation arrangement (other than pursuant to Section 401(k) or 125 of the Code), expenses and reimbursements, and any other special or extraordinary compensation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee,read in its sole discretion, may adjust the types of compensation constituting Annual Pay; provided that any such determination shall be applied on a uniform and consistent basis to all Eligible Employees.

(c) “Board of Directors” shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.

(d) “Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,entirety as amended.

(e) “Committee” shall mean the Compensation and Stock Incentive Committee of the Board of Directors, any successor committee or such other committee the Board of Directors of the Company appoints to administer the Plan. To the extent that no Committee exists which has the authority to administer the Plan, the functions of the Committee shall be exercised by the Board of Directors.

(f) “Company” shall mean Ascena Retail Group, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware (or any successor corporation).

(g) “Continuous Service” shall mean the period of time, uninterrupted by a termination of employment, and immediately preceding an Offering Date, that an Employee has been employed by the Company and/or a Subsidiary. Such period of time shall include any separation period of leave or layoff of less than three months occurring within such period of time. For the purposes of the Plan, any period of leave or layoff three months or longer shall be deemed to cause a termination of employment effective as of the end of the third month of such leave or layoff.

(h) “Designated Subsidiaries” shall mean each Subsidiary on the Effective Date and future Subsidiaries and Parents (if any) that are not specifically excluded from participation by the Committee from time to time in its sole discretion. In the event that the Company has Subsidiaries or Parents located in jurisdictions outside of the United States, any such Subsidiary or Parent shall not be a Designated Subsidiary unless the Committee specifically designates such Subsidiary or Parent as a Designated Subsidiary.set forth below:

“Section 4. The Committee may adopt different terms and conditions that may apply to a Designated Subsidiary, provided that such terms and conditions are consistent with the Plan and Section 423 of the Code.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.A-12017 Proxy Statement


(i) “Effective Date” shall mean January 1, 2018.

(j) “Eligible Employee” shall mean each person who on an Offering Date: (i) is an Employee of the Company or a Designated Subsidiary; (ii) has at least one year of Continuous Service; and (iii) is not deemed for the purposes of Section 423 of the Code and regulations promulgated thereunder to own, directly or indirectly and by certain rules of constructive ownership, stock possessing 5% or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes ofauthorized capital stock of the Company, a Subsidiary or Parent (if any). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may exclude the employees of any specified Designated Subsidiary from any offering under the Plan.

(k) “Employee”Corporation shall mean each person employed by the Company or a Subsidiary, excluding: (i) a person whose customary employment is 20 hours or less per week; and (ii) a person whose customary employment is not for more than five months in any calendar year; provided, however, that “Employee” as used herein shall not include an agent, independent contractor or other service provider who is not an employee.

(l) “Employer” shall mean, with respect to any Employee, the Company or Designated Subsidiary by which the employee is employed.

(m) “Exchange Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(n) “Exercise Date” shall mean March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each Plan Year or such other dates determined by the Committee.

(o) “Market Price” shall mean the closing priceconsist of the following classes of stock: (a) One Hundred Thousand (100,000) shares of preferred stock with a par value of one cent ($0.01) per share (“Preferred Stock”); and (b) [[24,000,000] [22,500,000] [21,176,471] [20,000,000] [18,947,368] [18,000,000] [17,142,857] [16,363,636] [15,652,174] [15,000,000] [14,400,000]] shares of common stock with a par value of one cent ($0.01) per share (“Common Stock as reported onStock”). Upon the principal market, trading system or exchange on whichfiling and effectiveness (the “Effective Time”) pursuant to the Company’s Shares are traded asGeneral Corporation Law of the applicable Exercise Date, or, if there was only one sale on such date, then the priceState of such sale, or if there was no sale on such date, then asDelaware (the “DGCL”) of the next preceding date on which there was a sale.

(p) “Offering Date” shall mean January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1this Certificate of each Plan Year or such other dates determined by the Committee.

(q) “Option” shall mean the right or rights granted to Eligible Employees to purchase the Company’s Common Stock under an offering made under the Plan and pursuant to such Eligible Employees’ elections to purchase.

(r) “Parent” shall mean any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations ending with the Company if, at the time of the granting of an Option, each of the corporations other than the employer corporation owns stock possessing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in such chain.

(s) “Participant” shall mean an Eligible Employee who participates in the Plan.

(t) “Plan” shall mean the Ascena Retail Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2018), as amended from time to time.

(u) “Plan Year” shall mean a calendar year beginning January 1 and ending December 31 for which the Plan is in effect. The first Plan Year shall commence on January 1, 2018 and end on December 31, 2018.

(v) “Purchase Period” shall mean the period beginning on an Offering Date and ending on the next succeeding Exercise Date.

(w) “Rule16b-3” shall mean Rule16b-3 promulgated under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act as then in effect or any successor provisions.

(x) “Shares”, “stock” or “Common Stock” shall mean shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $.01 per share.

(y) “Subsidiary” shall mean any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Company if, at the time of the granting of an Option, each of the corporations other than the last corporation in the unbroken chain owns stock possessing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in such chain.

(z) “Subscription Period” shall mean, with respect to each Option, the first day of the preceding Purchase Period through the 20th day of the last month preceding the Purchase Period, or such other period of time designated by the Committee, in its sole discretion, in any offer of Common Stock under the Plan beginning on the first day Eligible Employees may elect to purchase Shares and ending on the last day such elections to purchase are authorized to be received and accepted.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.A-22017 Proxy Statement


3. Shares Reserved for Plan.

(a) The Shares of the Company’s Common Stock to be sold to Eligible Employees under the Plan may, at the election of the Committee, be purchased by the Agent on the open market or may be treasury shares or newly-issued and authorized Shares deliveredAmendment to the Plan, upon such terms as the Committee may approve. The maximum number of Shares which shall be reservedThird Amended and made available for sale under the Plan shall be 4,400,000, including 399,997 shares which have already been issued under the Plan as of and prior to the Effective Date, subject to adjustment as provided in paragraph (b) of this section. The Shares reserved may be issued and sold pursuant to one or more offerings under the Plan. With respect to each offering, the Committee may specify the number of Shares to be made available, the length of the Subscription Period, the length of the Purchase Period, the Offering Dates and such other terms and conditions not inconsistent with the Plan as may be necessary or appropriate. In no event shall the Subscription Period and the Purchase Period together exceed twenty-seven (27) months for any offering.

(b) In the event of any increase, reduction, or change or exchange of Common Stock for a different number or kind of Shares or other securities of the Company by reason of a reclassification, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, reorganization, stock dividend, stock split or reverse stock split, combination or exchange of Shares, repurchase of Shares, change in corporate structure or otherwise, the Committee shall conclusively determine the appropriate equitable adjustments, if any, to be made under the Plan, including without limitation adjustments to the number of Shares which have been authorized for issuance under the Plan but have not yet been placed under Option, as well as the price per Share of Common Stock covered by each Option under the Plan which has not yet been exercised.

(c) Subject to any required action by the stockholders, if the Company is the surviving corporation in any merger or consolidation, any Option granted hereunder shall continue to apply to the Shares. In the event of the complete liquidation of the Company or of a reorganization, consolidation or merger in which the Company is not the surviving corporation, any Option granted under the Plan shall continue solely until immediately prior to the effective date of such liquidation, reorganization, consolidation or merger in which the Company is not surviving corporation.

4. Administration of the Plan.

(a) The Plan shall be administered by the Committee and the Committee may select an administrator or any other person to whom its duties and responsibilities hereunder may be delegated. The Committee shall have full power and authority, subject to the provisions of the Plan, to promulgate such rules and regulations as it deems necessary for the proper administration of the Plan, to interpret the provisions and supervise the administration of the Plan, and to take all actions in connection therewith or in relation thereto as it deems necessary or advisable. The Committee may adopt special guidelines and provisions for persons who are residing in, or subject to the laws of, jurisdictions outside of the United States to comply with applicable laws, including, without limitation, tax and securities laws. All interpretations and determinations of the Committee shall be made in its sole and absolute discretion based on the Plan document and shall be final, conclusive and binding on all parties.

(b) The Committee may employ such legal counsel, consultants, brokers and agents as it may deem desirable for the administration of the Plan and may rely upon any opinion received from any such counsel or consultant and any computation received from any such consultant, broker or agent. The Committee may, in its sole discretion, designate an Agent to administer the Plan, purchase and sell Shares in accordance with the Plan, keep records, send statements of account to employees and to perform other duties relating to the Plan, as the Committee may request from time to time. The Agent shall serve as custodian for purposes of the Plan and, unless otherwise requested by the Participant, Common Stock purchased under the Plan shall be held by and in the name of, or in the name of a nominee of, the custodian for the benefit of each Participant, who shall thereafter be a beneficial stockholder of the Company. The Committee may adopt, amend or repeal any guidelines or requirements necessary for the custody and delivery of the Common Stock, including, without limitation, guidelines regarding the imposition of reasonable fees in certain circumstances.

(c) The Company shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law and the Certificate of Incorporation andBy-laws of the Company and, to the extent not covered by insurance, indemnify each director, officer or employee of the Employer (including the heirs, executors, administrators and other personal representatives of such person) and each member of the Committee against all expenses, costs, liabilities and losses (including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines, excise taxes or penalties, and amounts paid or to be paid in settlement) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with any threatened, pending or actual suit, action or proceeding (whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative in nature or otherwise) in which such person may be involved by reason of the fact that he or she is or was serving this Plan in any capacity at the request of the Company, except in instances where any such person engages in willful misconduct or fraud. Such right of indemnification shall include the right to be paid by the Company for expenses incurred or reasonably anticipated to be incurred in defending any such suit, action or proceeding in advance of its disposition; provided, however, that the payment of expenses in advance of the settlement or final disposition of a suit, action or proceeding, shall be made only upon delivery to the Company of an undertaking by or on behalf of such person to repay all amounts so

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.A-32017 Proxy Statement


advanced if it is ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified hereunder. Such indemnification shall be in addition to any rights of indemnification the person may have as a director, officer or employee or under theRestated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company or theBy-LawsCorporation, each [[fifteen (15)] [sixteen (16)] [seventeen (17)] [eighteen (18)] [nineteen (19) [twenty (20)] [twenty-one (21)] [twenty-two (22)] [twenty-three (23)] [twenty-four (24)] [twenty-five (25)]] shares of the Company. Expenses incurred by the Committee or the Board of Directors in the engagement of any such counsel, consultant or agent shall be paid by the Company.

5. Participation in the Plan.

Options to purchase the Company’sCorporation’s Common Stock under the Plan shall be granted to all Eligible Employees; provided, however, that solelyissued and outstanding or held in treasury immediately prior to the extent allowable under Section 423Effective Time shall, automatically and without any action on the part of the Code, the Committee may determine that an offeringrespective holders thereof, be reclassified combined and converted into one validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable share of Common Stock, under the Plan will not be extended to one or more categories of employees. Any decision relating to the inclusion or exclusion of any executive officer (as defined in Rule3b-7 promulgated under the Exchange Act as then in effect or any successor provisions)par value $0.01 per share, of the Employer pursuant to this section shallCorporation. No fractional shares will be made only by the members of the Committee who are not executive officers of the Employer and who have not participated or been eligible to participateissued in this Plan or any similar employee stock option plan for a period of at least one year prior to such determination. As of the Effective Date until modified by the Committee, no executive officer of the Employer who is a highly compensated employee (within the meaning of Code Section 414(q)) shall be eligible to participate in the Plan.

6. Purchase Price.

The purchase price for Shares purchased pursuant to the Plan shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, and shall remain in effect unless modified at least thirty (30) days prior to the applicable Offering Date, but in no event shall be less than eighty-five percent (85%) of the Market Price of a Share of Common Stock on the Exercise Date. As of the Effective Date until modified by the Committee, the price per Share of the Common Stock subject to an offering shall be eighty-five percent (85%) of the Market Price of a Share of Common Stock on the Exercise Date.

7. Method of Payment.

Payment for Shares purchased pursuant to the Plan shall be made in installments through payroll deductions, with no right of prepayment.

8. Employee’s Election to Purchase; Grants of Options.

(a) In order to enroll and participate in the Plan, an Eligible Employee must make an election on a form provided by the Committee (or its designee) stating the Eligible Employee’s desire to enroll in the Plan to purchase Shares under the Plan during the Purchase Period pursuant to an amount or percentage (on anafter-tax basis) which he or she elects to have withheld each payroll period during the Purchase Period. The Committee (or its designee) may establish minimum or maximum limits to the amounts or percentages that can be elected to be withheld by an Eligible Employee pursuant to the preceding sentence. Such limits may be expressed as either a dollar amount or a percentage of an Eligible Employee’s Annual Pay, provided that any maximum limit established by the Committee (or its designee) shall not exceed 10% of an Eligible Employee’s Annual Pay. In order to be given effect, an Eligible Employee’s election to purchase Shares must be delivered on or before the last day of the Subscription Period to the person or office designated by the Committee to receive and accept such elections. Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, and except as otherwise determined by the Committee (or its designee), once enrolled in the Plan, a Participant’s payroll deduction authorization indicating his or her election to purchase Shares shall remain in effect unless and until modified or canceled by the Participant.

(b) Subject to the provisions of Section 8(c) below, once enrolled in the Plan, a Participant may increase or decrease an existing payroll deduction authorization once during a calendar year. Changes in payroll deduction authorizations shall become effective forty-five (45) days after a notice of change is received by the person or office designated by the Committee to receive and accept such changes but in no case will such change take effect until the Purchase Period following receipt of such notice. A Participant may cancel an existing payroll deduction authorization at any time pursuant to Section 14(a) hereof and thereby terminate participation in the Plan with respect to a Purchase Period.

(c) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, in no event shall a Participant be permitted to increase the rate of his payroll deductions under the Plan to an amount which would result innon-complianceconnection with the limitations stated in Sections 11(a)(ii) or (iii) hereof.

(d) All payroll deductions made by a Participantforegoing. In lieu thereof, the Corporation’s transfer agent shall be credited to such Participant’s account under the Plan. A Participant may not make any additional payments into such account except as otherwise provided herein.

(e) In the event a Participant makes a hardship withdrawal of employee deferral (401(k)) contributions under a 401 (k) profit sharing plan of the Company, a Subsidiary, or a Parent or an affiliate or any other plan qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code that contains a Code

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.A-4��2017 Proxy Statement


Section 401(k) feature, to the extent required by such plan or applicable law, such Participant’s payroll deductionsaggregate all fractional shares and the purchase of Shares under the Plan shall be suspended until the first payroll period following the Offering Date commencing six (6) months after the date the Participant obtained the hardship withdrawal. If a Participant who elects a hardship withdrawal under such a 401(k) profit sharing plan or such other plan has a cash balance accumulated in his or her account at the time of the withdrawal that has not already been applied to purchase Shares, such cash balance shall be returned to the Participant as soon as administratively practicable.

9. Exercise of Option.

(a) A Participant’s election to purchase Shares shall be exercised automatically on each Exercise Date following a Participant’s election, and the maximum number of whole and/or fractional Shares subject to such Option shall be purchased for such Participant at the applicable Option price with the accumulated payroll deductions in such Participant’s account. If all or any portion of the Shares cannot reasonably be purchased on the Exercise Date in the sole discretion of the Committee because of unavailability or any other reason, such purchase shall be made as soon thereafter as feasible. In no event shall certificates for any fractional Shares be issued under the Plan. Shares shall be credited to the Participant’s account as soon as administratively feasible after the Exercise Date.

(b) If all or any portion of the Shares that would otherwise be subject to Options granted on any Offering Date exceeds the number of Shares then available under the Plan (after deduction of all Shares for which Options have been exercised or are then outstanding) or if all or any portion of the Shares cannot reasonably be purchased on the Exercise Date in the sole discretion of the Committee because of any other reason, the Committee shall make a pro rata allocation of the Shares remaining available for Option grant in as uniform a manner as shall be practicable and as it shall determine to be equitable. In such event, (i) all future payroll deductions of the Participants shall cease after such Exercise Date unless and until the Plan is amended in accordance with Section 20 of the Plan to increase the Shares reserved and made available for sale under the Plan, and (ii) the Committee shall give written notice to each Participant of the reduction of Option Shares affected thereby and shall similarly reduce the rate of each Participant’s payroll deductions, if necessary (including to zero), and return any remaining payroll deduction balance credited to each Participant, if necessary.

10. Delivery of Common Stock.

All the Shares purchased by a Participant on an Exercise Date shall, for all purposes, be deemed to have been issued and sold as of the close of business on such Exercise Date. Prior to that time the Participant shall have none of the rights or privileges of a stockholder of the Company with respect to such Shares.

All the Shares purchased pursuant to the Plan shall be delivered by the Company in a manner as determined from time to time, by the Board or its Committee. The Board or its Committee, in its discretion, may determine that the Shares shall be delivered by the Company to the Participant in book-entry form or by issuing and delivering a certificate for the number of Shares purchased by a Participant on an Exercise Date, or that the Shares purchased by a Participant on an Exercise Date, be delivered to a securities brokerage firm, as selected by the Board or its Committee, and such Shares shall be maintained by the securities brokerage firm in separate Plan accounts for Participants. The Company will not issue fractional Shares, but the securities brokerage firm will maintain fractional interest in such Shares.

Each certificate or investment account, as the case may be, may be in the name of the Participant or in such Participant’s name jointly with a member of his or her family (over 21 years of age) with the right of survivorship. A Participant who is a resident of a jurisdiction which does not recognize such joint tenancy may have a certificate or Plan account in his or her name as tenant in common with a member of his or her family (over 21 years of age), without right of survivorship. Such designation may be changed by filing a notice of such change.

11. Limitations of Number of Shares Which May Be Purchased.

(a) Notwithstanding any provisions of the Plan to the contrary, no individual shall be granted an Option under the Plan:

(i) if, immediately after the grant, such individual (or any other person whose stock would be attributed to such individual pursuant to Section 424(d) of the Code) would own stock and/or hold outstanding Options to purchase stock possessing five percent (5%) or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or of any Subsidiary or Parent; or

(ii) which permits such individual’s right to purchase stock under all employee stock purchase plans (as described in Section 423 of the Code) of the Company and any Subsidiary or Parent to accrue at a rate which exceeds twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000) of fair market value of such stock (determined at the time such option is granted) for any calendar year in which such option is outstanding at any time; or

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.A-52017 Proxy Statement


(iii) which permits an Eligible Employee to purchase Shares during any one offering pursuant to the Plan for an aggregate purchase price (which shall be computed on an annual basis in the event the Purchase Period is more or less than twelve (12) months) in excess of ten percent (10%) of his or her Annual Pay.

(b) An Eligible Employee may elect to purchase less than the number of Shares which he or she is entitled to elect to purchase.

12. Stockholder Rights.

The Common Stock purchased upon exercise of an Option hereunder shall be credited to the Participant’s account under the Plan and shall be deemed to be transferred to the Participant on the Exercise Date. Only upon the issuance of Shares to a Participant or his agent (and only in respect to such Shares purchased) shall a Participant obtain the rights of stockholders, including, without limitation, any right to vote the Shares or receive any dividends or any other distributions thereon. The Shares purchased will be issuedsell them as soon as practicable after the Exercise Date.

13. Rights to Purchase Shares Not Transferable.

(a) Neither payroll deductions credited to a Participant’s account nor any rights with regard toEffective Time at the exercisethen-prevailing prices on the open market, on behalf of an Option orthose stockholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive Shares under the Plan may be sold, pledged, assigned or transferred in any manner otherwise than by will or the laws of descenta fractional share, and distribution. Any such attempt at assignment, transfer, pledge or other disposition shall be without effect, except that the Company may treat such act as a cancellation of a Participant’s election to purchase shares in accordance with Section 14 hereof.

(b) All rights of a Participant granted under this Plan, including but not limited to, the grant of an Option, the right to exercise an Option and the ability to authorize payroll deductions shall relate solely to a Participant, except as otherwise provided in Section  17 hereof.

14. Cancellation of Election to Purchase.

(a) A Participant who has elected to purchase Shares during a Purchase Period may cancel his or her election to purchase Shares with respect to such Purchase Period. Any such cancellation shall apply to all payroll deductions withheld (and any other amounts credited to his or her account) during the Purchase Period. A cancellation shall be effective as soon as administratively feasible after the delivery bytransfer agent’s completion of such sale, stockholders shall receive a cash payment from the Participant of sufficient prior written notice of cancellation on a form provided by, or acceptabletransfer agent in an amount equal to the Committee for such purpose to the office or person designated by the Committee to receive such elections. In order to be given effect with respect to a Purchase Period, a notice of cancellation must be so delivered no later than the date set by the Committee.

(b) A Participant’s rights, upon the cancellation of his or her election to purchase Shares, shall be limited to receiving in cash, as soon as practicable after deliverytheir respective pro rata shares of the noticetotal net proceeds of cancellation, the cash balance (without interest) then credited to his or her account.

(c) A Participant’s cancellation of his or her election to purchase Shares in an offering shall not have any effect upon such Participant’s eligibility to participate in a subsequent offering or in any similar plan which may hereafter be adopted by the Company; provided, however, that in the event a Participant cancels his or her election to purchase Shares in an offering such Participant may not reenter the Plan until twelve (12) months from the date the Participant canceled his or her election.

15. Leave of Absence or Layoff.

sale.

Subject to the second sentencerights of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock as provided for or fixed pursuant to the provisions of subsection (a) of this Section 15, in the event that, during a Purchase Period, a Participant is granted a leave of absence (including a military leave) or is laid off, the Participant’s election to purchase Shares shall be deemed to have been canceled at the time of the leave of absence or layoff. A Participant’s rights upon a leave of absence (including a military leave) or layoff shall, subject to any rights under law, be limited to having the cash balance credited to his or her account at the time such leave of absence or layoff becomes effective applied to the purchase of4, the number of Shares such amount will then purchase at the endauthorized shares of the Purchase Period.

16. Effect of Failure to Make Payments When Due.

(a) If, in any payroll period, for any reason not set forth in Section 14, a Participant who has filed an election to purchase Shares under the Plan has no pay or his or her pay is insufficient (after other authorized deductions) to permit payroll deductions to be withheld and credited to his account in the Plan, the Participant may make an installment payment (or payments) to the Plan in cash at such time equal to the amount (or amounts) that would have been withheld from his pay. If the Participant fails to make such cash payment (or payments), when the Participant’s pay is again sufficient to permit the resumption of payroll deductions, the Participant will be required to pay in cash the amount of the deficiency in his or her account or arrange for uniformly increased payroll deductions such that, assuming the maximum purchase price per Share, payment

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.A-62017 Proxy Statement


for the maximum number of Shares covered by his or her Option will be completed in the last month of the Purchase Period. If the Participant elects to make increased installment payments, he or she may, nevertheless, at any time make up the remaining deficiency by making a lump sum payment.

(b) Subject to paragraph (a) above and other provisions of the Plan permitting postponement, the Company may treat the failure by a Participant to make any payment as a cancellation of his or her election to purchase Shares. Such cancellation will be affected by mailing notice to him or her at his or her last known business or home address. Upon such mailing, his or her only right will be to receive in cash the amount credited to his or her account.

17. Termination of Continuous Service; Other Involuntary Withdrawal.

If a Participant’s Continuous Service terminates for any reason, or if a Participant ceases to be an Eligible Employee, the entire payroll deduction amount of such Employee on the effective date of any such occurrence shall be used to purchase Shares hereunder as of the next succeeding Exercise Date; provided, however, that if a Designated Subsidiary is no longer part of the Plan, the entire payroll deduction amount to the credit of a Participant who is employed by such Subsidiary shall be refunded to such Employee.

18. Dividends and Interest.

(a) Cash dividends, if any, on Shares acquired through the Plan will be automatically paid by check directly to the Participant by the Company, or if applicable, the transfer agent. Dividends paid in property other than cashPreferred Stock or Common Stock shallmay be distributed to Participants as soon as practicable.

(b) Except as requiredincreased or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) by law, no interest shall accrue on or be payable with respect to the payroll deductionsaffirmative vote of the holders of a Participantmajority in voting power of the stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the Plan.

19. Applicationelection of Funds.

All funds received by the Company in payment for Shares purchased under the Plan and held by the Company at any time may be used for any valid corporate purpose.

20. Amendment and Termination.

The Company, by actiondirectors, irrespective of the Boardprovisions of DirectorsSection 242(b)(2) of the DGCL (or any successor provision thereto), voting together as a single class, without a separate vote of the holders of the class or classes the number of authorized shares of which are being increased or decreased.”

SECOND: The foregoing amendment was duly authorized committee) or the Committee may at any time terminate, amend or freeze the Plan. No such termination shall adversely affect Options previously granted and no amendment may make any change in any Option theretofore granted which adversely affects the rights of any Participant. No amendment shall be effective unless approvedadopted by the stockholders of the Company if stockholder approval of such amendment is required to comply with Section 423 of the Code or to comply with any other applicable law, regulation or stock exchange rule. Upon termination of the Plan, the Company shall return or distribute the payroll deductions credited to a Participant’s account (that have not been used to purchase Shares) and shall distribute or credit Shares credited to a Participant’s account. Upon the freezing of the Plan, any payroll deductions credited to a Participant’s account (that have not been used to purchase Shares) shall be used to purchase SharesCorporation in accordance with Section 9 hereof, substituting the term Exercise Date with the effective date242 of the freezing of the Plan.

21. Reports.

Individual accounts shall be maintained for each Participant in the Plan. Statements of account shall be given to Participants at such times prescribed by the Committee; such statements shall set forth the amounts of payroll deductions, the purchase price per Share, the number of Shares purchased, the aggregate Shares in the Participant’s account and the remaining cash balance, if any.

22. Effective Date; Governmental Approvals or Consents.

The Plan was originally adopted by the board of directors of The Dress Barn, Inc., the Company’s predecessor, on September 29, 2005, and approved by the shareholders of The Dress Barn, Inc. on November 30, 2005. Subsequently, in December 2010, June 2016 and August 2017, the Plan was amended by the Board of Directors in a manner not requiring the approval by the stockholders of the Company. An amendment and restatement of the Plan was adopted by the Board and Committee in October 2017, subject to stockholder approval at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders on December 7, 2017. The Plan and any offerings and sales to Eligible Employees under it are subject to any governmental approvals or consents that may be or become applicable in connection therewith. The Board of Directors or the Committee may make such changes in the Plan and include such terms in any offering under the Plan as may be necessary or desirable, in the opinion of counsel, so that the Plan will comply with the rules and regulations of any governmental authority and so that Eligible Employees participating in the Plan will be eligible for tax benefits under the Code or the laws of any state.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.A-72017 Proxy Statement


23. Notices.

All notices or other communications by a Participant to the Company or the Committee under or in connection with the Plan shall be deemed to have been duly given when received in the form specified by the Company or Committee at the location, or by the person, designated for the receipt thereof and within the time period prescribed by the Company or Committee. Each Participant shall be responsible for furnishing the Committee with the current and proper address for the mailing of notices and the delivery of other information. Any notices or communications by the Company to a Participant shall be deemed given if directed to such address and mailed by regular United States mail, first-class and prepaid. If any item mailed to such address is returned as undeliverable to the addressee, mailing shall be suspended until the Participant furnishes the proper address.

24. Regulations and Other Approvals; Governing Law.

(a) This Plan and the rights of all persons claiming hereunder shall be construed and determined in accordance with the lawsGeneral Corporation Law of the State of Delaware without giving effect to the choice of law principles thereof, except to the extent that such law is preempted by federal law.

(b) The obligationon ________________, at an Annual Meeting of the Company to sell or deliver Shares with respect to Options granted under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations, including all applicable federal and state securities laws, and the obtaining of all such approvals by governmental agencies as may be deemed necessary or appropriate by the Committee. The Company shall not be obligated to issue any Shares to a Participant if, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, the issuance of such Shares will constitute a violation by the Participant or the Company of any provisions of any rule or regulation of any governmental authority or any national securities exchange.

(c) To the extent required, the Plan is intended to comply with exemptive conditions under Rule16b-3 and the Committee shall interpret and administer the provisionsStockholders of the Plan in a manner consistent therewith. Any provisions inconsistent with Rule16b-3Corporation, and such amendment has not been subsequently modified or rescinded.


THIRD: This Certificate of Amendment shall be inoperative and shall not affect the validitybecome effective as of the Plan.

(d) The Plan is not subject to any of the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, nor is it intended[______________], 20__ at [____] [a.m./p.m.]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this certificate to be qualified under Section 401(a)signed this ________________ day of the Code.

________________, 20__.

By:_______________________________________
Name: ____________________________________
Title:______________________________________
* * * * * * *
25. Withholding of Taxes.

(a) If the Participant makes a disposition, within the meaning of Section 424(c) of the Code and regulations promulgated thereunder, of any Share or Shares issued to such Participant pursuant to such Participant’s exercise of an Option, and such disposition occurs within thetwo-year period commencing on the day after the Offering Date or within theone-year period commencing on the day after the Exercise Date, such Participant shall immediately, or as soon as practicable thereafter, notify the Company thereof and, if applicable, thereafter immediately deliver to the Company any amount of federal, state or local income taxes and other amounts which the Company informs the Participant the Company is required to withhold.

(b) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Employer shall have the right to make such provisions as it deems necessary to satisfy any obligations to withhold federal, state, or local income taxes or other taxes incurred by reason of the issuance of Common Stock pursuant to the Plan. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if applicable, the Employer may require a Participant to remit an amount equal to the required withholding amount and may invalidate any election if the Participant does not remit applicable withholding taxes. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, solely to the extent permitted by law, any withholding obligation with regard to any Participant may be satisfied by: (i) reducing the number of shares of Common Stock otherwise deliverable to the Participant; (ii) subject to the Committee’s prior consent, any method approved by the Committee; or (iii) by the Participant paying cash directly to the Company.

26. Restrictions.

All certificates for Shares delivered under the Plan shall be subject to such stock transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable to assist in the compliance with any applicable tax withholding laws or under the rules, regulations and other requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any stock exchange upon which the Common Stock is then listed or any national securities association system upon whose system the Common Stock is then quoted, any applicable Federal or state securities law, and any applicable corporate law and the Committee may cause a legend or legends to be put on any such certificates to make appropriate reference to such restrictions.

27. No Employment Rights.

The establishment and operation of this Plan shall not confer any legal rights upon any Participant or other person for a continuation of employment, nor shall it interfere with the rights of an Employer to discharge any employee and to treat him or her without regard to the effect which that treatment might have upon him or her as a Participant or potential Participant under the Plan.



LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.A-82017 Proxy Statement


28. Severability of Provisions.

If any provision of the Plan shall be held invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions hereof, and the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if such provisions had not been included.

29. Construction.

The use of a masculine pronoun shall include the feminine, and the singular form shall include the plural form, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The headings and captions herein are provided for reference and convenience only, shall not be considered part of the Plan, and shall not be employed in the construction of the Plan.

30. Electronic Elections, Purchases, and Transactions.

Any election, purchase or other transaction hereunder that is required to be made in writing may, to the extent determined by the Committee, be made, delivered and accepted electronically.

LOGO
Ascena Retail Group, Inc.A-92017 Proxy Statement


ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.

933 MacArthur Boulevard

Mahwah, New Jersey 07430

VOTE BY INTERNET – www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 PM Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the cost incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE – 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions until 11:59 PM Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:   KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS    
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —— — — —  — — —
   DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION  ONLY




THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED

  ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.          
 ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC. 
  
The Board of Directors recommends you Vote “FOR” the election of the threefour nominees for Director, and “FOR” Proposals 2, 3 and 5 and for every “1 Year” with regards to Proposal 4.       
    
  1.  Election of Directors   
   Nominees:   
1.Election of Directors      
  Nominees: Terms expiring at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:  For Against Abstain  
  Terms of office expiring at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:ForAgainstAbstain  01)      David Jaffe   
      01)      Katie J. Bayne    02)      Kate Buggeln    
      02)      Paul Keglevic    03)      Carl Rubin   
  
  2.      03)      Kay Krill Proposal to approve the Ascena Retail Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2018). 

For

Against

Abstain

  
     
04)      Stacey Rauch3.Proposal to approve, by non-binding vote, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers during fiscal 2017.   
  

4.

Proposal to recommend, by non-binding vote, the frequency of future advisory votes on compensation paid to our named executive officers.

1 Year

2 Years

3 Years

Abstain

5.

Proposal to ratify Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for fiscal year ending August 4, 2018.

For

Against

Abstain

For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.  ☐
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.Yes  ☐No  ☐  
              
       
2.
Proposal to approve, by non-binding vote, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers during fiscal 2019.

 
For
Against
Abstain
 

3.Proposal to approve an amendment to the Company’s Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock, at a ratio to be determined by the Board, and a corresponding reduction in the Company’s authorized shares of common stock.
4.Proposal to ratify Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for fiscal year ending August 1, 2020.
For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.  ☐
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.Yes ☐No  ☐
Note: Proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion with respect to other matters which may come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.

     
      
 Signature (PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX)Date 

Signature (Joint Owners)

(SIGN WITHIN BOX)

Date
       


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting

The Notice and Proxy Statement Annual Report and Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.

— — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —— — — — — — —

ASCENA RETAIL GROUP, INC.

933 MacArthur Boulevard

Mahwah, New Jersey 07430

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned revokes all previous proxies, acknowledges receipt of the notice of the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Ascena Retail Group, Inc. (the “Company”), to be held on December 7, 201710, 2019 and the proxy statement, and hereby appoints Randy L. PearceLinda Yaccarino and Katie J. Bayne,John Welborn, Jr., and each of them, as attorney-in-fact, proxies with power of substitution to vote on behalf of the undersigned all shares of the Company that the undersigned may be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at 3:00 p.m. local time at dressbarn’sits Corporate Headquarters, Stage Street Café, 933 MacArthur Boulevard, Mahwah,



New Jersey 07430 on December 7, 2017,10, 2019, and any adjournments or postponements thereof, with all powers the undersigned would possess if personally present, with respect to the following:

This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR the nominees listed in proposal No. 1, FOR the approval of proposal No. 2, FOR the approval of proposal No. 3 for “1-Year” with respect to proposal No. 4 and FOR the approval of proposal No. 5.4. The proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion with respect to other matters which may come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. A majority of the proxies or substitutes present at the meeting may exercise all powers granted hereby.

 Address Changes/Comments:

   

(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side)

Continued and to be signed on reverse side